本文選題：鋼鐵行業(yè) + 產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩�。� 參考：《蘭州商學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩問(wèn)題逐漸凸現(xiàn)。特別是2008年金融危機(jī)以后，產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩更加嚴(yán)重。鋼鐵行業(yè)作為我國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的支柱產(chǎn)業(yè)，一直是產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的重點(diǎn)防治對(duì)象，不過(guò)由于近幾年來(lái)鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩愈加嚴(yán)重，鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的治理變得愈加棘手。鑒于此，有必要對(duì)我國(guó)鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的形成機(jī)理進(jìn)行一次系統(tǒng)的研究和論證。 本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容主要分為六大部分：第一部分是緒論，引出問(wèn)題的背景，簡(jiǎn)要直接的引用馬克思的名言對(duì)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩做出了評(píng)判，，并指出了研究意義，思路和方法；第二部分是文獻(xiàn)綜述，對(duì)鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的形成機(jī)理及其他相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行綜述，并引出了自己的研究思路；第三部分，以鋼鐵行業(yè)和企業(yè)為研究的切入點(diǎn)，提出了鋼鐵企業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的動(dòng)機(jī)，并提出了這樣一個(gè)假設(shè)：鋼鐵企業(yè)過(guò)度投資帶來(lái)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩是由于企業(yè)自身動(dòng)機(jī)引起的，并且和體制性與市場(chǎng)性因素是分不開(kāi)的。第四部分，通過(guò)對(duì)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩體制性和結(jié)構(gòu)性因素的分析，得出了體制性因素是幫助企業(yè)進(jìn)入鋼鐵行業(yè)而不退出的主要因素，也解釋了結(jié)構(gòu)性因素帶來(lái)企業(yè)的大量落后產(chǎn)能，卻因?yàn)檩^高的退出壁壘而得以長(zhǎng)期存在；第五部分，利用SPASS17.0軟件，以鋼鐵企業(yè)投資額為對(duì)象，針對(duì)第三部分提出的假設(shè)對(duì)鋼鐵行業(yè)投資過(guò)度產(chǎn)生的“羊群效應(yīng)”進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證；第六部分，得出結(jié)論和提出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策建議。 本文認(rèn)為，我國(guó)鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩，不是單純的體制性或是結(jié)構(gòu)性過(guò)剩，更不能將我國(guó)鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩完全推責(zé)給體制性問(wèn)題或者結(jié)構(gòu)性問(wèn)題，要基于鋼鐵企業(yè)這一微觀(guān)個(gè)體行為來(lái)分析。這也正是本文的創(chuàng)新和貢獻(xiàn)之處，即以從鋼鐵行業(yè)和企業(yè)為研究起點(diǎn)，結(jié)合體制性和結(jié)構(gòu)性過(guò)剩，并輔以實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)，得出了這樣一個(gè)結(jié)論：我國(guó)鋼鐵行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩是鋼鐵企業(yè)在當(dāng)前不完善市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體系下的“近乎理性”的選擇，而體制性和結(jié)構(gòu)性因素幫助鋼鐵企業(yè)完成了這樣一個(gè)選擇。
[Abstract]:In recent years , the problem of capacity surplus has gradually increased . Especially after the financial crisis of 2008 , the excess capacity is more serious . As a pillar industry in China ' s national economy , the steel industry has been the focus of excess capacity . However , the excessive capacity of steel industry has become more and more difficult in recent years . In view of this , it is necessary to study and demonstrate the formation mechanism of excess capacity of steel industry in China .

The research content of this paper is divided into six parts : the first part is the introduction , the background of the lead - out problem , the concise direct reference to Marx ' s famous words to judge the excess capacity , and points out the research significance , the thought and the method ;
The second part is the literature review , summarizes the formation mechanism and other related research of the excess capacity of steel industry , and draws out its own research thinking ;
The third part , taking the iron and steel industry and the enterprise as the research point , puts forward the motive of the excess capacity of the steel enterprise , and puts forward the assumption that the excessive investment of the iron and steel enterprise brings the excess capacity due to the enterprise ' s own motives , and the institutional and market factors are inseparable . The fourth part , through the analysis of the excess capacity and structural factors , has obtained the main factor that helps the enterprise to enter the steel industry without exiting , but also explains that the structural factors bring about the large amount of backward capacity of the enterprise , but can be existed for a long time because of the higher exit barrier .
In the fifth part , by using SPAS S17 . 0 software , the investment amount of iron and steel enterprises is regarded as the object , and the " herd effect " generated by overinvestment in the steel industry is verified against the assumption of the third part .
The sixth part , draws the conclusion and puts forward the corresponding countermeasure suggestion .

This paper argues that the excess capacity of steel industry in China is not a simple institutional or structural surplus , and it is more difficult to blame the excessive capacity of the steel industry in our country . It is also the innovation and contribution of this paper .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F426.31

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王立國(guó);張洪偉;;地方政府公共投資制度與投資決策問(wèn)題研究——基于完善投資體制和投資決策科學(xué)化的文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2011年09期

2 王立國(guó);高越青;;基于技術(shù)進(jìn)步視角的產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩問(wèn)題研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年02期

3 王立國(guó);武文婷;;城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目市場(chǎng)化融資研究——基于專(zhuān)用性投資不足的視角[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2011年01期

4 張軍,威廉·哈勒根;轉(zhuǎn)軌經(jīng)濟(jì)中的“過(guò)度進(jìn)入”問(wèn)題──對(duì)“重復(fù)建設(shè)”的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

5 曹建海;我國(guó)重復(fù)建設(shè)的形成機(jī)理與政策措施[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年04期

6 楊蕙馨;中國(guó)企業(yè)的進(jìn)入退出——1985—2000年汽車(chē)與電冰箱產(chǎn)業(yè)的案例研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年03期

7 李軍杰;經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型中的地方政府經(jīng)濟(jì)行為變異分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年01期

8 江飛濤;陳偉剛;黃健柏;焦國(guó)華;;投資規(guī)制政策的缺陷與不良效應(yīng)——基于中國(guó)鋼鐵工業(yè)的考察[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年06期

9 江飛濤;曹建海;;市場(chǎng)失靈還是體制扭曲——重復(fù)建設(shè)形成機(jī)理研究中的爭(zhēng)論、缺陷與新進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年01期

10 江飛濤;李曉萍;;直接干預(yù)市場(chǎng)與限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng):中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的取向與根本缺陷[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年09期

本文編號(hào)：1949175