本文選題：綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率 + 環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)，我國(guó)工業(yè)行業(yè)的發(fā)展得到了巨大的發(fā)展，然而在中國(guó)工業(yè)快速發(fā)展的背后是資源的過(guò)度消耗以及環(huán)境的嚴(yán)重破壞，這兩大問(wèn)題已經(jīng)成為制約我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的強(qiáng)大阻力。全要素生產(chǎn)率一般是指經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)率扣除資本、勞動(dòng)要素投入的剩余部分，它代表的是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量的貢獻(xiàn)。而綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率則在全要素生產(chǎn)率測(cè)算的基礎(chǔ)上把環(huán)境污染相關(guān)指標(biāo)作為非期望產(chǎn)出納入到了全要素生產(chǎn)率測(cè)算體系中。所以，怎樣提高全要素生產(chǎn)率，提升工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)“質(zhì)“的內(nèi)涵是我國(guó)實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)綠色轉(zhuǎn)型，實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵。 本文在已有的研究基礎(chǔ)上，采用生產(chǎn)前沿最新的分析工具SBM方向性距離函數(shù)和Luenberger生產(chǎn)率指標(biāo)對(duì)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率進(jìn)行測(cè)算，結(jié)果顯示VRS假設(shè)下，我國(guó)工業(yè)2000-2011年綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率總值約為4.86%，技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是拉動(dòng)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)的主要因素；東部地區(qū)的綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率普遍大于中西部地區(qū)。其次，本文從環(huán)境規(guī)制績(jī)效角度與環(huán)境規(guī)制體系角度，分別對(duì)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率進(jìn)行回歸。從環(huán)境規(guī)制績(jī)效角度進(jìn)行回歸的結(jié)果顯示我國(guó)一階環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度對(duì)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響系數(shù)為負(fù)，而二階系數(shù)為正，說(shuō)明我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制與工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率之間的關(guān)系呈“U”型，隨著環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的不斷增大，環(huán)境規(guī)制的強(qiáng)度增加將促進(jìn)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率的增長(zhǎng)。為了考察不同環(huán)境規(guī)制體系對(duì)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響，，本文從環(huán)境規(guī)制的法律體系、方法體系、監(jiān)督體系、支撐體系中選取代表性的指標(biāo)對(duì)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率進(jìn)行回歸�？傮w來(lái)看，環(huán)境信訪(fǎng)監(jiān)督（LP）、環(huán)境工業(yè)治理投資（INV1）對(duì)改善全要素能源效率意義重大；排污費(fèi)收入（PI）對(duì)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響為負(fù)，環(huán)境執(zhí)法強(qiáng)度（LAW）、而環(huán)保機(jī)構(gòu)人數(shù)（EP）、三同時(shí)執(zhí)行環(huán)保投資（INV2）等指標(biāo)的統(tǒng)計(jì)顯著性較低，對(duì)工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響不大。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the development of China's industrial industry has been greatly developed. However, behind the rapid development of Chinese industry are the excessive consumption of resources and the serious damage to the environment.These two problems have become a strong resistance to the sustainable development of our economy.The total factor productivity generally refers to the economic growth rate deducts the capital, the labor factor input surplus part, it represents the economic development quality contribution.On the basis of total factor productivity measurement, green total factor productivity (TFP) takes environmental pollution related indicators as non-expected output into the total factor productivity measurement system.Therefore, how to improve the total factor productivity and the connotation of "quality" of industrial economy is the key to realize the green transformation of economy and realize sustainable development in our country.On the basis of existing research, this paper uses SBM directivity distance function and Luenberger productivity index to measure the green total factor productivity. The results show that under the VRS hypothesis,The total value of green total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese industry from 2000 to 2011 is about 4.86.The technological innovation is the main factor to promote the growth of green total factor productivity (TFP), and the green TFP in the eastern region is generally larger than that in the central and western regions.Secondly, from the perspective of environmental regulation performance and environmental regulation system, this paper regresses the total factor productivity of industrial green.From the point of view of environmental regulation performance, the results show that the influence coefficient of first-order environmental regulation intensity on industrial green total factor productivity is negative, while the second-order coefficient is positive.It is shown that the relationship between environmental regulation and total factor productivity of industry is of "U" type. With the increasing of environmental regulation intensity, the increase of environmental regulation intensity will promote the growth of industrial green total factor productivity.In order to investigate the influence of different environmental regulation systems on the green total factor productivity of industry, this paper discusses the legal system, method system and supervision system of environmental regulation.The representative indexes in the support system are selected to regress the total factor productivity of industrial green.In general, environmental petition supervision and environmental industrial governance investment (INV1) are of great significance in improving total factor energy efficiency, and the impact of sewage revenue on industrial green total factor productivity is negative.The intensity of environmental law enforcement is weak, while the number of environmental protection agencies is not significant, and the statistical significance of environmental protection investment is low, and the effect on the total factor productivity of industry green is not significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F224;F424;F205

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李俊;徐晉濤;;省際綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì)的分析——一種非參數(shù)方法的應(yīng)用[J];北京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

2 王詢(xún);張為杰;;環(huán)境規(guī)制、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與中國(guó)工業(yè)污染的區(qū)域差異——基于東、中、西部Panel Data的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2011年11期

3 胡曉珍;楊龍;;中國(guó)區(qū)域綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)差異及收斂分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2011年04期

4 黃平;胡日東;;環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新相互促進(jìn)的機(jī)理與實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2010年01期

5 葉祥松;彭良燕;;我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制下的規(guī)制效率與全要素生產(chǎn)率研究:1999-2008[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年02期

6 趙細(xì)康;環(huán)境政策對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

7 黃德春;劉志彪;;環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新——基于波特假設(shè)的企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年03期

8 龐瑞芝;李鵬;路永剛;;轉(zhuǎn)型期間我國(guó)新型工業(yè)化增長(zhǎng)績(jī)效及其影響因素研究——基于“新型工業(yè)化”生產(chǎn)力視角[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年04期

9 李小平;朱鐘棣;;中國(guó)工業(yè)行業(yè)的全要素生產(chǎn)率測(cè)算——基于分行業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù)的研究[J];管理世界;2005年04期

10 石風(fēng)光;;環(huán)境約束下的中國(guó)省區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)源泉的收斂機(jī)制分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2013年01期

本文編號(hào)：1759600