本文關(guān)鍵詞：哈爾濱市盛世江南小區(qū)園林植物景觀評(píng)價(jià)　出處：《東北林業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 哈爾濱 盛世江南小區(qū) 居住區(qū)植物景觀 景觀評(píng)價(jià)

【摘要】：本研究對(duì)哈爾濱市盛世江南小區(qū)園林景觀進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),以植物景觀評(píng)價(jià)為核心,并以具代表性的潤(rùn)園小區(qū)和溪樹(shù)庭院小區(qū)作為對(duì)比,以期總結(jié)寒區(qū)哈爾濱市居住區(qū)景觀的特點(diǎn)及建設(shè)中常見(jiàn)的問(wèn)題,并提出有效的解決建議。本文首先對(duì)盛世江南小區(qū)園林景觀進(jìn)行定性分析,再運(yùn)用定量的方法對(duì)盛世江南小區(qū)和兩對(duì)比小區(qū)進(jìn)行美學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)、特征評(píng)價(jià)、功能評(píng)價(jià)和生態(tài)評(píng)價(jià)；并應(yīng)用層次模糊分析模型對(duì)三個(gè)小區(qū)的園林景觀進(jìn)行了綜合評(píng)價(jià),并對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析,提出了合理化建議。結(jié)果如下：1.盛世江南小區(qū)的園林景觀美學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)包括形式美、意境美。評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果為：形式美6.54、意境美4.24,綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分為56.84分。兩對(duì)比小區(qū)(依次為潤(rùn)園小區(qū)和溪樹(shù)庭院小區(qū))評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果分別為：6.57、3.42,7.19、4.73；綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分分別為55.63分、64.23分。三個(gè)小區(qū)的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果普遍顯示形式美要優(yōu)于意境美,說(shuō)明哈爾濱市居住區(qū)景觀建設(shè)由于經(jīng)濟(jì)原因和缺乏先進(jìn)理念對(duì)于深層次景觀美的重視不足。2.盛世江南小區(qū)的園林景觀特征評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)包括時(shí)代特征、地域自然特征、地域歷史文化特征指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià),評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果為時(shí)代特征5.48、地域自然特征3.74、地域文化歷史特征3.24,綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分為51.88分；兩對(duì)比小區(qū)(依次為潤(rùn)園小區(qū)和溪樹(shù)庭院小區(qū))評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果分別為：6.31、3.04、3.20,7.03、4.50、4.42；綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分分別為53.71分、61.95分。三個(gè)小區(qū)的時(shí)代特征均優(yōu)于其他兩指標(biāo),說(shuō)明哈爾濱市居住區(qū)景觀對(duì)于地域自然特征的注重和對(duì)于歷史文化的尊重和傳承不夠。3.盛世江南小區(qū)的園林景觀功能評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)包括綠地交通通暢性、活動(dòng)場(chǎng)所豐富性、空間場(chǎng)所舒適性、設(shè)施豐富適用性、景觀照明合理性、空間可識(shí)別性,綜合評(píng)分為65.65分,對(duì)比小區(qū)的綜合評(píng)分分別為66.52分、76.65分。說(shuō)明哈爾濱市居住區(qū)園林景觀功能合理性處于中上水平,在初步滿足居民使用的基礎(chǔ)上還應(yīng)從活動(dòng)場(chǎng)所的豐富性和舒適性、設(shè)施豐富度等方面加以提高。4.盛世江南小區(qū)的園林景觀生態(tài)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)包括綠化覆蓋率、單位面積喬木占有量、苗木規(guī)格、生長(zhǎng)狀況、物種多樣性和生活型多樣性,綜合評(píng)分為61.75,對(duì)比小區(qū)的綜合評(píng)分分別為76.47分、85.47分。說(shuō)明哈爾濱市居住區(qū)園林景觀生態(tài)效益處于中上水平,但尚需要對(duì)綠化覆蓋率、物種豐富度和苗木質(zhì)量等方面進(jìn)行優(yōu)化。5.盛世江南小區(qū)和兩對(duì)比小區(qū)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分分別為60.88分、64.57分、73.83分。說(shuō)明哈爾濱市居住區(qū)園林景觀質(zhì)量基本處于中上水平,還有很大的提高空間,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展、理念的更新和施工過(guò)程更加嚴(yán)格和規(guī)范,哈爾濱市居住區(qū)園林景觀在以上方面會(huì)有較大提升。
[Abstract]:This study evaluates the Harbin Shengshi Jiangnan residential landscape, the evaluation of plant landscape as the core, and the representative of the district and run park Creek tree garden district as a comparison, in order to summarize the common problems and construction of residential landscape in Harbin City, and puts forward some effective suggestions. Firstly, the qualitative analysis of the golden age of Jiangnan landscape area, and then use the quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetics, the golden age of Jiangnan District and two plot comparative characterization evaluation, function evaluation and ecological evaluation; and the application of fuzzy analysis on three residential landscape evaluation, and the evaluation results were compared and analyzed, put forward reasonable suggestions. The results are as follows: the landscape aesthetic evaluation index of the 1. golden age of Jiangnan district including the beauty of form, the beauty of artistic conception. The evaluation results are as follows: 6.54 the formal beauty of artistic conception. The 4.24, the comprehensive evaluation score of 56.84. Two compared with residential (are run park area and Creek Tree Garden District) evaluation results are as follows: 6.57,3.42,7.19,4.73; comprehensive evaluation scores were 55.63 points, 64.23 points. The evaluation of three small results generally show the beauty of form is superior to the beauty of artistic conception, Harbin city residential landscape the construction for economic reasons and lack of advanced ideas for landscape features index deep landscape beautiful Jiangnan area of flourishing.2. lack of attention including the characteristics of the times, geographical characteristics, regional historical culture characteristic index evaluation, the evaluation results of the characteristics of the times 5.48, 3.74 regional natural features, characteristics of regional culture history 3.24, the comprehensive evaluation score is 51.88 the two district (; contrast were run park area and Creek Tree Garden District) evaluation results are as follows: 6.31,3.04,3.20,7.03,4.50,4.42; comprehensive evaluation Score was 53.71 points, 61.95 points. The characteristics of the times of three communities were better than the other two indicators, Harbin city residential landscape on the regional natural features and focus on landscape function evaluation indicators including the green traffic flow and respect for historical and cultural heritage is not.3. Shengshi Jiangnan area, rich activities, space comfort, landscape lighting facilities rich applicability, rationality, space identification, comprehensive score of 65.65 points, compared to residential comprehensive score was 66.52 points, 76.65 points. It shows the landscape function rationality of residence in Harbin city is in the upper level, in the preliminary basis for residents to use also should place the richness and comfort, to improve the ecological landscape evaluation index.4. of the golden age of Jiangnan district including green coverage facilities richness etc., trees per unit area Share and seedling growth status, species diversity and life type diversity, comprehensive score of 61.75, compared to residential comprehensive score was 76.47 points, 85.47 points. Harbin city residential landscape ecological benefits in the upper level, but still need coverage on aspects of greening, species richness and seedling quality for comprehensive evaluation of optimization of.5. the golden age of Jiangnan residential and two contrast District scores were 60.88 points, 64.57 points, 73.83 points. The quality of residential landscape in Harbin city is in the upper level, there is a great increase in space, with the development of economy, updating and construction process of the concept of more rigorous and standardized, Harbin city residential landscape in these areas has greatly improved.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉志強(qiáng);洪亙偉;;我國(guó)園林綠化評(píng)價(jià)研究進(jìn)展及展望[J];北方園藝;2012年14期

