發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-12 00:26

【摘要】：自2000年以來,我國的國際收支出現(xiàn)持續(xù)雙順差。我國是國際資本的凈流入國,使人民幣長(zhǎng)期處于升值壓力之中。為了維持匯率的相對(duì)穩(wěn)定或有序升值,央行需要在外匯市場(chǎng)買入外匯賣出本幣進(jìn)行干預(yù),加上我國實(shí)行了強(qiáng)制結(jié)售匯制度,導(dǎo)致我國外匯儲(chǔ)備規(guī)模急劇增加。貨幣當(dāng)局資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表中國外資產(chǎn)的規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大,造成基礎(chǔ)貨幣的膨脹,并通過貨幣乘數(shù)效應(yīng)導(dǎo)致國內(nèi)貨幣供給的擴(kuò)張,增加通貨膨脹的壓力并影響了貨幣政策的獨(dú)立性。因此,為了削弱外匯儲(chǔ)備增加帶來的貨幣供給擴(kuò)張效應(yīng),央行主要利用發(fā)行央票和調(diào)整準(zhǔn)備金率等工具來進(jìn)行沖銷操作。貨幣沖銷的有效性直接影響到了我國貨幣政策的獨(dú)立性,并且對(duì)物價(jià)穩(wěn)定和內(nèi)外均衡有著十分重要的意義。本文首先從理論分析角度,梳理了國際資本流動(dòng)對(duì)貨幣政策的影響,以及貨幣沖銷的必要性；然后描述了近年來不同形式資本流動(dòng)的特點(diǎn)和變化,并從穩(wěn)定性和波動(dòng)性角度分析其對(duì)外匯儲(chǔ)備的不同影響；還總結(jié)了我國的沖銷現(xiàn)狀,討論了我國沖銷工具的特點(diǎn)、成本和缺陷。在實(shí)證方面,本文采用修正的BGT模型和OLS方法,估計(jì)我國2000年至2012年期間國際資本流動(dòng)與貨幣供給的定量關(guān)系,用沖銷系數(shù)反映貨幣沖銷的有效程度,用抵消系數(shù)反映資本流動(dòng)對(duì)貨幣政策的抵消程度；并利用遞歸系數(shù)法估計(jì)了兩系數(shù)的動(dòng)態(tài)變化過程；同時(shí),對(duì)不同形式資本流動(dòng)的沖銷力度進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析和比較。最后,對(duì)如何減輕外匯沖銷壓力提出了若干建議。通過上述理論分析和實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),發(fā)現(xiàn)如下結(jié)論：1.總體而言,2000年至2012年間,我國的貨幣沖銷是有效的。沖銷系數(shù)為-0.944,表明央行的干預(yù)措施對(duì)沖了大部分國際資本流動(dòng)引發(fā)的貨幣供給變化。但資本流動(dòng)的抵消效應(yīng)也比較大,抵消系數(shù)為-0.833。因此認(rèn)為我國的貨幣政策獨(dú)立性受到影響。隨著未來資本項(xiàng)目管制的放松和利率市場(chǎng)化改革,抵消效應(yīng)可能會(huì)更大,將加大央行沖銷的難度。2.央行對(duì)不同形式的資本流動(dòng)的沖銷力度是不同的。穩(wěn)定性較高的資本流動(dòng)對(duì)外匯儲(chǔ)備的貢獻(xiàn)率較高,而央行對(duì)其的沖銷力度低于對(duì)波動(dòng)性較大的資本流動(dòng)的沖銷力度�？赡艿脑蛴校阂�、穩(wěn)定性較高的資本流動(dòng)的規(guī)模要大于波動(dòng)性較大的資本流動(dòng),其增加幅度超過了央行能夠沖銷的范圍；二、波動(dòng)性較大的資本流動(dòng)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的沖擊大,央行有意識(shí)地在其大規(guī)模流入時(shí)加大沖銷干預(yù)。另外,把資本流動(dòng)按外匯來源分類,發(fā)現(xiàn)央行對(duì)外國直接投資的沖銷力度最大,認(rèn)為與其規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大和占外匯來源的比重提高相關(guān)；從動(dòng)態(tài)變化上看,2006年后央行才開始對(duì)外國直接投資進(jìn)行沖銷,在2009年和2010年連續(xù)加大了對(duì)非直接投資的沖銷,可能與這兩個(gè)時(shí)期的高通脹壓力有關(guān)。3.我國采用發(fā)行央票和調(diào)節(jié)存款準(zhǔn)備金率的沖銷工具,獲得了一定成效。但是隨著沖銷規(guī)模的擴(kuò)大和沖銷成本的上升,以及工具本身存在的缺陷,限制了我國貨幣沖銷的能力。4.2012年的資本流出緩解了央行的沖銷壓力并減少了央行的沖銷直接成本,但是隨著2013年資本的大規(guī)模流入,外匯儲(chǔ)備的增長(zhǎng)與穩(wěn)健貨幣政策、去杠桿化政策之間的沖突會(huì)逐漸加重,央行未來又將承受巨大的沖銷壓力。從短期來看,應(yīng)提高沖銷干預(yù)的有效性,進(jìn)一步改善沖銷工具、匯率制度和外匯管理制度；從長(zhǎng)期來說,我國必須進(jìn)一步改善國際收支的巨額順差,包括調(diào)整經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)和外貿(mào)政策等。
[Abstract]:China's balance of payments has continued to have a double surplus since 2000. China is the net inflow country of international capital, so that the RMB is in the pressure of appreciation for a long time. In order to maintain the relative stability or the orderly appreciation of the exchange rate, the central bank needs to intervene in the foreign exchange market to buy foreign exchange and sell the local currency, plus the forced settlement of the foreign exchange system in our country, which has led to a sharp increase in the scale of foreign exchange reserves in our country. The expansion of the external assets of the balance sheet of the monetary authorities has led to the expansion of the base currency and the expansion of domestic currency supply through the monetary multiplier effect, increasing the pressure of inflation and affecting the independence of the monetary policy. Therefore, in order to weaken the currency supply expansion effect brought by the increase of the foreign exchange reserve, the central bank mainly uses tools such as the issuance of the central ticket and the adjustment of the reserve ratio to reverse the operation. The effectiveness of the reversal of money has a direct effect on the independence of the monetary policy of our country, and it is of great significance to the price stability and the internal and external balance. This paper first analyzes the