【摘要】：規(guī)劃編制和實(shí)施監(jiān)督是充分發(fā)揮城市規(guī)劃調(diào)控作用的兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié),規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估是對(duì)城市規(guī)劃實(shí)效性的核心衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。然而,由于我國城市所處的客觀發(fā)展階段,城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估研究起步晚,相關(guān)實(shí)踐工作的開展嚴(yán)重滯后于實(shí)施評(píng)估理論研究。目前,城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估做為一種目的性工作,被廣泛運(yùn)用于修編下一輪規(guī)劃前的法定程序現(xiàn)象較為普遍,無法發(fā)揮實(shí)施評(píng)估有效作用。論文以動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)為切入點(diǎn),運(yùn)用多種研究方法,深入探討城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施的影響因素,以城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施結(jié)果作為評(píng)估對(duì)象,圍繞實(shí)施成效和實(shí)施管理兩個(gè)方面建構(gòu)城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估體系,研究動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)機(jī)制對(duì)規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估結(jié)果及時(shí)反饋至規(guī)劃編制的促進(jìn)作用。論文結(jié)合實(shí)證研究,對(duì)淮南市城市總體規(guī)劃進(jìn)行實(shí)施評(píng)估,提出面向動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)的城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估方法,加強(qiáng)對(duì)規(guī)劃實(shí)施的動(dòng)態(tài)監(jiān)控,建立城市總體規(guī)劃動(dòng)態(tài)監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)、信息反饋系統(tǒng),確保城市總體規(guī)劃的動(dòng)態(tài)實(shí)施過程和結(jié)果具有合理性、科學(xué)性。首先,本文對(duì)國內(nèi)外動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)和城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估理論研究成果進(jìn)行了綜述,在對(duì)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行深入研讀和思考后,分析我國規(guī)劃編制和實(shí)施成效產(chǎn)生差異原因,提出動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)機(jī)制對(duì)縮小差異的積極作用。其次,鑒于對(duì)城市總體規(guī)劃進(jìn)行實(shí)施評(píng)估更具有指導(dǎo)意義,本文以城市總體規(guī)劃為研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用層次分析法和專家咨詢法等,從城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施成效和城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施管理兩個(gè)方面入手,構(gòu)建城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估模型。評(píng)估模型包括2大評(píng)估層次,8個(gè)評(píng)估要素和24個(gè)評(píng)估因子,以層次分析法和專家咨詢法對(duì)每項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重進(jìn)行分配,并確定實(shí)施評(píng)估計(jì)算模型;最后,選擇《淮南市城市總體規(guī)劃(2010—2020)》實(shí)施評(píng)估為案例,對(duì)其進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)和總結(jié)規(guī)劃實(shí)施與規(guī)劃目標(biāo)之間的偏差,探索偏差形成原因,尋找影響城市規(guī)劃有效實(shí)施的因素,提出完善動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)機(jī)制促進(jìn)規(guī)劃有效實(shí)施的措施,為城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估研究提供參考與借鑒。另對(duì)此次研究的創(chuàng)新之處予以說明,指出評(píng)估過程中存在的問題及不足,并且為進(jìn)一步的研究指明方向,提出改進(jìn)措施。
[Abstract]:Planning preparation and implementation supervision are two key links to give full play to the role of urban planning regulation and control. Planning implementation evaluation is the core measure of the effectiveness of urban planning. However, due to the objective development stage of Chinese cities, the study of urban planning implementation evaluation started late, and the related practical work lagged behind the implementation evaluation theory research seriously. At present, as a purposeful work, urban planning implementation evaluation is widely used in the revision of the next round of planning before the legal process phenomenon is relatively common, can not play an effective role in the implementation of evaluation. This paper takes dynamic maintenance as the breakthrough point, uses various research methods, deeply discusses the influencing factors of the implementation of urban planning, and takes the implementation results of urban master planning as the evaluation object. Based on the implementation effect and implementation management, the evaluation system of urban master planning implementation is constructed, and the dynamic maintenance mechanism is studied to facilitate the planning implementation evaluation results feedback to the planning compilation in time. Based on the empirical research, this paper evaluates the implementation of urban master plan in Huainan city, puts forward a dynamic maintenance oriented evaluation method of urban master planning implementation, strengthens the dynamic monitoring and control of planning implementation, and establishes a dynamic monitoring system for urban master planning. The information feedback system ensures that the dynamic implementation process and results of the urban master plan are reasonable and scientific. Firstly, this paper summarizes the theoretical research results of dynamic maintenance and urban planning implementation evaluation at home and abroad. After deeply studying and pondering over the literature, this paper analyzes the reasons for the differences in planning formulation and implementation results in China. The active effect of dynamic maintenance mechanism on narrowing the difference is put forward. Secondly, in view of the more guiding significance of the implementation evaluation of urban master planning, this paper takes urban master planning as the research object, using AHP and expert consultation, etc. The evaluation model of urban master planning implementation is constructed from two aspects: the effect of urban master plan implementation and the urban planning implementation management. The evaluation model consists of 2 assessment levels, 8 evaluation elements and 24 evaluation factors. The weight of each index is allocated by AHP and expert consultation, and the evaluation calculation model is determined. This paper selects "Huainan City Master Plan (2010-2020)" as a case study, analyzes it empirically, finds out and summarizes the deviation between planning implementation and planning goal, and explores the reasons for the deviation. This paper looks for the factors that affect the effective implementation of urban planning, puts forward the measures to improve the dynamic maintenance mechanism to promote the effective implementation of urban planning, and provides a reference for the study of urban planning implementation evaluation. In addition, the paper explains the innovation of this research, points out the problems and shortcomings in the process of evaluation, and points out the direction for further research and puts forward some improvement measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽建筑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TU984

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 孫施文;城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施的政府機(jī)構(gòu)協(xié)同機(jī)制——以上海為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2002年01期

2 段進(jìn);中國城市規(guī)劃的理論與實(shí)踐問題思考[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2005年01期

3 田莉;呂傳廷;沈體雁;;城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)價(jià)的理論與實(shí)證研究——以廣州市總體規(guī)劃(2001-2010年)為例[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2008年05期

4 呂萌麗;吳志勇;;城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施年度評(píng)價(jià)探析——以廣州市為例[J];規(guī)劃師;2010年11期

5 何靈聰;;基于動(dòng)態(tài)維護(hù)的城市總體規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估方法和機(jī)制研究[J];規(guī)劃師;2013年06期

6 周國艷;;城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施有效性評(píng)價(jià):從關(guān)注結(jié)果轉(zhuǎn)向關(guān)注過程的動(dòng)態(tài)監(jiān)控[J];規(guī)劃師;2013年06期

7 徐瑋;;理性評(píng)估、科學(xué)編制,提高規(guī)劃的針對(duì)性和前瞻性——上�？刂菩栽敿�(xì)規(guī)劃實(shí)施評(píng)估方法研究[J];上海城市規(guī)劃;2011年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 陳燁;;動(dòng)態(tài)漸進(jìn)規(guī)劃體系中的總體規(guī)劃評(píng)估機(jī)制解析[A];轉(zhuǎn)型與重構(gòu)——2011中國城市規(guī)劃年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡燕君;基于多目標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)方法的城市規(guī)劃實(shí)施結(jié)果評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2195343