本文選題：公共管理 + 國有銀行　； 參考：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗證明,如果沒有國家對經(jīng)濟(jì)的適度干預(yù),市場經(jīng)濟(jì)不能得到良性運(yùn)行。在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)行中,政府部門作為傳統(tǒng)公共管理理論中的公共管理主體,通過實(shí)施相關(guān)政策,來維護(hù)社會正義,促進(jìn)社會發(fā)展。新公共管理理論認(rèn)為,公共事務(wù)的治理主體絕非只有政府一家,其他非政府公共組織、社會團(tuán)體、企業(yè)、社區(qū)甚至公民個人也可以在一定的制度安排下成為公共事務(wù)的治理主體,從而真正體現(xiàn)公共管理之公共屬性。在新公共管理理論框架下,國有銀行作為國有企業(yè),作為政府參與和干預(yù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的一種工具和手段,是政府針對市場失靈問題而代表社會公眾利益所采取的間接干預(yù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的政策,是市場經(jīng)濟(jì)中普遍通行的國家參與經(jīng)濟(jì)、調(diào)控市場的一種方式方法。國有銀行性質(zhì)決定了其參與公共事務(wù)管理、履行社會責(zé)任的社會公共管理屬性(非經(jīng)濟(jì)屬性),是其自身的重要職責(zé)。作為整個市場經(jīng)濟(jì)一員的國有銀行,不但要承擔(dān)傳統(tǒng)上的與其自身營利相關(guān)的責(zé)任,還要承擔(dān)在信息披露、慈善公益、勞工、產(chǎn)品、環(huán)境保護(hù)等方面的社會責(zé)任,作為社會公共事務(wù)管理的主體部分,共同承擔(dān)公共管理的社會職能。近年來金融危機(jī)等社會事件頻發(fā),社會各界對國有銀行履行社會責(zé)任尤為關(guān)注。政府部門把要求企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會責(zé)任提升到戰(zhàn)略高度,并從法律上予以明確。國有銀行作為我國金融行業(yè)的骨干企業(yè),掌握著國民經(jīng)濟(jì)命脈,對社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展起著至關(guān)重要的作用,理應(yīng)積極貫徹國家宏觀調(diào)控政策,自覺帶頭履行企業(yè)社會責(zé)任,高效配置金融資源,推進(jìn)企業(yè)社會責(zé)任發(fā)展。2006年以來,各家國有銀行陸續(xù)以書面形式向社會公布當(dāng)年履行社會責(zé)任情況,截至目前,國有銀行已全部發(fā)布社會責(zé)任報告或相關(guān)公告。本文以國有A銀行實(shí)踐社會責(zé)任的情況為例,通過橫向?qū)Ω骷覈秀y行社會責(zé)任現(xiàn)狀的數(shù)據(jù)分析,從公共管理角度出發(fā),重新審視國有銀行作為國有企業(yè)的非經(jīng)濟(jì)屬性,即公共性,國有銀行作為公共管理主體,在社會公共事務(wù)中應(yīng)承擔(dān)的管理職責(zé)。同時,深入分析現(xiàn)階段國有銀行社會責(zé)任存在的問題及原因,提出改進(jìn)建議,以期改善在宏觀層面的國有銀行社會責(zé)任,引導(dǎo)國有銀行完善內(nèi)部社會責(zé)任制度建設(shè),克服市場化進(jìn)程中不斷滋長的逐利沖動對國有銀行的發(fā)展和社會經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)步帶來的負(fù)面影響,維護(hù)社會公眾利益,促進(jìn)社會和諧穩(wěn)定。全文共分六個部分：第一部分,論述了本文的研究背景、研究意義、研究方法,回顧了國內(nèi)外對企業(yè)社會責(zé)任的理論研究歷程。界定公共管理主體外延,從國有銀行的國有企業(yè)性質(zhì)出發(fā),分析國有銀行公共屬性,以及其作為公共管理事務(wù)的主體,共同參與社會公共事務(wù)的意義,進(jìn)而提出本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)及不足之處。第二部分,通過國有銀行自身的公共屬性和履行社會責(zé)任的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義進(jìn)行分析,充分闡述國有銀行履行社會責(zé)任的必要性。第三部分,通過企業(yè)社會責(zé)任理論,對國有銀行社會責(zé)任內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行闡述,詳細(xì)描述了國有銀行在信息披露、公益、產(chǎn)品、環(huán)境、勞工、經(jīng)濟(jì)六個方面的社會責(zé)任。第四部分,以國有A銀行為例,分析現(xiàn)階段國有銀行履行社會責(zé)任的現(xiàn)狀。國有銀行履行社會責(zé)任過程中,在信息披露、貫徹宏觀調(diào)控政策、社會公益事業(yè)、經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任等方面表現(xiàn)較好,而在對社會責(zé)任把握、外部監(jiān)管機(jī)制、內(nèi)部績效考核管理、“三農(nóng)”信貸支持、社區(qū)服務(wù)、金融產(chǎn)品、勞工責(zé)任、環(huán)保責(zé)任等方面存在一定的問題。第五部分,分析國有銀行履行社會責(zé)任問題的成因,在經(jīng)濟(jì)改革市場化過程中,國有銀行對社會責(zé)任認(rèn)識不清,而作為企業(yè),又過度重視經(jīng)濟(jì)利益流入,忽視了其他責(zé)任,包括農(nóng)村信貸、環(huán)保等,僅僅把履行社會責(zé)任、公布社會責(zé)任報告當(dāng)做宣傳手段,社會責(zé)任的內(nèi)部管理和外部評價體系不健全,不能對企業(yè)社會責(zé)任履行情況進(jìn)行衡量,就業(yè)形勢嚴(yán)峻導(dǎo)致的對員工權(quán)益的忽視,對發(fā)展和社會經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)步造成一定的負(fù)面影響。第六部分,針對國有銀行社會責(zé)任不足之處提出對策建議。在企業(yè)社會責(zé)任意識、行業(yè)統(tǒng)一規(guī)范、多元化監(jiān)管機(jī)制、社會責(zé)任報告制度、員工合法權(quán)益、低碳環(huán)保、國際交流合作等方面提出對策建議,引導(dǎo)國有銀行規(guī)范社會責(zé)任,維護(hù)社會和諧穩(wěn)定。
[Abstract]:The experience of the development of the market economy proves that, without the moderate intervention of the state to the economy, the market economy can not get a good operation. In the operation of the market economy, the government departments, as the main body of the public management in the traditional public management theory, maintain the social justice and promote the social development by implementing the relevant policies. The governance subject of public affairs is not only one government, other non-governmental public organizations, social groups, enterprises, communities and even citizens can also be the main governance subject of public affairs under certain institutional arrangements, thus truly embodying public management of public property. Under the framework of new public management theory, state-owned banks are the state owned enterprises. As a tool and means for the government to participate in and intervene in the economy, the enterprise is a policy of indirect intervention by the government to represent the public interest in the light of the market failure. It is a way of participating in the economy in the market economy and regulating the market. The nature of the state bank determines its participation in public affairs. As a member of the whole market economy, the state-owned bank, as a member of the whole market economy, should not only bear the responsibility of its own profit related, but also bear the social responsibility of information disclosure, charity, labor, product, environmental protection and so on. As the main part of the management of social public affairs, the social functions of the public management are jointly undertaken. In recent years, the financial crisis and other social events are frequent. All walks of