本文選題：鄉(xiāng)村　切入點(diǎn)：集體記憶　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：鄉(xiāng)村公共空間作為鄉(xiāng)村空間中最為核心的部分,是村民日常生活交往的重要場(chǎng)所,是鄉(xiāng)土記憶產(chǎn)生與延續(xù)的重要載體。它涉及農(nóng)民日常的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化與生活的諸多方面,對(duì)于農(nóng)民的生活和鄉(xiāng)村的和諧穩(wěn)定發(fā)展具有重要的意義。 然而隨著“現(xiàn)代性”因素的滲透,鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)不再是封閉、同質(zhì)的世界,鄉(xiāng)村生活發(fā)生巨變。自2006年的新農(nóng)村建設(shè)開(kāi)展以來(lái),國(guó)內(nèi)既有鄉(xiāng)村聚落的公共空間新建與改造建設(shè),大多照搬照抄城市的模式,而往往忽視了鄉(xiāng)村當(dāng)?shù)毓逃械纳盍?xí)慣、禮儀習(xí)俗和文化特色。然而城市公共空間的特征、規(guī)模、使用需求都與當(dāng)下鄉(xiāng)村的實(shí)際情況有著較大的差異,不加調(diào)整直接套用城市模式所帶來(lái)的后果就是：傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村公共空間消失殆盡,既有鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力不足,村民的公共活動(dòng)空間作為鄉(xiāng)土記憶的載體面臨重構(gòu)危機(jī)。而在新村規(guī)劃建設(shè)中所產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題更加嚴(yán)重。一些地方的新村規(guī)劃直接就畫(huà)格子、填色塊、賦指標(biāo)。這種僵化的棋盤(pán)在規(guī)劃執(zhí)行過(guò)程中再被填充以形色各異的建筑,“只建新房,不建新村”的結(jié)果必然是一種形散神離的拼貼,也直接導(dǎo)致了鄉(xiāng)土記憶的斷層、家園歸屬感的缺失。 為應(yīng)對(duì)現(xiàn)今新農(nóng)村建設(shè)過(guò)程中所面臨的問(wèn)題與挑戰(zhàn),本文立足于當(dāng)今鄉(xiāng)村公共空間建設(shè)的現(xiàn)狀問(wèn)題的研究,對(duì)空間及社會(huì)活動(dòng)問(wèn)題表象之下的原因進(jìn)行了剖析,并通過(guò)對(duì)鄉(xiāng)土記憶理論體系的研究與探索,提出：基于鄉(xiāng)土記憶的鄉(xiāng)村公共空間營(yíng)建不是簡(jiǎn)單的保留過(guò)去的物質(zhì)空間,也不是簡(jiǎn)單的復(fù)刻傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村的營(yíng)建模式,更不是一個(gè)或幾個(gè)象征符號(hào)的拼貼,而是將各種相關(guān)記憶要素置于適宜措施的調(diào)控下,并把握其內(nèi)在秩序,適應(yīng)環(huán)境的變化動(dòng)態(tài)演進(jìn),使鄉(xiāng)村公共空間場(chǎng)所喚醒記憶的同時(shí),也能夠符合現(xiàn)今鄉(xiāng)村居民在生活、交往上的需求,從而構(gòu)建起在當(dāng)下社會(huì)具有生命力的鄉(xiāng)土記憶,營(yíng)建出富有活力的鄉(xiāng)村公共空間。為此本文根據(jù)鄉(xiāng)土記憶理論的相關(guān)研究,總結(jié)提出“存儲(chǔ)—提取—組織—再現(xiàn)”的鄉(xiāng)村公共空間營(yíng)建路徑,并結(jié)合實(shí)例進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,望能在鄉(xiāng)村生活逐漸去村莊化的當(dāng)下,延續(xù)地域文脈,再造鄉(xiāng)土特質(zhì),喚醒鄉(xiāng)土記憶,為村民尋回失落的鄉(xiāng)村認(rèn)同感與歸屬感。
[Abstract]:As the most core part of rural space, rural public space is an important place for villagers to communicate with each other in daily life and an important carrier for the generation and continuation of local memory. It involves many aspects of farmers' daily economy, politics, culture and life. It is of great significance to the life of farmers and the harmonious and stable development of villages. However, with the permeation of "modernity", the rural society is no longer closed, homogenous world, rural life has changed dramatically. Since 2006, the new rural construction, the existing rural settlements of public space construction and reconstruction, Most of them copy the urban model, often neglecting the native living habits, etiquette and cultural characteristics of rural areas. However, the characteristics and scale of urban public space, There are great differences between the demand for use and the actual situation of the current rural areas. The consequences of applying the urban model directly without adjustment are that the traditional rural public space has disappeared, and the existing rural public space is lacking in vitality. The villagers' public activity space, as the carrier of the local memory, is facing the crisis of reconstruction. However, the problems in the planning and construction of the new village are even more serious. In some places, the new village planning directly draws the grid and fills in the color blocks. This rigid chessboard is filled with buildings of different shapes and colors in the process of planning and execution. The result of "building only new houses, not building new villages" is bound to be a form and scattered collage, which also directly leads to a fault of local memory. The lack of a sense of belonging at home. In order to deal with the problems and challenges in the construction of new countryside, this paper, based on the study of the present situation of rural public space construction, analyzes the causes of the problems in space and social activities. And through the research and exploration of the theory system of rural memory, it is pointed out that the construction of rural public space based on local memory is not a simple preservation of the past material space, nor is it a simple reconstruction of the traditional rural construction mode. Even more, it is not the collage of one or more symbols, but it puts all kinds of relevant memory elements under the control of appropriate measures, and grasps its internal order, adapts to the dynamic evolution of the environment, and makes the rural public space place wake up the memory at the same time. It can also meet the needs of the rural residents in their daily life and communication, so as to construct the rural memory with vitality in the present society and to build a dynamic rural public space. Therefore, according to the relevant research of the theory of rural memory, Summing up and putting forward the "storage-extract-organization-reappearance" path of rural public space construction, and combining with examples to carry out empirical research, hoping to continue the regional context and reinvent the local characteristics in the present time when rural life is gradually disappearing from villages. Awaken the local memory, for the villagers to find the lost sense of rural identity and belonging.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU982.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭于華;口述歷史——有關(guān)記憶與忘卻[J];讀書(shū);2003年10期