influence of international capital flow on monetary policy and the necessity of currency reversal from the angle of theoretical analysis, and then describes the characteristics and changes of different forms of capital flow in recent years, and analyzes the different effects on foreign exchange reserves from the angle of stability and volatility. The paper also summarizes the reverse current situation of our country, and discusses the characteristics, cost and defects of the reverse tool in our country. In this paper, we use the modified BGT model and OLS method to estimate the quantitative relation between the international capital flow and the money supply for the period from 2000 to 2012. The dynamic process of two coefficients is estimated by the recursive coefficient method, and the reverse force of different forms of capital flows is analyzed and compared. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to how to reduce the foreign exchange reverse pressure. Through the above-mentioned theoretical analysis and empirical test, the following conclusions are found:1. In general, in the period 2000-2012, our country's currency reversal is effective. The write-off factor is-0.944, indicating that the central bank's intervention has hedges most of the changes in money supply triggered by the flow of international capital. However, the offset effect of capital flow is also large, and the offset coefficient is-0.833. Therefore, our country's monetary policy independence is affected. With the deregulation of the future capital project and the market-oriented reform of interest rate, the offset effect may be larger and the difficulty of the central bank's reversal will be increased. The central bank's reversal of different forms of capital flows is different. The higher stability of capital flows has a higher contribution to foreign exchange reserves, and the central bank's reverse is less than the reversal of the volatility of capital flows. The possible causes are:1. The higher-stability capital flows are larger than the volatility of the capital flows, the increase of which exceeds the range that the central bank can write off; and the relatively volatile capital flows have a great impact on the economy, The central bank has consciously stepped up the write-off intervention in its large-scale inflow. In addition, the capital flow is classified according to the source of foreign exchange, and it is found that the central bank's reversal of foreign direct investment is the largest, which is considered to be related to the expansion of its size and the specific gravity of the source of foreign exchange; from the dynamic change, the central bank has started to reverse the foreign direct investment in 2006, The continuous increase in the reversal of non-direct investment in 2009 and 2010 may be related to the high inflation pressures of these two periods. Our country adopts the reverse tool of issuing the central ticket and adjusting the reserve ratio of the deposit reserve, and has obtained some effect. But with the expansion of the write-off scale and the rise in the write-off cost, as well as the shortcomings in the tool itself, the ability to reverse our currency is limited. With the growth of foreign exchange reserves and the prudent monetary policy, the conflict between deleveraging and deleveraging will gradually increase, and the central bank will bear huge write-off pressure in the future. In the short term, the effectiveness of the write-off intervention should be improved, the reverse tool, the exchange rate system and the foreign exchange management system should be further improved; in the long term, our country must further improve the large surplus of the balance of payments, including the adjustment of the economic structure and the foreign trade policy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F832.6

