發(fā)布時間：2018-03-27 06:04

  本文選題：ODI區(qū)位選擇　切入點：母國特定優(yōu)勢　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：自1978年始,中國ODI經(jīng)歷了二十余年的蟄伏,直到2002年以后才以爆發(fā)式增長引起世界注意,也就在過去短短十余年時間,IB領(lǐng)域涌現(xiàn)出大量中國ODI研究文獻,圍繞中國ODI投資特殊性展開激烈討論,橫亙在這一輪討論背后的深層次思考為,中國ODI特殊表象是否需要突破既有FDI理論,抑或只需對既有理論進行中國維度的拓展?即經(jīng)典的"Chinese theory of business V.S. Theory of Chinese business"爭論(Alon and Child,2011)。雖然就此問題的結(jié)論,學(xué)者莫衷一是,但既有研究都一致聚焦到母國視角,紛紛將中國ODI分析鑲嵌在中國國內(nèi)宏觀經(jīng)濟發(fā)展背景之下,并幾近達成共識：目前中國經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型是中國ODI特殊性的主要成因。 延續(xù)這一研究思路,并彌補既有國際商務(wù)理論對中國ODI區(qū)位選擇行為研究缺乏系統(tǒng)框架的缺陷,本文采用制度兼容與技術(shù)適宜優(yōu)勢理論搭建母國宏觀因素作用微觀企業(yè)投資區(qū)位選擇行為的橋梁機制。本文將新興FDI理論和傳統(tǒng)FDI理論關(guān)于企業(yè)所有權(quán)優(yōu)勢與企業(yè)投資動機的討論置于一個框架中進行分析,借用新新貿(mào)易理論的企業(yè)異質(zhì)性思想,修正HMCFMECM模型從而構(gòu)建企業(yè)ODI區(qū)位選擇一般化模型；在此基礎(chǔ)上,從制度兼容和技術(shù)適宜兩個方面抽取出企業(yè)所有權(quán)優(yōu)勢中的母國來源,并將此概括為“母國特定優(yōu)勢”,繼而母國特定優(yōu)勢包括制度嵌入優(yōu)勢和技術(shù)適宜優(yōu)勢。至此,本文得到“ODI企業(yè)區(qū)位選擇模型--母國宏觀因素基于模型的切入點--母國特定優(yōu)勢影響企業(yè)ODI區(qū)位選擇”這一完整的邏輯鏈條,這也是本文研究的核心內(nèi)容：母國特定優(yōu)勢下企業(yè)ODI區(qū)位選擇機制。此外,本文利用母國特定優(yōu)勢下企業(yè)ODI區(qū)位選擇機制框架,揭示中國ODI在母國轉(zhuǎn)型背景下,如何充當(dāng)政府促進邊際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與區(qū)位限定(location bound)資源獲取工具,從而受政府作用調(diào)整,表現(xiàn)出區(qū)位選擇偏好。 本文主要得到以下三方面結(jié)論：第一,母國特定優(yōu)勢促進傳統(tǒng)型ODI投資流向制度和技術(shù)環(huán)境與母國相近的東道國。第二,母國特定優(yōu)勢促進戰(zhàn)略型ODI投資流向制度和技術(shù)環(huán)境與母國差距適度的東道國。第三,在經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型宏觀背景下,政府強化中國ODI母國特定優(yōu)勢,令2003-2010年中國ODI穩(wěn)定集中在三類、共計50個國家,分別為：自然資源豐裕但風(fēng)險較高國家、廉價勞動力豐裕發(fā)展中國家、戰(zhàn)略資產(chǎn)豐裕但與中國有過密切FDI往來的發(fā)達國家。 本文回應(yīng)了關(guān)于中國ODI區(qū)位是否具有特殊性的爭論,認為,中國ODI企業(yè)投資并未脫離利潤最大化的理性經(jīng)濟人假設(shè),且當(dāng)前中國ODI行為也未脫離企業(yè)所有權(quán)優(yōu)勢基礎(chǔ),而企業(yè)所有權(quán)優(yōu)勢恰恰是IB領(lǐng)域分析企業(yè)ODI的出發(fā)點。故本文針對中國ODI區(qū)位選擇特殊性爭論的觀點呼之欲出：中國ODI區(qū)位選擇在理論層面上并未脫離既有IB領(lǐng)域的一般分析框架,其之所以表現(xiàn)出不用于先行國家企業(yè)ODI的“一般性規(guī)律”,關(guān)鍵原因在于當(dāng)前中國ODI企業(yè)開展海外投資憑借的企業(yè)所有權(quán)優(yōu)勢,非發(fā)達國家ODI企業(yè)普遍具備的技術(shù)優(yōu)勢,而是較大比重來自母國特定優(yōu)勢。中國經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型的特殊經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)實導(dǎo)致母國特定優(yōu)勢具備一定特殊性,這就是為何目前中國ODI表現(xiàn)出穩(wěn)定的三類區(qū)位選擇偏好。 本文創(chuàng)新點主要體現(xiàn)為兩個層面：從理論層面看,區(qū)別傳統(tǒng)型與戰(zhàn)略型ODI投資差異的同時,更將兩類企業(yè)ODI投資行為統(tǒng)一到同一區(qū)位選擇模型之中,為其后研究企業(yè)區(qū)位選擇提供系統(tǒng)的模型框架。彌補既有IB領(lǐng)域缺乏系統(tǒng)區(qū)位選擇模型的缺陷(魯明泓,1999)。此外,本文創(chuàng)新性提出“母國特定優(yōu)勢”思想,母國作用影響企業(yè)ODI投資行為研究構(gòu)建系統(tǒng)的分析框架,并夯實既有FDI理論關(guān)于企業(yè)所有權(quán)優(yōu)勢研究。從實證層面看,發(fā)現(xiàn)了一條特殊的中國ODI區(qū)位選擇經(jīng)驗規(guī)律,那就是在2003-2010年中國ODI集中在三類制度環(huán)境和資源稟賦迥異的東道國。此外,還解釋了中國國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型如何造成ODI區(qū)位選擇偏好特征,關(guān)鍵在于母國特定優(yōu)勢邏輯下的政府作用。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of 1978, China ODI went dormant for more than twenty years, until 2002 to explosive growth caused the attention of the world, also in the past ten years, the field of IB ODI China emerged a large number of research literature, a heated discussion around the particularity of China ODI investment, lie in this round of discussion of deep thinking behind for, whether Chinese ODI special representation needs to break through the existing FDI theory, or simply to both expand China dimension theory? That is the classic "Chinese theory of business V.S. Theory of Chinese business (Alon and Child," about 2011). Although this conclusion, but the existing research scholars unable to agree on which is right. Agree to focus on home country perspective, will have Chinese ODI analysis Chinese embedded in the domestic background of macro economic development, and reached a consensus: the current economic transformation is almost Chinese special Chinese ODI The main cause.
