本文選題：流動(dòng)攤販　切入點(diǎn)：疏導(dǎo)　出處：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)下行壓力加大和城市化深入,大量的農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力和城市失業(yè)人口涌入到流動(dòng)攤販的隊(duì)列中。流動(dòng)攤販規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大,一方面增加了城市的就業(yè),便利了居民的生活,另一方面也不可避免的給城市帶來(lái)環(huán)境、交通、食品安全等問(wèn)題,阻礙了城市功能的發(fā)揮。因此,各地政府紛紛從放任的管理轉(zhuǎn)向嚴(yán)厲的管制,對(duì)流動(dòng)攤販采取取締的措施,以期讓流動(dòng)攤販徹底消失,然而政府的嚴(yán)厲措施并沒(méi)有取得預(yù)期的治理效果,反而激化了流動(dòng)攤販與城市管理部門(mén)的矛盾,沖突事件頻頻發(fā)生。政府部門(mén)意識(shí)到流動(dòng)攤販的存在有其一定的合理性,完全的禁止是不可能的,只有疏堵結(jié)合才是治理流動(dòng)攤販的唯一途徑。流動(dòng)攤販的疏導(dǎo)雖然在一定程度上減少了流動(dòng)攤販給城市帶來(lái)的負(fù)面影響,有效的緩解了城市管理部門(mén)與流動(dòng)攤販之間的沖突,但是自流動(dòng)攤販的疏導(dǎo)政策實(shí)施以來(lái),并不是每一次疏導(dǎo)都能取得良好的成效。如何提升疏導(dǎo)效果,成為了當(dāng)今城市管理工作的首要問(wèn)題。本文以無(wú)錫市新吳區(qū)流動(dòng)攤販為例,對(duì)流動(dòng)攤販的個(gè)人特征、家庭特征以及經(jīng)營(yíng)特征共計(jì)10個(gè)因素展開(kāi)實(shí)證研究,研究結(jié)果顯示:攤販的性別、受教育程度、流動(dòng)經(jīng)營(yíng)年限對(duì)其接受疏導(dǎo)意愿的影響在1%統(tǒng)計(jì)水平上顯著;攤販的年齡、是否辦理居住證對(duì)其接受疏導(dǎo)意愿的影響在5%統(tǒng)計(jì)水平上顯著;攤販的家庭勞動(dòng)力比重、經(jīng)營(yíng)收入比重對(duì)其接受疏導(dǎo)意愿的影響在10%統(tǒng)計(jì)水平上顯著。其中性別為女性、年齡越大,受教育程度越高、擁有居住證、家庭勞動(dòng)力比重越低、流動(dòng)經(jīng)營(yíng)收入占家庭總收入比重越低、流動(dòng)經(jīng)營(yíng)年限越長(zhǎng)的攤販更傾向于接受政府部門(mén)的疏導(dǎo)。根據(jù)實(shí)證結(jié)果的分析,提出以下建議:優(yōu)先針對(duì)女性攤販和年齡較大的攤販進(jìn)行疏導(dǎo);加大疏導(dǎo)宣傳力度,引導(dǎo)受教育程度較低的攤販接受疏導(dǎo);做好流動(dòng)人口服務(wù)管理,加大推行居住證制度;科學(xué)合理選址,維護(hù)攤販經(jīng)營(yíng)收入;轉(zhuǎn)變傳統(tǒng)治理模式,鼓勵(lì)有能力、有威望的攤販加入疏導(dǎo)管理;對(duì)攤販中低收入家庭加大政策性扶持;擴(kuò)寬低學(xué)歷就業(yè)渠道。
[Abstract]:With the increasing downward pressure on our economy and the deepening of urbanization, a large number of rural surplus labor and urban unemployed people have poured into the queue of mobile vendors. The scale of mobile vendors has been expanding, on the one hand, it has increased urban employment. On the other hand, it inevitably brings environmental, transportation, food safety and other problems to the city, which hinders the development of urban functions. Therefore, local governments have shifted from laissez-faire management to strict control. Measures to ban mobile vendors were taken in order to make them disappear completely. However, the severe measures taken by the government did not achieve the expected effect of governance, on the contrary, they intensified the contradiction between mobile vendors and urban management departments. Conflicts occur frequently. Government departments realize that the existence of mobile vendors is reasonable, and a complete ban is impossible. The only way to deal with mobile vendors is through the combination of shuffling and blocking. Although the diversion of mobile vendors to some extent reduces the negative impact of mobile vendors on the city, it effectively alleviates the conflict between urban management departments and mobile vendors. However, since the implementation of the mobile vendors' grooming policy, not every time has been able to achieve good results. How to improve the effect of dredging has become the most important issue in urban management. This paper takes the mobile vendors in Wuxi Xinwu District as an example. An empirical study was carried out on 10 factors including personal characteristics, family characteristics and business characteristics of mobile vendors. The results showed that the vendors' gender, education level, The influence of floating operating years on their willingness to accept persuasion is significant in 1% statistical level; the age of vendors and whether they apply for residence permits have a significant effect on their willingness to accept persuasion; the proportion of family labor force of vendors is significant at 5% level. The effect of the proportion of operating income on their willingness to receive guidance is significant at the 10% statistical level. The gender is female, the older the age, the higher the education level, the higher the residence permit, the lower the proportion of the family labor force. The lower the proportion of mobile operating income to total household income, the longer the current operating years, vendors are more likely to accept the guidance of government departments. The following suggestions are put forward as follows: giving priority to women vendors and older vendors; increasing the propaganda efforts to guide the less educated vendors to accept the guidance; do a good job in the management of floating population services and increase the implementation of the residence permit system; Scientific and reasonable siting, maintenance of vendors operating income; transformation of the traditional governance model, encourage the competent and prestigious vendors to join the grooming management; increase the policy support for the vendors of low and middle income families; widen the employment channels with low academic qualifications.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;城市流動(dòng)攤販管理:治理模式的轉(zhuǎn)型與實(shí)現(xiàn)條件[J];公安研究;2009年05期