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張煌;利率市場(chǎng)化對(duì)銀行業(yè)的經(jīng)營風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析及對(duì)策建議[J];海南金融;2005年03期

2 向文華;資本賬戶自由化進(jìn)程中的適應(yīng)性資本管制[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

3 王立平,李連三;利率市場(chǎng)化分析[J];吉林財(cái)稅高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 張紅地;;中國公開市場(chǎng)業(yè)務(wù)的操作目標(biāo):一個(gè)描述性分析[J];廣東金融學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

5 牛曉健;中國轉(zhuǎn)軌時(shí)期經(jīng)常項(xiàng)目下的資本流動(dòng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2005年05期

6 胡乃武,王春芳;資本項(xiàng)目放開條件下的貨幣政策調(diào)控[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2002年04期

7 袁仕陳;范明;;不同形式國際資本流動(dòng)對(duì)中國貨幣政策的抵消效應(yīng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2012年06期

8 張曉群;我國貨幣流通速度的利率敏感性分析[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年12期

9 王元龍;人民幣匯率:制度選擇與改革操作[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2003年07期

10 李穎;楊繼剛;;后金融危機(jī)時(shí)代的中國貨幣政策轉(zhuǎn)型[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角;2010年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 顧巧明;基于市場(chǎng)一體化的我國貨幣政策傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2011年

2 竇晴身;貨幣政策傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制研究[D];中共中央黨校;2001年

3 趙榮祥;信用制度下的票據(jù)市場(chǎng)研究[D];中共中央黨校;2002年

4 陶曉龍;匯率決定與波動(dòng)理論[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年

5 余維彬;匯率穩(wěn)定政策研究[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年

6 林東海;論匯率制度：歷史發(fā)展、理論分析與實(shí)證研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2002年

7 方顯倉;我國貨幣政策信用渠道傳導(dǎo)的微觀機(jī)制及其效應(yīng)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2003年

8 方衛(wèi)星;貨幣政策的目標(biāo)設(shè)定制度——機(jī)理與效應(yīng)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2003年

9 張丕強(qiáng);銀行監(jiān)管組織結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

10 盧慶杰;貨幣政策傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制比較研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫艷楠;基于貿(mào)易渠道的我國國際短期資本流入研究[D];沈陽理工大學(xué);2010年

2 陳超;我國貨幣政策非對(duì)稱效應(yīng)的實(shí)證研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2011年

3 趙東亮;中國的外匯儲(chǔ)備與貨幣供應(yīng)量增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

4 莫君藝;國際收支雙順差與流動(dòng)性過剩關(guān)系研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

5 郎雯;中國貨幣政策的區(qū)域效應(yīng)檢驗(yàn)及分析[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

6 張志明;我國外匯儲(chǔ)備對(duì)貨幣政策有效性的影響[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

7 周曉明;論中國的貨幣替代問題[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院;2000年

8 劉斐;中國貨幣市場(chǎng)與資本市場(chǎng)關(guān)聯(lián)性分析[D];河南大學(xué);2001年

9 周曄;資本市場(chǎng)與貨幣政策研究[D];河南大學(xué);2001年

10 李海燕;論國際投機(jī)資本及中國的對(duì)策[D];暨南大學(xué);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：2497575