The continuation of this research ideas, and make up the existing international business theory research is lack of system framework of Chinese ODI location choice behavior, this paper is compatible with the appropriate technology theory to build home advantage role of macroeconomic factors and micro enterprise investment behavior of the bridge location selection system using system. In this paper the emerging FDI theory and traditional FDI theory on the advantage of enterprise ownership the discussion on the motivation of enterprise investment and a framework for analysis, heterogeneity of enterprises using the idea of new trade theory, the modified HMCFMECM model to construct a general model of enterprise ODI location; on this basis, the system compatibility and appropriate technology in two aspects of home ownership advantages from pumping out of the summarized as "country specific advantage", and country specific advantages including system suitable for embedding and technology advantages. Thus, we get "ODI enterprise location selection model -- home macro factors point model -- country specific advantages influence enterprise location choice of ODI" which is a complete chain of logic based on the core content of this paper is that: the selection mechanism of enterprise location specific advantage ODI home. In addition, the mechanism of selection framework ODI location specific advantage of home enterprises next, Chinese revealed in ODI's home country under the background of transformation, to serve as the government to promote marginal industrial transfer and location Limited (location bound) resource acquisition tool, which is affected by the government function adjustment, showing location select preferences.
This paper mainly obtains the following three conclusions: first, country specific advantage to promote the traditional ODI investment system and the technology environment and the home country similar host. Second, country specific advantages to promote the strategy of ODI investment system and the technology environment and the home country moderate. The gap between the Eastern Road third, in the economic transition background, strengthen government Chinese ODI country specific advantage, to 2003-2010 years Chinese ODI stable concentrated in three categories, a total of 50 countries, respectively: abundant natural resources but high risk countries, cheap labor abundant countries, strategic assets and China abundant but had developed countries close FDI exchanges.
The responses to the location China whether ODI has special argument that China ODI enterprise investment is not divorced from the profit maximization hypothesis of rational economic man, and the China ODI behavior nor from the basis of enterprise ownership advantage, and the advantage of enterprise ownership is the starting point for analysis of the enterprise ODI IB. So the location of Chinese ODI the special argument is: at the theoretical level is not divorced from the general analysis framework in the field of IB location choice China ODI, which has shown not for the first national enterprise ODI "general rules", the key reason is that the current enterprise ownership advantage Chinese ODI enterprises to carry out overseas investment with the advantages of universal the developed countries have non ODI companies, but a large proportion from the home country specific advantages. Chinese economic transformation of the special economic reality to bus The country's specific advantages have certain particularity, which is why China's ODI has shown a stable three type of location preference.
The innovation of this paper is mainly embodied in two aspects: from the theoretical perspective, the difference of ODI between the traditional type and investment strategy at the same time, the two types of enterprise ODI investment behavior unified to the same location choice model, for the subsequent research of enterprise location choice model framework system. For both the lack of location system IB the choice of model defects (Lu Minghong, 1999). In addition, this paper proposes an innovative "country specific advantages" thought, the effects of ODI on home country enterprise investment behavior analysis framing system, and lay a solid foundation for both the FDI theory about enterprise ownership advantage research. From the empirical perspective, found a special location China ODI choose the experience rule, that is 2003-2010 years Chinese ODI concentrated in the three types of institutional environment and resource endowments of different host countries. In addition, it is also explained how Chinese domestic economic restructuring made ODI The feature of preference preference lies in the role of the government in the logic of the specific advantage of the mother country.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.6;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李國平;對外直接投資的區(qū)位選擇與基本分析框架[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2000年01期

