本文關(guān)鍵詞：青島市科技金融模式及其效率研究　出處：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 科技金融 模式比較 效率評價 DEA-Tobit

【摘要】：近年來,科技金融已成為解決我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展速度放緩的有效途徑,目前,我國科技金融尚處于發(fā)展完善和深化階段,與發(fā)達國家相比,我國科技金融發(fā)展水平仍然較低。青島市作為全國首批科技金融試點城市,在科技金融發(fā)展過程中同樣也存在不少問題,因此,提高科技金融效率對青島市經(jīng)濟發(fā)展具有十分重要的意義。為此,本文擬基于科技金融效率的視角,對青島市科技金融模式及效率進行深入研究,并針對影響其效率的因素提出一系列對策建議。借鑒前人對科技金融及其效率的定義,對比分析國內(nèi)外先進的科技金融模式,結(jié)合青島市科技金融模式及發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,研究分析青島市在科技金融發(fā)展過程中所存在融資難、風險防范能力低,杠桿率低以及科技金融產(chǎn)品及品牌缺乏等一系列突出問題。在此基礎(chǔ)上采用DEA-Tobit兩步法,分別從金融投入和科技產(chǎn)出兩個層面對科技金融效率進行測度,并從企業(yè)、金融中介、政府三個角度對影響青島市科技金融效率的因素進行實證分析。實證研究結(jié)果表明,青島市科技金融效率較低,在科技金融試點城市中處于落后地位;其發(fā)展仍以政府為主,市場的作用未得到充分發(fā)揮;政府對科技金融發(fā)展的扶持效率較低,專項資金投入產(chǎn)出結(jié)構(gòu)不合理,政府對資金運用監(jiān)管不力。在理論分析與實證研究的基礎(chǔ)上,就如何提高青島市科技金融效率問題,分別從政府、金融機構(gòu)和企業(yè)三個層面提出如下政策建議:即政府應(yīng)發(fā)揮引導(dǎo)與服務(wù)功能,調(diào)整優(yōu)化金融投入資源配置,提高金融資源的使用效率;金融機構(gòu)應(yīng)優(yōu)化科技金融服務(wù);企業(yè)應(yīng)促進科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化,提升創(chuàng)新能力,突出隊伍建設(shè)等等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, science and technology finance has become an effective way to solve the slowdown of economic development in China. At present, China's science and technology finance is still in the stage of improvement and deepening, compared with developed countries. The level of development of science and technology finance in China is still low. As the first batch of pilot cities of science and technology finance in China, there are also many problems in the process of development of science and technology finance. To improve the efficiency of science and technology finance is of great significance to the economic development of Qingdao. Therefore, based on the perspective of the efficiency of science and technology finance, this paper makes an in-depth study on the model and efficiency of science and technology finance in Qingdao. According to the factors that affect its efficiency, a series of countermeasures and suggestions are put forward. Referring to the previous definitions of science and technology finance and its efficiency, this paper contrasts and analyzes the advanced scientific and technological finance models at home and abroad. Combined with the scientific and technological finance model and current situation of Qingdao, this paper analyzes the difficulty of financing and the low ability of risk prevention in the process of development of science and technology finance in Qingdao. A series of outstanding problems such as low leverage ratio and lack of technology and financial products and brands. On this basis, the DEA-Tobit two-step approach is adopted. It measures the efficiency of sci-tech finance from two aspects of financial input and scientific output, and measures the efficiency of sci-tech finance from enterprise and financial intermediary. The empirical results show that the efficiency of science and technology finance in Qingdao is low, and it is in a backward position in the pilot city of science and technology finance. Its development is still dominated by the government, the role of the market has not been given full play; The support efficiency of the government to the development of science and technology finance is low, the input-output structure of the special fund is unreasonable, and the government supervision on the use of funds is weak. On the basis of theoretical analysis and empirical research. On how to improve the efficiency of science and technology finance in Qingdao, this paper puts forward the following policy suggestions from the three levels of government, financial institutions and enterprises: the government should give play to the function of guidance and service, adjust and optimize the allocation of financial investment resources. Improving the efficiency of the use of financial resources; Financial institutions should optimize sci-tech financial services; Enterprises should promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, enhance the ability of innovation, highlight the construction of the ranks, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F832;F275

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜金岷;梁嶺;呂寒;;中國區(qū)域科技金融效率研究——基于三階段DEA模型分析[J];金融經(jīng)濟學(xué)研究;2016年06期

2 王勇;馮立;;多案例背景下的區(qū)域性科技金融平臺運作研究[J];科技管理研究;2016年08期

3 謝泗薪;張志博;;基于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)思維的科技金融服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展模式與攻略[J];中國科技論壇;2016年03期

4 許汝俊;龍子午;姚逍遙;;基于DEA-Malmquist指數(shù)法的科技金融發(fā)展效率評價研究——以長江經(jīng)濟帶為例[J];科技管理研究;2015年13期

5 曲昭;丁X;張春博;;基于文獻計量視角的科技金融政策研究[J];科技進步與對策;2015年13期

6 房漢廷;;科技金融本質(zhì)探析[J];中國科技論壇;2015年05期

7 胡新麗;吳開松;;光谷與硅谷:科技金融模式創(chuàng)新借鑒及路徑選擇[J];科技進步與對策;2014年09期

8 王朝平;石俊馬;蘭定成;;武漢市科技金融現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展對策[J];科技進步與對策;2013年20期

9 饒彩霞;唐五湘;周飛躍;;我國科技金融政策的分析與體系構(gòu)建[J];科技管理研究;2013年20期

10 季菲菲;陳雯;袁豐;孫偉;;高新區(qū)科技金融發(fā)展過程及其空間效應(yīng)——以無錫新區(qū)為例[J];地理研究;2013年10期

，

本文編號：1405829