2 俞孔堅(jiān);自然風(fēng)景質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)研究——BIB-LCJ審美評(píng)判測(cè)量法[J];北京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1988年02期

3 張偉明;吳艷芹;趙明實(shí);;寒地城市社區(qū)組合式冰基礎(chǔ)運(yùn)動(dòng)設(shè)施開(kāi)發(fā)構(gòu)想[J];工業(yè)設(shè)計(jì);2009年01期

4 張碩,陳其兵,侯萬(wàn)儒,高素萍;居住區(qū)環(huán)境綠化質(zhì)量的評(píng)價(jià)方案與方法[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2005年01期

5 劉雁;;北方寒冷地區(qū)城市景觀設(shè)計(jì)[J];今日科苑;2009年06期

6 喬麗芳;張毅川;齊安國(guó);;基于因子分析和聚類分析的居住區(qū)綠地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)及分類——以中國(guó)新鄉(xiāng)市為例(英文)[J];Journal of Forestry Research;2008年04期

7 鄒建勤;宋丁全;;定量AHP模型在城市居住區(qū)植物景觀評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];金陵科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

8 WANG Yichuan;MA Lianjing;LIU Yang;;Application of Chinese Landscape Painting Ambience in Modern Residential Landscape[J];Journal of Landscape Research;2012年10期

9 樸玉順;寒地居住區(qū)中心綠地設(shè)計(jì)[J];沈陽(yáng)建筑工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

10 劉燦然,馬克平,于順利,王巍;北京東靈山地區(qū)植物群落多樣性的研究 Ⅳ.樣本大小對(duì)多樣性測(cè)度的影響[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);1997年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張公保;北京居住區(qū)室外園林景觀評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系初探[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

2 睢志強(qiáng);居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評(píng)價(jià)[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

3 齊鈺;哈爾濱市群力新區(qū)公園景觀特色評(píng)價(jià)[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1421683