2 何本芳;張祥;;我國企業(yè)對外直接投資區(qū)位選擇模型探索[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2009年02期

3 薛求知;朱吉慶;;中國對外直接投資與“走出去”戰(zhàn)略:理論基礎(chǔ)與經(jīng)驗分析[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

4 張宗慶;我國企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新不足的路徑依賴[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2000年12期

5 張宏;王建;;東道國區(qū)位因素與中國OFDI關(guān)系研究——基于分量回歸的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2009年06期

6 王鳳彬;楊陽;;我國企業(yè)FDI路徑選擇與“差異化的同時并進”模式[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年02期

7 林勇;海外華商資源與我國企業(yè)海外投資戰(zhàn)略淺析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2004年02期

8 江心英;國際直接投資區(qū)位選擇綜合動因假說[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2004年06期

9 杜群陽;;R&D全球化、反向外溢與技術(shù)獲取型FDI[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2006年12期

10 張新樂;王文明;王聰;;我國對外直接投資決定因素的實證研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2007年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王建;中國對外直接投資的一般均衡分析[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

2 許春明;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度與經(jīng)濟增長的機制研究[D];同濟大學(xué);2008年

3 陳艷艷;知識吸收能力對企業(yè)技術(shù)能力的影響研究[D];中南大學(xué);2010年

4 王方方;企業(yè)異質(zhì)性條件下中國對外直接投資區(qū)位選擇研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2012年

5 姜雨;人力資本與技術(shù)選擇適配性研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2012年

6 鄧海濱;制度安排影響技術(shù)進步的經(jīng)驗研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1670291