發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-06 23:00

  本文選題：名山風(fēng)景區(qū)　切入點(diǎn)：審美價(jià)值　出處：《清華大學(xué)》2015年博士論文

【摘要】：基于傳統(tǒng)山水審美的名山風(fēng)景區(qū)審美價(jià)值識(shí)別與保護(hù)研究既是解決我國(guó)名山風(fēng)景區(qū)審美價(jià)值保護(hù)管理問(wèn)題的內(nèi)在需求,也是彌補(bǔ)國(guó)際組織在遺產(chǎn)地審美評(píng)價(jià)中長(zhǎng)期缺乏中國(guó)視角的外在需求。論文總結(jié)并比較了國(guó)內(nèi)外風(fēng)景評(píng)估及保護(hù)的理論研究與實(shí)踐案例,提出了目前我國(guó)在名山風(fēng)景區(qū)審美價(jià)值識(shí)別與保護(hù)方面的4點(diǎn)不足。并歸納總結(jié)了世界各國(guó)的6大審美體系,提出了對(duì)我國(guó)審美價(jià)值識(shí)別與保護(hù)框架建構(gòu)的借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn)。論文立足于傳統(tǒng),總結(jié)出我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)山水審美4個(gè)特點(diǎn)為:審美過(guò)程中主體性顯著;“融情于景”的審美主客體關(guān)系;“以大觀小”的審美方式;“虛實(shí)相生”的審美結(jié)果。闡釋了傳統(tǒng)審美作用中的各要素及相互作用,依據(jù)價(jià)值論中的主體、客體、主客體作用關(guān)系來(lái)闡釋審美價(jià)值�；谏鲜龌A(chǔ),論文構(gòu)建了中國(guó)名山風(fēng)景區(qū)審美價(jià)值識(shí)別框架,并闡釋了該框架的主體差異性和歷時(shí)性兩個(gè)特點(diǎn),以及它們分別的識(shí)別結(jié)果。主體差異性審美價(jià)值是考察不同主體在同一時(shí)間對(duì)同一客體的審美價(jià)值。主體差異性審美識(shí)別得出不同主體的審美價(jià)值。歷時(shí)性審美識(shí)別是考察不同主體作為整體在不同時(shí)間對(duì)同一客體的審美價(jià)值。歷時(shí)性審美識(shí)別得出審美在歷史上的變化與傳承。而審美價(jià)值識(shí)別框架本身具有層次性,因而審美價(jià)值識(shí)別也具有層次性。論文繼而通過(guò)歸納演繹、比較研究、內(nèi)容分析等方法,進(jìn)一步構(gòu)建了審美價(jià)值識(shí)別框架中的關(guān)鍵步驟、方法及指標(biāo)。審美價(jià)值識(shí)別依然從主體差異性和歷時(shí)性兩個(gè)維度展開(kāi)。在主體差異性審美價(jià)值識(shí)別中,通過(guò)權(quán)重分配識(shí)別出主要主體的審美價(jià)值,通過(guò)分層建立識(shí)別方法與指標(biāo),識(shí)別出不同層次的審美價(jià)值及對(duì)應(yīng)的載體。在歷時(shí)性審美價(jià)值識(shí)別中,構(gòu)建詩(shī)文分析理法和圖像分析法來(lái)識(shí)別歷時(shí)性審美價(jià)值,并通過(guò)古今比較研究確定值得傳承的審美價(jià)值。在價(jià)值識(shí)別的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了基于價(jià)值識(shí)別的審美價(jià)值保護(hù)框架。從宏觀國(guó)土和單個(gè)風(fēng)景區(qū)層面為我國(guó)名山風(fēng)景區(qū)審美價(jià)值保護(hù)管理及規(guī)劃提出了建議。提出了確立保護(hù)對(duì)象,識(shí)別影響因素和敏感度,制定保護(hù)措施與展示措施3個(gè)關(guān)鍵步驟及相關(guān)方法�；趯徝纼r(jià)值識(shí)別的保護(hù)框架回應(yīng)了現(xiàn)有審美保護(hù)中的保護(hù)對(duì)象過(guò)于寬泛、保護(hù)沒(méi)有針對(duì)性的問(wèn)題。最后,論文以黃山風(fēng)景名勝為例,驗(yàn)證了依據(jù)新構(gòu)建的審美價(jià)值識(shí)別和保護(hù)框架所識(shí)別的黃山審美價(jià)值與世界遺產(chǎn)OUV評(píng)價(jià)的根本差別,以及保護(hù)對(duì)象及保護(hù)措施的差異,繼而證實(shí)了該審美價(jià)值識(shí)別與保護(hù)框架可行性,也進(jìn)一步提出了局限與不足。
[Abstract]:The identification and protection of the aesthetic value of famous mountains and scenic spots based on traditional landscape aesthetics is the internal demand to solve the problem of protecting and managing the aesthetic value of famous mountains and scenic spots in China.It is also a remedy for the lack of Chinese perspective in the long-term aesthetic evaluation of heritage sites by international organizations.This paper summarizes and compares the theoretical research and practical cases of landscape evaluation and protection at home and abroad, and points out four deficiencies in the recognition and protection of the aesthetic value of famous scenic spots in China.It also summarizes the six major aesthetic systems in the world, and puts forward the reference experience for the construction of the aesthetic value recognition and protection framework of our country.Based on tradition, this paper summarizes the four characteristics of traditional landscape aesthetics in China: subjectivity in aesthetic process, relationship between subject and object of aesthetic subject and object of "fusion of emotion and scenery", aesthetic mode of "seeing small with