本文選題：中國 + 印度��； 參考：《哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,世界服務(wù)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展速度已遠遠超過了商品貿(mào)易的發(fā)展速度,其中增長最迅速的是服務(wù)外包。外包已經(jīng)成為一個全球趨勢,越來越多的企業(yè)為了集中內(nèi)部優(yōu)勢資源發(fā)展核心業(yè)務(wù),通過整合利用企業(yè)外部優(yōu)勢資源的方式而將非核心業(yè)務(wù)外包出去,以此達到降低成本,提高績效,提升企業(yè)核心競爭力的目的。中國和印度是世界主要的接包國,印度在承接服務(wù)外包方面取得了驕人的成績,是全球服務(wù)外包行業(yè)的標志,自20世紀90年代以來一直引領(lǐng)著全球服務(wù)外包的發(fā)展趨勢。中國和印度同為發(fā)展中國家有很多相似之處,但在承接服務(wù)外包方面中國和印度相比仍有很大差距。 論文以中印承接服務(wù)外包國際競爭力比較為研究對象,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外已有的相關(guān)研究成果及國際貿(mào)易相關(guān)理論,對中印承接服務(wù)外包的現(xiàn)狀進行分析,從定性和定量兩方面對中印承接服務(wù)外包的國際競爭力進行比較研究,定性分析利用修正后的“鉆石模型”,探討以政府為核心的影響中印兩國服務(wù)外包競爭力的各因子及其經(jīng)濟含義。在生產(chǎn)要素方面,中國的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和人力資源有較大優(yōu)勢,而印度則在地理位置和服務(wù)外包行業(yè)協(xié)會發(fā)展等方面具有較大優(yōu)勢。在需求條件方面,中國的國內(nèi)市場具有較大的發(fā)展?jié)摿�。在相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)與支持產(chǎn)業(yè)方面,中國具有基礎(chǔ)雄厚的制造業(yè)和較為完善的物流系統(tǒng),印度則在信息技術(shù)和金融業(yè)體制等方面更具優(yōu)勢。在企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略方面,印度服務(wù)外包的企業(yè)規(guī)模和開發(fā)能力,以及形成的品牌效應(yīng)都遠遠超過中國,在服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)的規(guī)劃和建設(shè)方面,也具有較大優(yōu)勢。在機會方面,印度的成本優(yōu)勢在逐漸減弱,中國在歐美和日韓市場將會有更大的發(fā)展空間。在政府方面,為推進服務(wù)外包的發(fā)展中印兩國政府都積極制定相關(guān)政策加大發(fā)展力度。定量分析主要是通過引入國際市場占有率指數(shù)(MS)、顯示性比較優(yōu)勢指數(shù)(RCA)和貿(mào)易競爭優(yōu)勢指數(shù)(TCI)來說明中印承接服務(wù)外包的競爭力。研究結(jié)果顯示目前印度在承接服務(wù)外包業(yè)務(wù)整體上具有比較優(yōu)勢,而在中印兩國承接服務(wù)外包的競爭力方面,印度要優(yōu)于中國。論文最后在借鑒印度承接服務(wù)外包的經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上提出提升中國承接服務(wù)外包國際競爭力的對策。
[Abstract]:With the development of global economy, the speed of the development of world trade in services has far exceeded the speed of the development of commodity trade, among which the fastest growth is the outsourcing of services. Outsourcing has become a global trend. In order to concentrate internal advantage resources and develop core business, more and more enterprises outsource non-core business in order to reduce costs by integrating and utilizing external advantage resources. To improve performance and enhance the core competitiveness of enterprises. China and India are the major contracting countries in the world. India has made remarkable achievements in service outsourcing and is the symbol of the global service outsourcing industry. It has been leading the development trend of global service outsourcing since 1990s. China and India share many similarities as developing countries, but there is still a big gap between China and India in outsourcing services. This paper takes the international competitiveness comparison between China and India to undertake service outsourcing as the research object, and analyzes the current situation of service outsourcing in China and India, combining with the existing research results and international trade related theories at home and abroad. From qualitative and quantitative aspects, this paper makes a comparative study on the international competitiveness of China and India to undertake service outsourcing, and qualitatively analyzes and uses the revised Diamond Model. This paper probes into the factors and economic implications of the government's influence on the competitiveness of service outsourcing between China and India. In terms of factors of production, China has great advantages in infrastructure and human resources, while India has great advantages in geographical location and development of service outsourcing industry associations. In terms of demand conditions, China's domestic market has greater development potential. In terms of related industries and supporting industries, China has a solid manufacturing industry and a relatively perfect logistics system, while India has more advantages in information technology and financial system. In terms of enterprise strategy, the scale, development ability and brand effect of service outsourcing in India are far more than those in China, and they also have great advantages in the planning and construction of service outsourcing industrial parks. On the opportunity side, India's cost advantage is waning, and China will have more room for growth in Europe, America and Japan and South Korea. On the government side, both China and India actively formulate relevant policies to promote the development of service outsourcing. The quantitative analysis mainly explains the competitiveness of service outsourcing between China and India by introducing international market share index (MSI), indicative comparative advantage index (RCA) and trade competitive advantage index (TCII). The results show that India has a comparative advantage in the service outsourcing business as a whole, and India is superior to China in the competitiveness of service outsourcing between China and India. Finally, based on the experience of India to undertake service outsourcing, the paper puts forward some countermeasures to enhance the international competitiveness of China to undertake service outsourcing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F752.68;F753.51

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 闕澄宇;柴淵哲;;中印承接國際服務(wù)外包競爭力比較研究[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2010年08期

2 呂延方;趙進文;;中國承接服務(wù)外包影響因素分析——基于多國面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證檢驗[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年07期

3 于立新;陳昭;江皎;;中國服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力研究——基于部分試點城市的分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年09期

4 趙楓;;軟件和服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力影響因素分析[J];電腦知識與技術(shù);2011年31期

5 王澤利;周升起;;中印兩國IT服務(wù)外包國際競爭力比較研究[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年09期

6 段曉丹;;中印兩國發(fā)展服務(wù)外包的比較分析[J];改革與開放;2009年05期

7 王曉紅;;實現(xiàn)服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)業(yè)的跨越發(fā)展與整體提升[J];國際貿(mào)易;2010年10期

8 吳國新;高長春;;服務(wù)外包理論演進研究綜述[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2008年02期

9 孫曉琴;;我國服務(wù)外包城市競爭力評價研究[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2008年07期

10 胡昭玲;王洋;;中國承接服務(wù)外包的影響因素分析[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2010年02期

，

本文編號：1861956