本文關(guān)鍵詞： 綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施評(píng)估 社區(qū)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施 生態(tài)評(píng)估 指標(biāo)　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：針對(duì)我國(guó)城市資源短缺、生態(tài)污染嚴(yán)重這一嚴(yán)峻形勢(shì),生態(tài)文明建設(shè)作為我國(guó)一項(xiàng)戰(zhàn)略決策被寫(xiě)入新的五年計(jì)劃中。而綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)是構(gòu)建城市生態(tài)文明的重要組成部分。目前我國(guó)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施評(píng)估相關(guān)研究主要集中在區(qū)域尺度,社區(qū)尺度的研究起步較晚,量化評(píng)估并不全面,所涉及的量化指標(biāo)數(shù)量少,涵蓋范圍窄。已有量化指標(biāo)主要以綠地率、人均公共綠地面積以及公共綠地內(nèi)的喬灌比例這3類(lèi)為核心,忽略了綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的生態(tài)特性�；诖�,本文針對(duì)我國(guó)當(dāng)前社區(qū)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施評(píng)估不足,評(píng)估手段缺失等問(wèn)題,通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)梳理,得到初步指標(biāo)集合。再依托調(diào)研問(wèn)卷對(duì)指標(biāo)集合進(jìn)行篩選,依據(jù)生態(tài)學(xué)原理對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行重分類(lèi)。最后,以哈爾濱市秋林地區(qū)為例,通過(guò)規(guī)劃前后秋林地區(qū)得分情況的對(duì)比,進(jìn)行指標(biāo)的校核與檢測(cè)。通過(guò)研究國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)、法規(guī)等,選出國(guó)內(nèi)外認(rèn)可度高且具有權(quán)威性的評(píng)估體系共9個(gè),國(guó)外主要是實(shí)際項(xiàng)目推廣體系,國(guó)內(nèi)則是國(guó)家頒布的法規(guī)。對(duì)這9個(gè)評(píng)估體系中的指標(biāo)依據(jù)頻度、重要程度和與社區(qū)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施生態(tài)評(píng)估的相關(guān)性等原則進(jìn)行指標(biāo)篩選,初步得到35個(gè)評(píng)估指標(biāo)。為了提高評(píng)估指標(biāo)的準(zhǔn)確性與完整性,采用調(diào)研問(wèn)卷的形式,對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行篩選。受訪(fǎng)人群主要是規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)師、景觀(guān)生態(tài)學(xué)專(zhuān)家和不同生態(tài)環(huán)境住區(qū)內(nèi)的使用者。通過(guò)受訪(fǎng)人群的反饋意見(jiàn),對(duì)上述35個(gè)評(píng)估指標(biāo),從不同角度分析篩選,最終剩余21個(gè)評(píng)估指標(biāo)。通過(guò)研究景觀(guān)生態(tài)學(xué)、生態(tài)安全格局、景觀(guān)異質(zhì)性、生態(tài)績(jī)效以及社會(huì)學(xué)等與綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施生態(tài)評(píng)估指標(biāo)分類(lèi)相關(guān)理論,一一對(duì)應(yīng)上述21個(gè)指標(biāo),解讀指標(biāo)的深層含義。并依此,從安全格局和生態(tài)績(jī)效兩方面對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行重分類(lèi)。安全格局類(lèi)是從廊道、斑塊及網(wǎng)絡(luò)特性3個(gè)角度反映綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施生態(tài)特性的;而生態(tài)績(jī)效則是通過(guò)量化綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,指導(dǎo)規(guī)劃的。再依據(jù)指標(biāo)的具體類(lèi)別得分情況,有針對(duì)性的對(duì)社區(qū)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施進(jìn)行規(guī)劃與完善。本文通過(guò)研究建立了一個(gè)針對(duì)社區(qū)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施生態(tài)評(píng)估指標(biāo)的定量化評(píng)估方法,從不同角度考慮社區(qū)生態(tài)環(huán)境所需,為我國(guó)社區(qū)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施生態(tài)規(guī)劃與設(shè)計(jì)提供依據(jù)。該指標(biāo)完善了以往社區(qū)規(guī)劃中欠缺的部分,為我國(guó)城市生態(tài)環(huán)境建設(shè)提供參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn),使我國(guó)在今后的社區(qū)生態(tài)規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)過(guò)程中,可參照此評(píng)估指標(biāo),指導(dǎo)社區(qū)生態(tài)建設(shè),促進(jìn)我國(guó)城市的生態(tài)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In view of our country city resources shortage, ecological pollution of this grim situation, the construction of ecological civilization is written as a new strategic decision in the five year plan. And green infrastructure construction is an important part of the construction of city ecological civilization. The green foundation of our facilities evaluation research mainly focused on the regional scale and the scale of community research started late, the quantitative evaluation is not comprehensive, quantitative indicators of quantity, scope is narrow. Quantitative indicators has been mainly to green rate, the per capita public green area and public green space in the proportion of the 3 kinds of shrubs as the core, ignoring the ecological characteristics of green infrastructure. Based on this, this paper in view of the current community green infrastructure assessment, assessment of lack of means, through the domestic and foreign literatures, the preliminary index set. Then relying on the questionnaire of index The set of screening indexes based on re classification of the principle of ecology. Finally, taking Harbin Qiulin area as an example, by comparing the scores before and after the planning Qiulin area, check and inspection index. Through the study of related literature at home and abroad, and regulations at home and abroad, choose the high degree of approval and authoritative evaluation system 9, the main foreign is the actual project promotion system, China is the country of law. According to the 9 frequency index in the evaluation system, index screening and degree of importance evaluation and community green infrastructure ecological relevance principle, 35 evaluation indexes obtained. In order to improve the accuracy and completeness of the evaluation index the use of research questionnaire of index screening. The surveyed population is mainly urban designers, landscape ecology and ecological environment of settlements of different experts within the user. By the feedback of the people, the 35 evaluation indexes from different angles of analysis and screening, the final remaining 21 evaluation indexes. Through the study of landscape ecology, ecological security pattern, landscape heterogeneity, ecological performance and sociology and green infrastructure ecological evaluation index classification theory, corresponding to the above 21 indicators the deep meaning, interpretation of indicators. And then, re classified from the security pattern and ecological performance index. The two aspects of security pattern is from the corridor, 3 angles of plaque and network characteristics reflect green infrastructure and ecological characteristics; and ecological performance is quantified through green infrastructure planning. On the basis of the specific category score index, targeted to the community of green infrastructure and perfect planning. This paper established a community green infrastructure for ecological assessment The method of quantitative assessment index, required from different perspectives to consider the community ecological environment, provide the basis for our country community green infrastructure, ecological planning and design. The index improved the previous lack of community planning in part, to provide a reference standard for the construction of the ecological environment of city of our country, make our country in the community ecological planning and design process in the future, can refer to this evaluation index, guide the construction of community ecology, promote ecological sustainable development of our city.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU985.125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金云峰;王小燁;;綠地資源及評(píng)價(jià)體系研究與探討[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2014年01期

