【摘要】：自從中國(guó)加入WT0后,憑借全球產(chǎn)業(yè)階梯化轉(zhuǎn)移,裝備制造業(yè)得到了迅猛的發(fā)展。目前隨著勞動(dòng)力成本優(yōu)勢(shì)逐漸的流失、進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易的制約和國(guó)內(nèi)外競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手的技術(shù)壁壘,中國(guó)裝備制造業(yè)正面臨著發(fā)展模式轉(zhuǎn)型的問(wèn)題。企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的增長(zhǎng)從之前依靠高損耗、高投資、重污染和低效能的發(fā)展模式轉(zhuǎn)移到注重技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、提高生產(chǎn)效率和資源利用率上來(lái)。裝備制造業(yè)是我國(guó)民族性產(chǎn)業(yè),它已成為中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)和國(guó)際地位提高的支柱性力量。但是與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家相比,我國(guó)裝備制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力還是相對(duì)薄弱,并且很多企業(yè)缺乏主動(dòng)創(chuàng)新意識(shí),因此企業(yè)盈利能力還未得到應(yīng)有的提高。自主研發(fā)進(jìn)行技術(shù)創(chuàng)新或工藝的改進(jìn)是增強(qiáng)企業(yè)盈利能力,提高競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的有力武器。在這樣的大背景下,以裝備制造業(yè)為例研究技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力與盈利能力的關(guān)系有著重要意義。 本文以技術(shù)創(chuàng)新四種基礎(chǔ)理論出發(fā),參考和梳理了技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力、企業(yè)盈利能力以及技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力與盈利能力之間關(guān)系的國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),并對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力和企業(yè)盈利能力的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行界定,以國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力影響盈利能力的指標(biāo)為基礎(chǔ),選取科研人員數(shù)量、RD經(jīng)費(fèi)內(nèi)部支出、技術(shù)改造支出、專(zhuān)利申請(qǐng)數(shù)量和新產(chǎn)品銷(xiāo)售收入5個(gè)指標(biāo)來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力,并將這些指標(biāo)分為資源投入型和效益產(chǎn)出型兩大類(lèi)。用主營(yíng)業(yè)務(wù)利潤(rùn)率指標(biāo)來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)盈利能力,并建立多元線(xiàn)性回歸模型。本文立足于裝備制造業(yè)7個(gè)子行業(yè),對(duì)樣本選取2002年到2013年的12年數(shù)據(jù)作為研究對(duì)象進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。首先對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)7個(gè)子行業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力指標(biāo)和盈利能力指標(biāo)做描述性統(tǒng)計(jì),并從中得出一些基本結(jié)論,然后對(duì)變量之間做相關(guān)性分析并提出相應(yīng)假設(shè),最后運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件對(duì)樣本做線(xiàn)性回歸進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證了技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力對(duì)盈利能力的影響。 實(shí)證結(jié)果表明：裝備制造業(yè)科研人員數(shù)量與盈利能力呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,RD經(jīng)費(fèi)內(nèi)部支出與盈利能力呈負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系,技術(shù)改造支出與盈利能力呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,專(zhuān)利申請(qǐng)數(shù)量、新產(chǎn)品銷(xiāo)售收入都與盈利能力呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,其中科研人員數(shù)量、技術(shù)改造支出和專(zhuān)利申請(qǐng)數(shù)量都與盈利能力關(guān)系顯著。 最后根據(jù)實(shí)證結(jié)果分析原因,并從宏觀層面和微觀層面為中國(guó)裝備制造業(yè)通過(guò)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力來(lái)提高盈利能力提出五點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:Since China's entry into the WT0, with the global industrial ladder transfer, the equipment manufacturing industry has been developing rapidly. At present, with the gradual loss of the labor cost advantage, the restriction of import and export trade and the technical barriers of competitors at home and abroad, China's equipment manufacturing industry is facing the problem of the transformation of the development model. The development model, which relies on high loss, high investment, heavy pollution and inefficient energy, has shifted to focus on technological innovation and improve production efficiency and resource utilization. The equipment manufacturing industry is a national industry in China. It has become a pillar of China's economic growth and international status improvement. But compared with developed countries, China's equipment system is compared. The technological innovation ability of manufacturing industry is still relatively weak, and many enterprises lack the awareness of initiative innovation. Therefore, the profitability of enterprises has not been improved. The improvement of technological innovation or technology by independent research and development is a powerful weapon to enhance the profitability and competitiveness of enterprises. Under such a background, the equipment manufacturing industry is used as an example. The relationship between technological innovation capability and profitability is of great significance.
Based on the four basic theories of technological innovation, this paper refers to and combs the domestic and foreign related literature on the relationship between technological innovation ability, enterprise profitability, technological innovation ability and profitability, and defines the technical innovation ability and the connotation of enterprise profitability, which can affect the profitability of technical innovation ability at home and abroad. On the basis of the index of force, we select the number of scientific research personnel, the internal expenditure of RD funds, the expenditure of technical transformation, the number of patent applications and the sales income of new products to evaluate the technological innovation ability, and divide these indexes into two categories: resource input type and benefit output type. Based on the 7 sub industries of the equipment manufacturing industry, this paper makes an empirical study on the sample selected from 2002 to 2013 as the research object. First, this paper makes a descriptive statistics on the technical innovation capability index and profitability index of the 7 sub industries of the equipment manufacturing industry, and draws some basic conclusions and then the variables. The correlation analysis is made and the corresponding hypothesis is put forward. Finally, the linear regression of statistical software is used to further verify the impact of technological innovation ability on profitability.
The empirical results show that the number of scientific research personnel in the equipment manufacturing industry has a positive correlation with the profitability. The internal expenditure of RD funds has a negative correlation with the profitability, and there is a positive correlation between the technological transformation expenditure and the profitability. The number of patent applications and the sales revenue of the new products are positively related to the profitability. The cost of retrofit and the number of patent applications are significantly related to profitability.
Finally, the reasons are analyzed on the basis of the empirical results, and five suggestions are put forward for China's equipment manufacturing industry to improve its profitability through technological innovation ability from the macro level and micro level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F426.4;F273.1;F272.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃健,周德群,莊長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn);企業(yè)盈利能力綜合衡量分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2005年03期

2 張寶清;;上市公司盈利能力分析指標(biāo)探討[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2006年08期

3 莫生紅;李明偉;;上市公司盈利能力綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型的構(gòu)建[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2007年01期

4 王燁;游春;;R&D投入與績(jī)效相關(guān)關(guān)系實(shí)證研究——基于中小企業(yè)板上市公司面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2009年12期

5 羅紹德;劉春光;;企業(yè)R&D投入活動(dòng)的影響因素分析——基于企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)資源觀[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2009年01期

6 王玉春;郭媛嫣;;上市公司R&D投入與產(chǎn)出效果的實(shí)證分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年06期

7 張俊瑞,賈宗武,孫玉梅;上市公司盈利能力的因子分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2004年06期

8 李慶東;企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系與評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[J];遼寧石油化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

9 王章豹;孫陳;;基于主成分分析的裝備制造業(yè)行業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年12期

10 賈生華;疏禮兵;鄔愛(ài)其;;民營(yíng)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力的影響因素及其差異分析——以浙江省為例[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2142868