【摘要】：由于金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易關(guān)系到一國的金融運行和經(jīng)濟安全,金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易受到越來越多學(xué)者的關(guān)注,同時,隨著入世過渡期的結(jié)束,我國的金融服務(wù)市場也隨之對外全面開放。在此背景下,本文以中國的金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易市場開放和金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易出口作為研究對象,分析中國金融服務(wù)市場的開放,探討開放影響中國金融服務(wù)出口貿(mào)易的狀況,能夠?qū)U大金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易的出口的有所幫助,也可以在一定的程度上,幫助提升我國的國際競爭力。 本文具體地研究了我國金融貿(mào)易現(xiàn)在的狀況和競爭力現(xiàn)在的情況,對我國金融服務(wù)市場開放的歷程進行了比較詳細(xì)的整理,由此能夠讓我們更加清楚的得出：中國的金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易存在著逆差、出口結(jié)構(gòu)不均衡以及競爭力極弱等現(xiàn)狀；中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易市場的開放,亦遵循整個國家改革開放的“摸著石頭過河”的漸進政策,先謹(jǐn)慎開放試點城市和部分業(yè)務(wù),直至最后全面開放。本文運用修正的Mattoo的計算一個國家金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易市場開放水平的方法,計算了我國的金融服務(wù)市場開放的水平,發(fā)現(xiàn)中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易國民待遇的開放水平要遠(yuǎn)高于市場準(zhǔn)入的開放水平,說明目前中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易的限制還主要集中于市場準(zhǔn)入的限制,且各個行業(yè)開放的力度存在差異,銀行業(yè)和保險業(yè)已經(jīng)基本上實現(xiàn)了對外全面開放,而證券業(yè)開放還處于較低開放水平的階段。在以上關(guān)于金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易和金融服務(wù)市場開放的分析后,本文通過實證分析,研究了1997年至2012年中國金融服務(wù)市場對外開放對中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易出口的影響,通過計量回歸結(jié)果來看,中國的金融服務(wù)市場開放對中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易出口存在著負(fù)向的影響關(guān)系,同時,實證分析的結(jié)果顯示人力、技術(shù)和資本這三個要素,對于中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易出口有顯著的正相關(guān)的影響關(guān)系。最后,本文試圖提出一些促進中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易出口,同時也對接下來的開放提出了策略。
[Abstract]:As the trade of financial services is related to the financial operation and economic security of a country, more and more scholars pay attention to the trade of financial services. At the same time, with the end of the transitional period of China's entry into WTO, the financial service market of our country has also been opened to the outside world in an all-round way. In this context, this paper takes the opening of China's financial services trade market and the export of financial services trade as the research object, analyzes the opening of China's financial services market, and probes into the situation that the opening up of China's financial services export trade affects China's financial services export trade. It can help to expand the export of financial services trade, and to a certain extent, help to enhance our international competitiveness. This paper concretely studies the current situation of financial trade and competitiveness of our country, and makes a detailed arrangement of the course of opening up the financial service market in China. From this, we can get more clearly: China's financial services trade deficit, export structure imbalance and competitiveness is very weak and so on; The opening of China's financial services trade market also follows the gradual policy of "crossing the river" in the reform and opening up of the whole country, opening up the pilot cities and some business carefully until the end of the opening up. In this paper, we use the modified Mattoo method to calculate the open level of a country's financial services trade market, and calculate the open level of our country's financial services market. It is found that the opening level of the national treatment of China's financial services trade is much higher than the opening level of market access, indicating that at present the restrictions on China's financial services trade are mainly focused on the restrictions of market access, and there are differences in the intensity of opening up in various industries. The banking and insurance industries have basically been fully opened to the outside world, while the securities industry is still at a low level of opening. After the above analysis on the trade in financial services and the opening up of the financial services market, this paper studies the impact of the opening up of China's financial services market on the export of China's financial services trade from 1997 to 2012 through empirical analysis. The results of econometric regression show that the opening of China's financial services market has a negative impact on the export of China's financial services trade. At the same time, the results of empirical analysis show that human resources, technology and capital are three factors. There is a significant positive correlation for the export of China's financial services trade. Finally, this paper tries to propose some strategies to promote the export of China's financial services trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F752.68;F832;F752.62

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋耀,張偉;中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易開放度評價[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年06期

2 張金清;管華雨;劉慶富;;中國金融市場準(zhǔn)入和國民待遇承諾水平的測度研究[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2008年03期

3 姚戰(zhàn)琪;;金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易自由化的理論及發(fā)展趨勢[J];國際貿(mào)易;2006年06期

4 鐘惠蕓;黃建忠;;金融服務(wù)的產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易及其影響因素分析[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2011年02期

5 張巖;;影響中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易國際競爭力的因素分析[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2012年03期

6 陳勇;謝建敢;;金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易開放、銀行業(yè)效率與經(jīng)濟增長[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

7 黃滿盈;鄧曉虹;;中國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易國際競爭力的影響因素:基于“鉆石模型”的實證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟研究;2011年07期

8 賈秋然;;金融開放測度方法與指標(biāo)體系述評[J];經(jīng)濟評論;2011年03期

9 郭根龍,馮宗憲;金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易市場開放次序的經(jīng)驗及一般邏輯[J];經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2004年03期

10 唐寧斌;;開放條件下我國金融服務(wù)貿(mào)易競爭力實證分析[J];金融經(jīng)濟;2007年04期

，

本文編號：2369214