中蒙兩國商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理對比研究
[Abstract]:Before the 1990s, the product types and business structure of the global commercial banking industry were relatively single, the degree of electronization was relatively low, the business scale was small, the competition in the same industry was not too intense, and the internal management was relatively strict. So the problem of operational risk in banks is not very serious. After the operation risk loss is relatively small. After the 1990s, the global commercial banks' product business is diversified, the technical momentum is swift and violent, the interbank competition intensifies, the operational risk problem becomes more and more prominent. Especially in recent years, there is a trend of acceleration. By the end of 2016, as the top four banks in the world in terms of total capital, they are Chinese commercial banks, which face increasing competition and complexity. All Chinese commercial banks are expanding their operation scale and trading scope. And try to innovate services and products, expect to be in a tough competitive environment. With the increasing attention to the operational risk of commercial banks and the occurrence of financial crisis, the understanding of operational risk in the Basel Accord has been constantly improved, and operational risk management has become a topic of worldwide commercial banks' attention. With the introduction of the concept of "operational risk management", more and more experts and scholars at home and abroad have taken this new theory as the research object, among which, Basel has made great contributions to the development of the theory. With the further development of the research, new research results have emerged, including the definition, type and measurement of operational risk. This paper makes a theoretical exploration on the operational risk management of commercial banks, compares the operational risk management of Chinese commercial banks with that of Mongolian commercial banks, and bases on the operational management process of commercial banks in China and Mongolia. Fully study and analyze the operational risk management organization system and operational risk management status and existing problems of commercial banks, and compare the relevant management strategies and mechanisms between China and Mongolia commercial banks; Based on the operational risk management process model from the perspective of commercial banks of China and Mongolia, this paper explores and analyzes the different risk management links, such as operational risk identification, risk assessment, risk handling and risk monitoring, and the major events that occurred in April 2017. This paper studies the case of 3 billion yuan of China Minsheng Bank, and the case of internal fraud of John Bank, one of the largest commercial banks in Mongolia. Finally, on the basis of the theory of operational risk management, Based on the specific strategies and mechanisms of operational risk management of Chinese commercial banks, the operational risk management process of Mongolian commercial banks is improved, and effective countermeasures and suggestions are put forward for the operational risk management of Mongolian commercial banks. On the one hand, it is expected that some of the research results in this paper can bring some theoretical reference and decision support to the operational risk management and mechanism innovation of Mongolian commercial banks. On the other hand, it also provides a theoretical reference and supplement for the operational risk management theory of commercial banks from different perspectives.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F832.33;F833.11
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周明山;;我國商業(yè)銀行內(nèi)部風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制研究[J];企業(yè)改革與管理;2017年03期
2 周剛;;國內(nèi)商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理現(xiàn)狀及應(yīng)對策略[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2017年02期
3 黃芳;;M農(nóng)村商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理探析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2016年18期
4 李文婷;萬幼清;;我國商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析及管理——以中國農(nóng)業(yè)銀行某支行為例[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年16期
5 梁璐;;商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理淺議[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2016年06期
6 王揚(yáng);路萍;;我國商業(yè)銀行組織架構(gòu)分析研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2016年03期
7 于晨;周瑋;;商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)損失計(jì)量路徑與方法探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2014年02期
8 吳雪;;我國銀行業(yè)實(shí)施操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)高級計(jì)量法存在的困難[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(下);2013年10期
9 錢浩輝;徐學(xué)鋒;;我國商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理問題解析[J];浙江金融;2011年12期
10 方芳,秦天保;商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估——使用網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析法[J];管理科學(xué);2005年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 何花;我國商業(yè)銀行私人銀行業(yè)務(wù)操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年
2 孟佳琪;我國商業(yè)銀行國際化經(jīng)營的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問題研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2016年
3 張磊;我國商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理問題研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2016年
4 許婷婷;商業(yè)銀行運(yùn)營流程再造操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年
5 蒙德(Mend-Amar Munkhbaatar);蒙中銀行體制對比分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年
6 陳召敏;中國農(nóng)業(yè)銀行運(yùn)營管理體系研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2013年
7 周志鵬;國內(nèi)外商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
8 王月瑋;商業(yè)銀行運(yùn)營操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
9 劉張發(fā);商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量方法比較研究[D];云南大學(xué);2010年
10 柴鵬飛;中外商業(yè)銀行操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理比較研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:2163254
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/huobiyinxinglunwen/2163254.html