2 張英魁;劉興鵬;;城鄉(xiāng)二元結(jié)構(gòu)視閾中城市流動(dòng)攤販的治理[J];行政論壇;2009年04期

3 申金明;;如何實(shí)施對(duì)流動(dòng)攤販的“疏”與“堵”[J];中共桂林市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

4 呂燕;;權(quán)利均衡、流動(dòng)的風(fēng)景與走出城管困境——關(guān)于揚(yáng)州市流動(dòng)攤販城管狀況的調(diào)查與啟示[J];理論與改革;2010年02期

5 陳星宇;范兆飛;李波;;南寧市流動(dòng)攤販的社會(huì)控制研究[J];學(xué)理論;2013年12期

6 田必耀;;“整編”流動(dòng)攤販?zhǔn)敲裆}[J];中國(guó)人大;2009年15期

7 翟代偉;;大學(xué)城流動(dòng)攤販的治理研究——以福州大學(xué)城為例[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年35期

8 王亞利;;沖突與平衡:攤販生存與城管執(zhí)法[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年12期

9 陳尉;;淺析城市流動(dòng)攤販治理中的城管執(zhí)法困境[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年07期

10 邢妍妮;;我國(guó)流動(dòng)攤販制度化規(guī)范方式研究[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 孫璐;;城市攤販的空間抗?fàn)帯值乐械姆钦娇臻g思考[A];多元與包容——2012中國(guó)城市規(guī)劃年會(huì)論文集(13.城市規(guī)劃管理)[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 王繼輝;流動(dòng)攤販仍是農(nóng)村一道風(fēng)景[N];洛陽(yáng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 陳進(jìn);社會(huì)需求,是流動(dòng)攤販難禁的根源[N];新華每日電訊;2006年

3 見(jiàn)習(xí)記者 陳健兒 通訊員 李現(xiàn);我市首次對(duì)流動(dòng)攤販開(kāi)禁[N];中山日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

4 庾向榮;對(duì)流動(dòng)攤販既要給名分更要給實(shí)惠[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

5 何蘭生;流動(dòng)攤販合法化值得期待[N];農(nóng)民日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

6 陳英鳳;流動(dòng)攤販變個(gè)體需配套政策跟進(jìn)[N];中國(guó)信息報(bào);2009年

7 本報(bào)記者 童岱　李琢;流動(dòng)攤販的合法之路[N];北京科技報(bào);2009年

8 胡俊修 三峽大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;流動(dòng)攤販:近代中國(guó)的“城市之聲”[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2012年

9 王早霞;引攤?cè)胧袨榱鲃?dòng)攤販“筑巢安家”[N];山西日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

10 本報(bào)實(shí)習(xí)生 王麗 徐艷梅;疏導(dǎo)流動(dòng)攤販 合法規(guī)范經(jīng)營(yíng)[N];內(nèi)江日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 林榮燕;我國(guó)城市流動(dòng)攤販管理現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2008年

2 李嘉毅;上海流動(dòng)攤販問(wèn)題研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2009年

3 郭寧;我國(guó)城市流動(dòng)攤販治理模式研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

4 嚴(yán)蘇桐;中小城市流動(dòng)攤販的治理：?jiǎn)栴}與對(duì)策[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

5 王東莉;流動(dòng)攤販經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)規(guī)制研究[D];南京大學(xué);2011年

6 徐東;沈陽(yáng)市流動(dòng)攤販管理問(wèn)題研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2011年

7 何強(qiáng);長(zhǎng)沙市區(qū)流動(dòng)攤販聚集場(chǎng)地景觀整治研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2009年

8 吳名揚(yáng);南寧市高校周邊流動(dòng)攤販治理主體多元化研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2012年

9 李躍歌;民生視角下我國(guó)城市流動(dòng)攤販治理研究[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

10 陳國(guó)強(qiáng);城市流動(dòng)攤販管理的困境及其突破[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1637227