本文選題：貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性 + 綜合貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性��； 參考：《青島科技大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)和俄羅斯是重要的貿(mào)易伙伴,也是新興工業(yè)國(guó)家中最大的兩大經(jīng)濟(jì)體。中俄兩國(guó)的相互貿(mào)易不斷增長(zhǎng),在出口方面俄羅斯是繼日本之后中國(guó)的第四大世界出口對(duì)象,同時(shí)從進(jìn)口角度來(lái)講,俄羅斯是中國(guó)第三大商品進(jìn)口對(duì)象。汪洋副總理在第八屆中俄工商界高峰論壇上指出,預(yù)計(jì)到2020年,中俄雙方的貿(mào)易總額將超過(guò)2000億美元。本文對(duì)中國(guó)和俄羅斯貿(mào)易的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性和互補(bǔ)性以及中俄的雙方貿(mào)易過(guò)程中的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析。在分析中俄貿(mào)易的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性和互補(bǔ)性的過(guò)程中,本文建立了雙邊貿(mào)易狀態(tài)坐標(biāo),橫坐標(biāo)代表兩國(guó)貿(mào)易的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性,其數(shù)值判斷以中俄貿(mào)易的出口相似度來(lái)代表；縱坐標(biāo)代表中俄兩國(guó)的貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性,其數(shù)值以綜合性貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性指數(shù)代表,綜合性貿(mào)易指數(shù)是本文在一定假設(shè)條件下,根據(jù)兩個(gè)國(guó)家產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易余額以及產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的比重為基礎(chǔ),測(cè)算的一個(gè)度量來(lái)兩國(guó)貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性的數(shù)據(jù)。雙邊貿(mào)易狀態(tài)坐標(biāo)顯示,中國(guó)和俄羅斯的貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性不斷降低,雙方的貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性指數(shù)從2004年的39.36下降到2013年的30.5。同時(shí),中俄雙方的貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性不斷加強(qiáng),表現(xiàn)為貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性指數(shù)從23.52上升到2013年的51.24,因此總體來(lái)看中俄兩國(guó)的外貿(mào)發(fā)展向著少對(duì)抗多互補(bǔ)的方向發(fā)展。在定性分析兩國(guó)貿(mào)易發(fā)展面臨的具體問(wèn)題時(shí),本文認(rèn)為中俄雙方的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化差異；“灰色清關(guān)”的問(wèn)題,通關(guān)手續(xù)復(fù)雜；雙邊貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)和貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量問(wèn)題突出；貿(mào)易服務(wù)體系配套不健全,雙邊貿(mào)易制度契合度低等問(wèn)題嚴(yán)重,制約了中俄兩國(guó)雙邊貿(mào)易的發(fā)展。針對(duì)這些問(wèn)題論文從以下角度提供了建議。首先,本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)該夯實(shí)中俄貿(mào)易的政治文化基礎(chǔ),為中俄貿(mào)易發(fā)展提供良好的環(huán)境；其次,需要促進(jìn)雙邊貿(mào)易制度的完善和秩序的規(guī)范；第三,應(yīng)該完善雙邊貿(mào)易設(shè)施和公共服務(wù)；第四,盡力改善雙邊的貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)并提高貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品的質(zhì)量。如果這些意見(jiàn)能夠得到落實(shí),中俄的雙邊貿(mào)易則會(huì)進(jìn)入到一個(gè)新的發(fā)展時(shí)期。
[Abstract]:China and Russia are important trading partners and the two largest emerging industrial economies. The mutual trade between China and Russia is growing, Russia is the fourth largest export object of China after Japan, and Russia is the third import object of Chinese goods from the point of view of import. Trade between China and Russia is expected to exceed $200 billion by 2020, Vice Premier Wang Yang said at the eighth China-Russia Business Summit. This paper analyzes the competition and complementarity between China and Russia and the problems in the process of trade between China and Russia. In the process of analyzing the competition and complementarity of Sino-Russian trade, this paper establishes the bilateral trade status coordinate, and the horizontal coordinate represents the competitiveness of the two countries' trade, and its numerical judgment is represented by the export similarity between China and Russia. The vertical coordinate represents the trade complementarity between China and Russia, and its value is represented by the comprehensive trade complementarity index, which is based on certain assumptions in this paper. Based on the balance of intra-industry trade and the proportion of intra-industry trade between the two countries, a measurement of trade complementarity between the two countries is presented. Bilateral trade status coordinates show that trade competitiveness between China and Russia is declining, from 39.36 in 2004 to 30.5 in 2013. At the same time, the trade complementarity between China and Russia has been strengthened, which shows that the index of trade complementarity has increased from 23.52 to 51.24 in 2013, so overall the development of foreign trade between China and Russia is towards the direction of less confrontation and more complementarity. In the qualitative analysis of the specific problems facing the development of trade between the two countries, this paper holds that the economic, political and cultural differences between China and Russia, the problem of "grey customs clearance", the complexity of customs clearance procedures, the outstanding problems of bilateral trade structure and the quality of trade products; The development of bilateral trade between China and Russia is restricted by some problems, such as imperfect trade service system and low compatibility of bilateral trade system. In view of these problems, the paper provides some suggestions from the following angles. First, this paper holds that the political and cultural foundation of Sino-Russian trade should be consolidated to provide a good environment for the development of Sino-Russian trade. Secondly, it is necessary to promote the perfection and order of the bilateral trade system. We should improve bilateral trade facilities and public services. Fourth, we should try our best to improve the bilateral trade structure and improve the quality of trade products. If these views are implemented, bilateral trade between China and Russia will enter a new period of development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F752.7;F755.12

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周茂榮;杜莉;;中國(guó)與美國(guó)貨物貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性的實(shí)證研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年09期

2 宣國(guó)江;;中國(guó)與巴西的貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性分析[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年10期

3 杜莉;謝皓;;中美貨物貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性強(qiáng)弱與性質(zhì)的動(dòng)態(tài)研究[J];中國(guó)軟科學(xué);2010年S1期

4 杜莉;謝皓;;中美貨物貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性強(qiáng)弱及性質(zhì)的動(dòng)態(tài)變化研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年04期

5 楊婷婷;;黑龍江與俄羅斯貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性實(shí)證研究[J];品牌(下半月);2012年03期

6 李練軍;鄔愛(ài)萍;;中國(guó)與加拿大貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性及潛力實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2012年16期

7 于津平;中國(guó)與東亞主要國(guó)家和地區(qū)間的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)與貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年05期

8 張建中;;廣西與越南貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性研究[J];東南亞縱橫;2006年01期

9 姚海華;;中國(guó)與東北亞主要國(guó)家農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性分析[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年09期

10 余少謙;;貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性比較優(yōu)勢(shì)指數(shù)的對(duì)比研究——以福建為例[J];閩江學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 徐妍;;中國(guó)新疆與俄羅斯貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性的實(shí)證分析[A];全國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)地理研究會(huì)第十三屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨金融危機(jī)背景下的中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展研討會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 中國(guó)醫(yī)藥保健品進(jìn)出口商會(huì) 陳婧婧 蔡天智;中美醫(yī)械貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性較強(qiáng)[N];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥報(bào);2012年

2 駐泰國(guó)使館經(jīng)商處 張志文;中泰貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性日趨成熟[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2001年

3 祖月　石杰;中新服務(wù)貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性強(qiáng)[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2010年

4 記者 亢舒;去年我與中亞4國(guó)貿(mào)易額突破400億美元[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 早報(bào)記者 張U，

本文編號(hào)：1958537