life are particularly concerned with the implementation of social responsibility of the state-owned banks. The government departments have promoted the social responsibility of the enterprises to the strategic high, and made clear from the law. For the backbone enterprises of our financial industry, master the lifeblood of the national economy and play a vital role in the social and economic development. We should actively carry out the national macroeconomic regulation and control policies, consciously take the lead in fulfilling corporate social responsibility, efficiently allocate financial resources, and promote the development of corporate social responsibility in.2006 years. At present, the state bank has published all the social responsibility reports or related announcements. This paper, taking the situation of the social responsibility of the state-owned A bank as an example, analyzes the status of social responsibility of the state-owned banks horizontally, and reexamines the state-owned silver from the perspective of public management. As the non economic attribute of the state-owned enterprise, namely, the public nature, the state-owned bank as the main body of the public management, the management responsibility should be undertaken in the social public affairs. At the same time, it analyzes the existing problems and causes of the social responsibility of the state-owned banks, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the social responsibility of the state-owned banks at the macro level and guide the country. There are six parts: the first part, the paper is divided into six parts: the first part, the research background and significance of this paper are discussed. Research methods, review the theoretical research process of corporate social responsibility at home and abroad, define the extension of public management subject, analyze the public property of state-owned banks from the nature of state owned enterprises of state-owned banks, as well as their role as the main body of public management affairs, and share the significance of social public and common affairs. The second part, through the analysis of the public property and the practical significance of the social responsibility of the state-owned banks, the necessity of the state bank to fulfill the social responsibility is fully expounded. The third part, through the theory of corporate social responsibility, expounds the connotation of the social responsibility of the state-owned banks, and describes the information disclosure of the state-owned banks in detail, The social responsibility of public welfare, product, environment, labor and economy in six aspects. The fourth part, taking the state-owned A bank as an example, analyzes the present state of the state bank to fulfill the social responsibility. In the process of carrying out the social responsibility of the state bank, it is better in the information disclosure, the implementation of the macro regulation policy, the social public welfare undertakings, the economic responsibility and so on. There are some problems in the aspects of responsibility assurance, external regulatory mechanism, internal performance assessment management, "three rural" credit support, community service, financial products, labor responsibility, environmental responsibility and other aspects. The fifth part analyzes the causes of the social responsibility of the state-owned banks. In the process of market-oriented economic reform, the state bank is aware of the social responsibility. It is not clear, but as an enterprise, it attaches great importance to the inflow of economic interests and neglects other responsibilities, including rural credit, environmental protection, and so on. It only regards social responsibility and social responsibility report as propaganda means, the internal management and external evaluation system of social responsibility are not sound, and can not measure the performance of corporate social responsibility, and form employment form. The neglect of employees' rights and interests caused by the severe potential has a certain negative impact on the development and social and economic progress. In the sixth part, it puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions for the lack of social responsibility of the state-owned banks. In the enterprise social responsibility consciousness, the industry unified standard, the diversified supervision mechanism, the social responsibility reporting system, the legal rights and interests of the employees, the low carbon ring In order to protect social harmony and stability, we should put forward countermeasures and suggestions in order to guide state-owned banks to standardize their social responsibilities and to maintain social harmony and stability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.33

