本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國服務(wù)業(yè)承接FDI與國際外包的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)比較　出處：《東華大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 服務(wù)業(yè)FDI 國際服務(wù)外包 技術(shù)溢出比較

【摘要】：隨著全球服務(wù)業(yè)的飛速發(fā)展,服務(wù)業(yè)的跨國轉(zhuǎn)移已成為經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的一個(gè)重要部分,作為新興的發(fā)展中國家,我國已經(jīng)以承接服務(wù)業(yè)跨國轉(zhuǎn)移東道國的身份逐漸融入了這一進(jìn)程。與此同時(shí),信息技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展使得服務(wù)業(yè)跨國轉(zhuǎn)移的方式逐漸多元化,從20世紀(jì)90年代服務(wù)業(yè)FDI占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位,到新興的國際服務(wù)外包盛行,兩種轉(zhuǎn)移模式并存已經(jīng)引起了學(xué)術(shù)界的普遍關(guān)注。但兩者在形式和內(nèi)容上、行業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)上、技術(shù)密集度上及人力資本需求程度上的差異使他們對作為承接國的中國具有不同的技術(shù)提升效應(yīng),并且兩者之間還存在某種內(nèi)在聯(lián)系。本文旨在通過理論分析和實(shí)證分析等手段對兩種承接模式進(jìn)行技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)的比較,進(jìn)而為中國制定技術(shù)最大化的承接政策提供理論依據(jù)。 全文主體主要分為三個(gè)部分：首先從服務(wù)業(yè)FDI和國際服務(wù)外包的概念及兩者間區(qū)別出發(fā),研究兩者技術(shù)效應(yīng)差距的原因；接著基于柯布道格拉斯函數(shù),建立計(jì)量模型對兩種承接模式的技術(shù)外溢效應(yīng)進(jìn)行比較,得到一個(gè)用以技術(shù)溢出比較的具體模型形式；以此為基礎(chǔ),利用中國服務(wù)業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)將計(jì)量模型量化,得到兩種模式的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)在服務(wù)業(yè)總體層面和行業(yè)部門層面之間的不同比較結(jié)果,作為補(bǔ)充,推測并驗(yàn)證了服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對承接國際服務(wù)外包的促進(jìn)作用,再分析這種作用對技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)比較結(jié)果的影響,使得基于FATs (Foreign Affiliate In Services)的FDI成為了政策制定中必須要考慮到的另一個(gè)方面；最終以比較結(jié)果為根據(jù),提出使中國在承接服務(wù)業(yè)FDI和國際服務(wù)業(yè)外包兩種模式中技術(shù)最大化的政策建議。 研究結(jié)果表明：第一,服務(wù)業(yè)FDI和國際服務(wù)外包本質(zhì)和形式上的不同決定了兩者對承接國呈現(xiàn)出不同的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)；第二,對中國而言,服務(wù)業(yè)總體和傳統(tǒng)服務(wù)業(yè)層面FDI具有更高的技術(shù)提升效應(yīng),而新興服務(wù)業(yè)層面國際服務(wù)外包更能提升技術(shù)水平,行業(yè)分布差異使得政策制定也具有行業(yè)部門的區(qū)別；第三,基于FATs的FDI對承接國際服務(wù)外包有促進(jìn)作用,在新興服務(wù)部門促進(jìn)對此類型FDI的引入更能提升中國的技術(shù)水平。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of global service industry, international transfer of the service industry has become an important part of economic globalization, as a new developing country, China has to undertake international services transfer host identity gradually integrated into the process. At the same time, the rapid development of information technology makes the service multinational transfer mode gradually diversified, occupy the dominant position from 1990s services FDI, international service outsourcing to emerging popularity, the coexistence of two kinds of transfer mode has attracted widespread attention in the academic circles. But both in form and content, industry structure, differences in technology intensive and human capital demand extent so that they have different technology promoting effect to undertake as a country Chinese, and also some internal relations between them. Through theoretical analysis and empirical analysis in the two The comparison of technology spillover effects is carried out in this model, which provides a theoretical basis for China to formulate a technology maximization policy.
The main text is divided into three parts: firstly, the concept and service industry both from the FDI and the difference of international service outsourcing, studies the reasons both technology effect gap; then based on Cobb Douglas function, an econometric model to undertake two kinds of mode of the technology spillover effect comparison, a specific form of the model the comparison of technology spillover; on this basis, the use of China services data quantification, get the technology spillover effect of the two modes in the service industry overall level and industry level between different comparison results, as a supplement, and verify the conjecture of FDI in service industry on international service outsourcing promotion effects further analysis of this effect on the technology spillover effect comparison results, which is based on FATs (Foreign Affiliate In Services FDI) has become a policy must be considered in the On the other hand, based on the comparative results, we put forward policy recommendations to maximize China's technology in the two modes of FDI outsourcing and international service outsourcing.
The results show that: first, FDI in service industry and international service outsourcing and nature of different forms of both decided to undertake country presents the technology spillover effect of different; second, the China, service industry and traditional service industry, the overall level of FDI has higher technology promotion effect, while new services international service level outsourcing can enhance the level of technology, industry distribution difference makes policy difference with industry sector; third, based on the FATs FDI to promote the role of international service outsourcing, in the emerging service sector to promote the introduction of this type of FDI can improve the technology level of China.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F719;F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬衛(wèi)紅;張娟;;我國發(fā)展服務(wù)外包的制約因素及對策思考[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2007年12期

2 高凌云;程敏;;服務(wù)業(yè)務(wù)離岸的發(fā)展邏輯與現(xiàn)實(shí)路徑[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2007年08期

3 黃燁菁;;外國直接投資的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——對中國四大高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年07期

4 陳景華;;服務(wù)業(yè)離岸外移的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年02期

5 竺彩華;鐘茂潔;;中國承接服務(wù)外包中的FDI因素研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年09期

6 曹慧平;;發(fā)展中國家在承接國際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移過程中的模式選擇[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2010年04期

7 趙楠;李靜;;中國發(fā)展服務(wù)外包的路徑選擇[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2007年03期

8 胡蕓;與FDI相關(guān)的服務(wù)功能的離岸和中國的方略[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2005年05期

9 何潔;外國直接投資對中國工業(yè)部門外溢效應(yīng)的進(jìn)一步精確量化[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年12期

10 秦曉鐘;淺析外商對華直接投資技術(shù)外溢效應(yīng)的特征[J];投資研究;1998年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1407899