發(fā)布時間：2018-05-31 19:51

  本文選題：融資約束 + 支付方式�。� 參考：《重慶工商大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,企業(yè)的并購活動越來越活躍,并購在現代企業(yè)占有重要的戰(zhàn)略地位,已經成為現代企業(yè)尋求發(fā)展、對外擴張以及提升企業(yè)價值的重要途徑,而支付方式作為企業(yè)并購的最后一個環(huán)節(jié)往往能夠成為并購能否成功的關鍵,并購績效能夠檢驗并購企業(yè)雙方通過并購方式進行資源整合后能否實現企業(yè)價值的增長。我國目前正處于經濟轉型時期,資本市場并不是十分完善,融資約束成為企業(yè)并購過程中的關鍵性難題。本文結合規(guī)模經濟效應理論、交易費用理論、風險分散理論和協(xié)同效應理論、代理理論、信息不對稱、優(yōu)序融資理論等,結合國內外學者對于融資約束和支付方式對于企業(yè)并購績效的影響的研究,分析了2009年至2013年滬、深兩市發(fā)生并購的391起上市公司的數據。選取公司規(guī)模、交易規(guī)模、資產負債率、行業(yè)相關性、托賓Q等控制變量,構建融資約束、支付方式與并購績效的模型,對相關的并購事件進行實證分析,得到如下結論:第一、理論上,如本文文獻綜述所示,學者們大都從單個因素出發(fā),研究某一方面因素對并購績效的影響,但并未對影響并購績效的因素達成一致結論。本文在總結前人研究的基礎上,從融資約束、支付方式和并購績效這一全新視角出發(fā),對融資約束和并購績效以及支付方式和并購績效之間的關系進行實證分析。第二、經實證檢驗融資約束正向影響支付方式,且相關性顯著。第三、支付方式正向影響并購績效,并呈相關性顯著性。在并購后第一年和并購后第三年,支付方式對并購績效的正向影響更為顯著。本文的價值在于:一是為并購績效研究提出了一個新的研究方向,并對這個方向進行了初探。二是國內外的學者均只考察不同支付方式對主并公司的績效產生的直接影響,而忽略間接影響。本文在前人研究的基礎上,另外還用融資約束指標對主并公司進行分組,考察融資約束對并購績效更深層次的影響,使研究的結果更為細化。本文的研究有助于豐富企業(yè)并購理論,提高對企業(yè)并購決策的理論指導水平。
[Abstract]:In recent years, M & A activities have become more and more active. M & A occupies an important strategic position in modern enterprises. It has become an important way for modern enterprises to seek development, expand abroad and enhance the value of enterprises. As the last link of M & A, payment method can often be the key to the success of M & A, and the performance of M & A can test whether the resource integration of both parties can achieve the growth of enterprise value. At present, our country is in the economic transition period, the capital market is not very perfect, the financing restriction becomes the key problem in the process of enterprise merger and acquisition. This paper combines economies of scale effect theory, transaction cost theory, risk dispersion theory and synergetic effect theory, agency theory, information asymmetry, order financing theory, etc. Based on the research on the effect of financing constraints and payment methods on corporate M & A performance, the data of 391 listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2013 are analyzed. Selecting the control variables such as company size, transaction scale, asset-liability ratio, industry correlation, Tobin Q and so on, to construct the model of financing constraints, payment methods and M & A performance, and to make an empirical analysis on the related M & A events. The main conclusions are as follows: first, in theory, as the literature review shows, scholars mostly study the impact of one factor on M & A performance from a single factor, but do not reach a consensus conclusion on the factors affecting M & A performance. On the basis of summarizing the previous studies, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the relationship between financing constraints and M & A performance and the relationship between payment methods and M & A performance from the perspective of financing constraint, payment mode and M & A performance. Secondly, the positive effect of financing constraint on payment is significant. Third, the way of payment positively affects M & A performance, and has significant correlation. In the first year after the merger and the third year after the merger, the way of payment has a more positive impact on the performance of the merger. The value of this paper lies in: first, it puts forward a new research direction for M & A performance research, and probes into this direction. Second, scholars at home and abroad only examine the direct impact of different payment methods on the performance of the merger company, but ignore the indirect impact. On the basis of previous studies, this paper also uses the financing constraint index to group the main and concurrent companies to investigate the deeper impact of the financing constraints on the M & A performance, so that the results of the study are more detailed. The research in this paper is helpful to enrich the theory of M & A and improve the theoretical guidance level of M & A decision.
【學位授予單位】：重慶工商大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F271;F275

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 連玉君;程建;;投資—現金流敏感性:融資約束還是代理成本?[J];財經研究;2007年02期

2 葛永波;周倬君;柳艷;;融資約束導致投資不足還是代理問題導致投資過度?——基于上市公司的經驗證據[J];東岳論叢;2012年03期

3 吳世農;我國證券市場效率的分析[J];經濟研究;1996年04期

4 鄭江淮,何旭強,王華;上市公司投資的融資約束:從股權結構角度的實證分析[J];金融研究;2001年11期

，

本文編號：1961078