2 陳利頂;孫然好;劉海蓮;;城市景觀(guān)格局演變的生態(tài)環(huán)境效應(yīng)研究進(jìn)展[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

3 齊楊;鄔建國(guó);李建龍;于洋;彭福利;孫聰;;中國(guó)東西部中小城市景觀(guān)格局及其驅(qū)動(dòng)力[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

4 裴丹;;綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施構(gòu)建方法研究述評(píng)[J];城市規(guī)劃;2012年05期

5 許文雯;孫翔;朱曉東;宗躍光;李楊帆;;基于生態(tài)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析的南京主城區(qū)重要生態(tài)斑塊識(shí)別[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

6 賀煒;劉濱誼;;有關(guān)綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的重思[J];中國(guó)園林;2011年01期

7 張晉石;;綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施——城市空間與環(huán)境問(wèn)題的系統(tǒng)化解決途徑[J];現(xiàn)代城市研究;2009年11期

8 付喜娥;吳人韋;;綠色基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施評(píng)價(jià)(GIA)方法介述——以美國(guó)馬里蘭州為例[J];中國(guó)園林;2009年09期

9 葉得富;陳元元;;對(duì)城市居住區(qū)規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范中公共綠地的認(rèn)識(shí)[J];山西建筑;2008年34期

10 常青;王仰麟;李雙成;;中小城鎮(zhèn)綠色空間評(píng)價(jià)與格局優(yōu)化——以山東省即墨市為例[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2007年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：1461543