本文選題：自由貿(mào)易區(qū) + 關(guān)稅壁壘�。� 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自20世紀(jì)90年代以來,隨著世界貿(mào)易組織(WTO)等多邊貿(mào)易組織發(fā)展緩慢,以雙邊或多邊的區(qū)域自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定(FTA)開始出現(xiàn)并持續(xù)壯大,使區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化和集團(tuán)化成為全球經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的新的趨勢。與世界其他區(qū)域的雙邊或多邊貿(mào)易協(xié)定快速發(fā)展不同,東亞區(qū)域的經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化發(fā)展進(jìn)程相對(duì)緩慢。中國、日本和韓國地處東亞,近年來,三國經(jīng)貿(mào)發(fā)展迅速,已經(jīng)成為亞洲乃至全球經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展新的增長點(diǎn)。同時(shí),中日韓作為全球重要的貿(mào)易國家,三國的經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)具有明顯的互補(bǔ)性,日本是本區(qū)域內(nèi)發(fā)達(dá)資本主義國家,擁有較為雄厚工業(yè)基礎(chǔ)和先進(jìn)的技術(shù)優(yōu)勢;韓國作為區(qū)域內(nèi)新生的工業(yè)化國家,相對(duì)于目前中國來說具有資金和技術(shù)的相對(duì)優(yōu)勢;而中國和日韓兩國相比,在資源、勞動(dòng)力以及市場等領(lǐng)域有著巨大的優(yōu)勢。三國間的經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)為中日韓開展經(jīng)貿(mào)合作創(chuàng)造了重要的條件,同時(shí)有利于三國的貨物貿(mào)易和技術(shù)投資。因此,推動(dòng)和促進(jìn)中日韓自貿(mào)區(qū)建設(shè)不僅對(duì)三國具有重要的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,而且對(duì)于東亞經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化也有著重要的戰(zhàn)略意義。但是自2012年三國正式啟動(dòng)中日韓自貿(mào)區(qū)談判以來,三國圍繞自貿(mào)區(qū)談判的進(jìn)程卻異常緩慢。究其原因,中日韓FTA的談判不僅要考慮經(jīng)濟(jì)層面的障礙,同時(shí)也要考慮非經(jīng)濟(jì)層面的成本—收益。為了能夠盡快建成中日韓自貿(mào)區(qū),本文對(duì)影響中日韓FTA談判的因素進(jìn)行了多方面、多層次的分析,并提出相應(yīng)的解決措施和方法,以便能夠早日完成中日韓FTA的談判。
[Abstract]:Since the 1990s, with the slow development of multilateral trade organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), regional free trade agreements (FTAs), such as bilateral or multilateral regional free trade agreements, have begun to emerge and continue to grow. Regional economic integration and collectivization have become a new trend of global economic development. Different from the rapid development of bilateral or multilateral trade agreements in other regions of the world, the process of economic integration in East Asia is relatively slow. China, Japan and South Korea are located in East Asia. In recent years, the three countries have witnessed rapid economic and trade development, which has become a new growth point for Asian and even global economic development. At the same time, as an important trading country in the world, the economic structure of the three countries is obviously complementary. Japan is a developed capitalist country in the region, with a strong industrial base and advanced technological advantages. South Korea, as a newly industrialized country in the region, has a comparative advantage in capital and technology compared with China, while China has a huge advantage in the fields of resources, labor force and market compared with Japan and South Korea. The economic structure of the three countries creates important conditions for the economic and trade cooperation between China, Japan and South Korea, and is conducive to the trade of goods and investment in technology among the three countries. Therefore, promoting and promoting the construction of China-Japan-Korea free trade zone not only has important economic interests for the three countries, but also has an important strategic significance for the economic integration of East Asia. But since 2012, when the three countries formally launched negotiations on a free trade zone between China, Japan and South Korea, the process of negotiations around the zone has been unusually slow. The reason is that the negotiation of FTA between China, Japan and South Korea should not only consider the obstacles in the economic level, but also the cost-benefit in the non-economic level. In order to build the FTA between China, Japan and South Korea as soon as possible, this paper analyzes the factors that affect the FTA negotiation between China, Japan and South Korea in many aspects, and puts forward the corresponding measures and methods, so that the negotiation between China, Japan and South Korea can be completed as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F742

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李相萬;;“薩德入韓”與東北亞的“安全困境”:基于新現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的分析[J];東北亞論壇;2016年06期

2 鄭毅;;中韓日“戰(zhàn)爭記憶”的差異與歷史認(rèn)識(shí)重構(gòu)[J];日本學(xué)刊;2016年03期

3 張建立;;淺析日本人的歷史認(rèn)識(shí)問題[J];國際政治研究;2015年06期

4 楊攻研;劉洪鐘;;政治關(guān)系、經(jīng)濟(jì)權(quán)力與貿(mào)易往來:來自東亞的證據(jù)~[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2015年12期

5 馮軍;陳琛;;亞太自由貿(mào)易區(qū)(FTAAP)問題的由來及影響[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年05期

6 周玉淵;;從東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)到東盟經(jīng)濟(jì)共同體:東盟經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2015年03期

7 劉沖;;美國醞釀在韓部署“薩德”系統(tǒng)問題辨析[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2015年05期

8 唐國強(qiáng);王震宇;;亞太自由貿(mào)易區(qū):路線圖與優(yōu)先任務(wù)[J];國際問題研究;2015年01期

9 鄺梅;;東亞FTA格局與中國的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];東北亞論壇;2015年01期

10 牛海霞;;歐盟共同農(nóng)業(yè)政策研究及啟示——基于農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展與政策效應(yīng)的角度[J];世界農(nóng)業(yè);2014年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉東旭;亞太自由貿(mào)易區(qū)實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2016年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄭燕;中日韓自貿(mào)區(qū)構(gòu)建研究[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 劉深詣;中日韓區(qū)域合作的進(jìn)程及前景分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2032067