本文選題：貿(mào)易摩擦　切入點(diǎn)：貿(mào)易救濟(jì)措施　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在全球貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義盛行的背景下,反補(bǔ)貼作為世界貿(mào)易組織框架下的三大貿(mào)易救濟(jì)措施之一,越來(lái)越受到國(guó)際社會(huì)的關(guān)注。尤其是2008年世界性金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)以來(lái),反補(bǔ)貼這種貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的新武器更加頻繁的被使用。中國(guó)加入世貿(mào)組織以來(lái),對(duì)外貿(mào)易經(jīng)受住了考驗(yàn),實(shí)現(xiàn)了持續(xù)高速增長(zhǎng),同時(shí),也遭遇了大量的貿(mào)易摩擦,近年來(lái),除了反傾銷和保障措施以外,本不適用于“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)”國(guó)家的反補(bǔ)貼也不斷被我國(guó)的主要出口國(guó)采用,出現(xiàn)了越來(lái)越多針對(duì)我國(guó)出口產(chǎn)品的“雙反”案件。國(guó)外屢次對(duì)我國(guó)出口產(chǎn)品濫用反補(bǔ)貼,給我國(guó)外貿(mào)發(fā)展帶來(lái)嚴(yán)重不利影響,而我國(guó)相應(yīng)方面的應(yīng)對(duì)措施還不完善,因此,研究國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼具有十分重要的意義。本文全面分析了國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼的現(xiàn)狀和特點(diǎn),我國(guó)是目前世界上遭受反補(bǔ)貼最嚴(yán)重的國(guó)家,反補(bǔ)貼呈現(xiàn)出數(shù)量居高不下,發(fā)起國(guó)范圍和涉案產(chǎn)品種類都在不斷擴(kuò)大等特點(diǎn),并且有越來(lái)越多“雙反”案件出現(xiàn)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,深入分析了國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼的原因,主要進(jìn)口國(guó)貿(mào)易保護(hù)加強(qiáng),我國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼立法體系與《SCM協(xié)定》(《SCM協(xié)定》即WTO補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼措施協(xié)定)存在差異以及補(bǔ)貼政策與WTO規(guī)定之間存在沖突等方面的原因?qū)е路囱a(bǔ)貼案件頻頻發(fā)生。并進(jìn)一步研究了反補(bǔ)貼對(duì)我國(guó)外貿(mào)發(fā)展的影響,反補(bǔ)貼削弱我國(guó)出口產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,使出口產(chǎn)品同時(shí)遭受反傾銷、反補(bǔ)貼雙重歧視,同時(shí)限制政府對(duì)我國(guó)外貿(mào)調(diào)控手段的運(yùn)用,并運(yùn)用回歸分析法,以對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼數(shù)量最多的美國(guó)為研究對(duì)象,研究反補(bǔ)貼與我國(guó)外貿(mào)發(fā)展間存在的關(guān)系,得出反補(bǔ)貼阻礙我國(guó)外貿(mào)發(fā)展的結(jié)論。在深入分析了國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼現(xiàn)狀、原因和影響的基礎(chǔ)上,從政府、企業(yè)和行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)三方面提出了我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)反補(bǔ)貼的對(duì)策建議,為我國(guó)政府制定有效可行的應(yīng)對(duì)措施提供借鑒參考。政府應(yīng)不斷完善我國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼立法,按照WTO規(guī)定調(diào)整我國(guó)的補(bǔ)貼政策,建立與完善反補(bǔ)貼的預(yù)警機(jī)制和應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制;企業(yè)積極參與反補(bǔ)貼抗辯,并實(shí)現(xiàn)出口市場(chǎng)多元化;行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)充分發(fā)揮應(yīng)對(duì)反補(bǔ)貼中的溝通橋梁作用,做好協(xié)助政府和企業(yè)在反補(bǔ)貼信息方面的搜集整理工作。
[Abstract]:In the context of the prevalence of global trade protectionism, countervailing measures, as one of the three major trade relief measures under the framework of the World Trade Organization, have attracted more and more attention of the international community, especially since the outbreak of the world financial crisis in 2008. Anti-subsidy, the new weapon of trade protectionism, has been used more frequently. Since China's accession to the WTO, its foreign trade has stood the test and achieved sustained and rapid growth. At the same time, it has also encountered a large number of trade frictions. In recent years, In addition to anti-dumping and safeguard measures, countervailing measures, which were not applicable to "non-market economy" countries, have been continuously adopted by major exporting countries of our country. There have been more and more cases of "double countervailing" against China's export products. Foreign countries have repeatedly abused countervailing products to China's export products, which has brought serious adverse effects to the development of China's foreign trade, but the corresponding measures in our country have not been perfect, so, It is of great significance to study foreign countervailing to China. This paper comprehensively analyzes the present situation and characteristics of foreign countervailing to China. Our country is the country suffering the most serious countervailing in the world, and the quantity of countervailing is high. The scope of the sponsors and the types of products involved are constantly expanding, and there are more and more cases of "double countervailing". On this basis, the causes of foreign countervailing to China are deeply analyzed, and the trade protection of the major importing countries is strengthened. The differences between China's countervailing legislation system and SCM Agreement (that is, the Agreement on WTO subsidies and countervailing measures) and the conflict between the subsidy policy and the provisions of WTO lead to the frequent occurrence of countervailing cases. The influence of countervailing on the development of China's foreign trade is studied in one step. Countervailing weakens the competitiveness of China's export products, makes export products suffer from anti-dumping and countervailing double discrimination at the same time, at the same time limits the government's use of foreign trade regulation and control means, and applies regression analysis method. Taking the United States, which has the largest amount of countervailing to China, as the object of study, this paper studies the relationship between countervailing and the development of China's foreign trade, and draws the conclusion that countervailing hinders the development of China's foreign trade. On the basis of the causes and effects, the countermeasures and suggestions for countervailing in China are put forward from three aspects: government, enterprises and trade associations. The government should improve our countervailing legislation, adjust our subsidy policy in accordance with WTO regulations, and establish and perfect the early warning mechanism and response mechanism of countervailing. Enterprises actively participate in countervailing defense and realize the diversification of export market. Trade associations fully play the role of bridge in countervailing, and do a good job in assisting the government and enterprises to collect and collate countervailing information.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F741.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓松;;中國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼法律規(guī)則解析及完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年06期