2 馬永強(qiáng);;重建鄉(xiāng)村公共文化空間的意義與實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年03期

3 王東;王勇;李廣斌;;功能與形式視角下的鄉(xiāng)村公共空間演變及其特征研究[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2013年02期

4 王勇;李廣斌;;裂變與再生:蘇南鄉(xiāng)村公共空間轉(zhuǎn)型研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2014年07期

5 鄭生鋼;;徽州傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村聚落文化的生態(tài)價(jià)值——兼及對(duì)新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的啟示[J];黃山學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

6 白子仙;;集體記憶理論經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究的七個(gè)維度:1989—2009[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年06期

7 業(yè)祖潤(rùn);現(xiàn)代住區(qū)環(huán)境設(shè)計(jì)與傳統(tǒng)聚落文化——傳統(tǒng)聚落環(huán)境精神文化形態(tài)探析[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

8 朱海龍;哈貝馬斯的公共領(lǐng)域與中國(guó)農(nóng)村公共空間[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2005年05期

9 胡靜;許賢棠;謝雙玉;;論鄉(xiāng)村旅游資源的可持續(xù)開(kāi)發(fā)利用[J];農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化研究;2007年06期

10 張軻;張弘;侯正華;;西藏林芝南迦巴瓦接待站[J];時(shí)代建筑;2009年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 浦欣成;傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村聚落二維平面整體形態(tài)的量化方法研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1598399