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡家保;銀行“兩權(quán)分離”的思考[J];銀行與企業(yè);1988年08期

2 姜維俊;;把企業(yè)推向市場,銀行怎么辦?[J];銀行與企業(yè);1992年09期

3 賈懷京,侯定丕,顧基發(fā);管理者派遣與企業(yè)所有權(quán)狀態(tài)隨機(jī)依存——日本六大企業(yè)集團(tuán)的主銀行1997年向企業(yè)派遣管理者的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年04期

4 劉德傳;糧食壓庫嚴(yán)重 銀行企業(yè)處于兩難[J];中國物價;2000年07期

5 ;網(wǎng)上銀行解決方案[J];華南金融電腦;2000年11期

6 ;上海銀行與海關(guān)合作雙方簽署“海關(guān)稅費(fèi)電子轉(zhuǎn)帳聯(lián)網(wǎng)合作協(xié)議書”[J];現(xiàn)代金融;2000年07期

7 王濤,李志明,閆傳法;放眼網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2001年13期

8 丁竹君;我國中小銀行的先天不足與融資取向辨析[J];甘肅金融;2002年01期

9 劉從軍,任鳳茹;日本銀行重建及其對我國的啟示[J];日本問題研究;2003年04期

10 倪寶;新一輪銀行兼并更理性[J];數(shù)字財富;2003年09期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 趙宏燕;路應(yīng)金;唐小我;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行風(fēng)險分析方法[A];2003年中國管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文集[C];2003年

2 安徽分行中青年研究會"藍(lán)海戰(zhàn)略"課題組;王勝軍;方滿芬;趙華西;陳尚武;;從四個縣支行發(fā)展實(shí)踐看藍(lán)海戰(zhàn)略[A];2008年中國農(nóng)村金融學(xué)會中青年研討會論文集[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 廖保平;銀行分類監(jiān)管 難以對癥下藥[N];經(jīng)理日報;2005年

2 羅忠福 劉冰;銀行文化建設(shè)的思考[N];金融時報;2003年

3 遲智廣;銀行廣告走過來[N];證券時報;2001年

4 胡光華;銀行發(fā)力小企業(yè)信貸謀求雙贏[N];福建工商時報;2006年

5 周麗華;銀行股：市場的中堅力量[N];金融時報;2006年

6 郝勤學(xué)邋實(shí)習(xí)生 王曉馨;我市召開政府銀行企業(yè)座談會[N];天水日報;2008年

7 記者 夏心愉;銀行與企業(yè) 誰“綁架”了貸款？[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2012年

8 吳秋余;銀行股大漲怎么看[N];人民日報;2013年

9 記者 申海洋;不求銀行企業(yè)也能融資[N];民營經(jīng)濟(jì)報;2013年

10 李富永;暴利銀行也有疲軟一面[N];中華工商時報;2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 周婧;銀行反洗錢內(nèi)部控制效率評價體系研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

2 吳曉;入世后我國中小商業(yè)銀行地域及業(yè)務(wù)拓展研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 辛q，

本文編號：1903134