2 徐晶;;我國(guó)出口商品遭遇反補(bǔ)貼指控的原因及對(duì)策[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年07期

3 楊榮珍;;國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼現(xiàn)狀及中國(guó)補(bǔ)貼政策分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2011年03期

4 王旭;;出口產(chǎn)品遭遇國(guó)外反補(bǔ)貼給中國(guó)造成的影響[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2012年10期

5 孔慶宇;;論我國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼法律制度[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年06期

6 李明;;中國(guó)遭受反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查的現(xiàn)狀及原因分析[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2014年07期

7 王晰;宗毅君;;歐盟反傾銷、反補(bǔ)貼運(yùn)作維護(hù)產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的效果實(shí)證研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年01期

8 胡麥秀;薛求知;;美國(guó)對(duì)華實(shí)施反補(bǔ)貼的經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治動(dòng)因分析[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

9 秦建元;;我國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼的現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策研究[J];學(xué)理論;2013年29期

10 胡江峰;WTO與我國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼立法[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年S1期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 潘舜;我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼措施問(wèn)題研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

2 王麗麗;國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼特點(diǎn)及我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

3 劉琳琳;美國(guó)對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼問(wèn)題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

4 張利潔;中印貿(mào)易摩擦對(duì)兩國(guó)貿(mào)易的影響及對(duì)策研究[D];河北大學(xué);2011年

5 李文梅;反補(bǔ)貼經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)及機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2008年

6 韓勇;我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)國(guó)外對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼的策略研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2008年

7 付新龍;國(guó)際對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼的成因及對(duì)策研究[D];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué);2008年

8 張海蘭;補(bǔ)貼反補(bǔ)貼及中國(guó)的對(duì)策研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

9 楊陽(yáng);補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼措施之專向性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

10 譚瀟寒;中國(guó)遭遇反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查動(dòng)因分析及對(duì)策研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1593736