great views" and aesthetic result of "living with the void and reality".This paper explains the elements and interaction in the traditional aesthetic function, and explains the aesthetic value according to the relationship among the subject, object and subject and object in the theory of value.Based on the above mentioned foundation, this paper constructs the aesthetic value recognition framework of Chinese famous mountains and scenic spots, and explains the main body difference and diachronic characteristics of the framework, and their respective recognition results.The aesthetic value of subject difference is to examine the aesthetic value of different subjects to the same object at the same time.The aesthetic value of different subjects can be obtained by distinguishing the aesthetic value of different subjects.Diachronic aesthetic recognition is to examine the aesthetic value of different subjects as a whole to the same object at different times.Diachronic aesthetic recognition of aesthetic in the history of change and inheritance.The recognition framework of aesthetic value itself has hierarchy, so aesthetic value recognition also has hierarchy.Then, through the methods of inductive deduction, comparative study and content analysis, the paper constructs the key steps, methods and indicators in the framework of aesthetic value recognition.Aesthetic value recognition is still from the subject difference and diachronic two dimensions.In the identification of the aesthetic value of the main body's difference, the main subject's aesthetic value is identified by the weight distribution, and the different levels of aesthetic value and the corresponding carrier are identified by establishing the identification method and index.In the identification of diachronic aesthetic value, this paper constructs the analytical theory of poetry and text and image analysis to identify the diachronic aesthetic value, and determines the aesthetic value worth inheriting through the comparative study of ancient and modern.On the basis of value recognition, the framework of aesthetic value protection based on value recognition is constructed.Suggestions are put forward for the management and planning of the aesthetic value protection of famous scenic spots in China from the macroscopic land and single scenic spot level.Three key steps and related methods are put forward to establish the object of protection, to identify the influencing factors and sensitivity, and to formulate the protective measures and demonstration measures.The protection framework based on the recognition of aesthetic value responds to the problem that the object of protection is too broad and the protection has no pertinence.Finally, taking Huangshan scenic spots as an example, the paper verifies the fundamental difference between Huangshan aesthetic value and the OUV evaluation of the World Heritage site, as well as the difference of protection objects and measures according to the newly constructed aesthetic value recognition and protection framework.Then it proves the feasibility of the aesthetic value recognition and protection framework, and further puts forward the limitations and shortcomings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：清華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.18
，

本文編號(hào)：1719267