本文選題：發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家 + 裝備制造業(yè)　； 參考：《商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)》2015年10期

【摘要】：美國(guó)、日本、韓國(guó)、德國(guó)的裝備制造業(yè)在國(guó)際上處于領(lǐng)先地位,它們憑借在裝備制造業(yè)上的優(yōu)勢(shì)成為工業(yè)強(qiáng)國(guó)。這四個(gè)國(guó)家的裝備制造業(yè)由于演化路徑不同,因而四國(guó)分別代表了不同的升級(jí)模式,在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力提升方面相應(yīng)地呈現(xiàn)出不同的特點(diǎn)。我國(guó)在裝備制造業(yè)方面總產(chǎn)值較高,但是關(guān)鍵技術(shù)上較上述四國(guó)還有不小的差距。通過(guò)借鑒美、日、韓、德四國(guó)在裝備制造業(yè)上的不同經(jīng)驗(yàn),有利于暢通我國(guó)裝備制造業(yè)的發(fā)展途徑。
[Abstract]:The United States, Japan, South Korea and Germany are leading the world in equipment manufacturing, and they have become industrial powers by virtue of their advantages in equipment manufacturing. Because of the different evolution paths of the equipment manufacturing industry in these four countries, the four countries represent different upgrading modes and present different characteristics in terms of competitiveness. China has a high gross output value in equipment manufacturing industry, but there is still a big gap in key technology compared with the above four countries. By drawing lessons from the different experiences of the United States, Japan, Korea and Germany in the equipment manufacturing industry, it is helpful to unblock the development of China's equipment manufacturing industry.
【作者單位】： 中共黑龍江省委黨校;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F426.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 邱志君;魏芳;;裝備制造企業(yè)爭(zhēng)取政策資金工作的探討[J];現(xiàn)代工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)和信息化;2013年16期

，

本文編號(hào)：2098935