分類資本流動與匯率制度——來自162個經(jīng)濟體的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)
發(fā)布時間:2018-11-06 10:24
【摘要】:本文根據(jù)三種不同標準,對資本流動進行了細分,并以全球162個經(jīng)濟體(1974-2010年)為樣本,考察了不同類型的資本流動對匯率制度選擇的影響。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),組合投資資本、短期資本和權(quán)益資本流動程度越高的經(jīng)濟體越傾向于選擇更有彈性的匯率制度,而其余四類資本流動——FDI資本流動、其他資本流動、長期資本流動和債務(wù)資本流動則對匯率制度選擇沒有顯著影響。采用Reihart Rogoff(2004)、Levy-Yeyati Strurzenegger(2005)、Shambaugh(2004)等不同的匯率制度分類方法或者采用不同計量模型并不改變本文的研究結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:In this paper, capital flows are subdivided according to three different criteria, and the effects of different types of capital flows on the choice of exchange rate regimes are investigated with 162 economies (1974-2010) as samples. It is found that the economies with higher degree of portfolio capital, short-term capital and equity capital flow tend to choose more flexible exchange rate regimes, while the other four types of capital flows-FDI capital flows, other capital flows, Long-term capital flows and debt capital flows have no significant effect on the choice of exchange rate regime. Using Reihart Rogoff (2004), Levy-Yeyati Strurzenegger (2005), Shambaugh (2004) and other different classification methods of exchange rate regime or adopting different econometric models does not change the conclusion of this paper.
【作者單位】: 西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)金融學(xué)院;西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)金融學(xué)院金融系;西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)中國金融研究中心;
【基金】:教育部人文社會科學(xué)基金青年項目“利益集團對人民幣匯率制度彈性的影響研究”(15XJC790007);教育部人文社會科學(xué)重點研究基地重大項目“人民幣匯率制度彈性的測度、影響因素及其經(jīng)濟績效研究”(15JJD790028)資助
【分類號】:F832.6
[Abstract]:In this paper, capital flows are subdivided according to three different criteria, and the effects of different types of capital flows on the choice of exchange rate regimes are investigated with 162 economies (1974-2010) as samples. It is found that the economies with higher degree of portfolio capital, short-term capital and equity capital flow tend to choose more flexible exchange rate regimes, while the other four types of capital flows-FDI capital flows, other capital flows, Long-term capital flows and debt capital flows have no significant effect on the choice of exchange rate regime. Using Reihart Rogoff (2004), Levy-Yeyati Strurzenegger (2005), Shambaugh (2004) and other different classification methods of exchange rate regime or adopting different econometric models does not change the conclusion of this paper.
【作者單位】: 西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)金融學(xué)院;西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)金融學(xué)院金融系;西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)中國金融研究中心;
【基金】:教育部人文社會科學(xué)基金青年項目“利益集團對人民幣匯率制度彈性的影響研究”(15XJC790007);教育部人文社會科學(xué)重點研究基地重大項目“人民幣匯率制度彈性的測度、影響因素及其經(jīng)濟績效研究”(15JJD790028)資助
【分類號】:F832.6
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 張t,
本文編號:2314004
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/huobiyinxinglunwen/2314004.html
最近更新
教材專著