本文選題：生產(chǎn)者延伸責(zé)任　切入點：逆向供應(yīng)鏈　出處：《浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟(jì)和科技的快速發(fā)展,人類造成的廢舊電器電子產(chǎn)品越來越多,而回收再利用是解決當(dāng)前社會資源緊缺和環(huán)境污染問題的有效方法之一。在回收過程中,我們需要選擇合理的回收渠道、正確的再處理方式以及合適的定價策略,從而提高逆向供應(yīng)鏈的運行效率。實施生產(chǎn)者延伸責(zé)任(Extended Producer Responsibility, EPR)制度,能有效推動廢舊產(chǎn)品的回收再制造活動,而我國關(guān)于EPR制度的研究與實際應(yīng)用還處于初期的探索階段。因此探討EPR制度下廢舊電器電子產(chǎn)品的逆向供應(yīng)鏈回收定價與協(xié)調(diào),對于創(chuàng)建資源集約型社會、發(fā)展循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)具有重要意義。在本文研究中,考慮制造商同時承擔(dān)新產(chǎn)品制造與廢舊產(chǎn)品再制造,消費者對新產(chǎn)品與再制造產(chǎn)品有不同支付意愿。本文采用差異化定價策略對建立的Stackelberg模型進(jìn)行具體分析。同時,本文根據(jù)廢舊產(chǎn)品處理主體的不同,將廢舊電器電子產(chǎn)品的回收模式分為兩大類：(1)制造商處理回收模式；(2)專業(yè)拆解商處理模式。本文主要研究制造商處理回收模式中的制造商回收和銷售商回收兩種情況,以及拆解商處理模式下的拆解商回收與銷售商回收的情況,并在此基礎(chǔ)上詳細(xì)分析了不同回收模式分散決策下制造商、銷售商和拆解商各自的定價策略和利益情況以及集中決策下逆向供應(yīng)鏈整體收益情況。此外,基于企業(yè)效益最大化原則,研究了逆向供應(yīng)鏈內(nèi)部的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,采用獎懲機(jī)制來激勵供應(yīng)鏈成員的積極性,從而增加供應(yīng)鏈?zhǔn)找妗?br/>[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the global economy and technology, more and more waste electrical and electronic products caused by humans, while recycling is one of the effective methods to solve the current shortage of social resources and environmental pollution problems. In the recovery process, we need to choose the reasonable recycling channels, then the right way and the appropriate pricing strategy, so as to improve the the efficiency of reverse supply chain. The implementation of extended producer responsibility (Extended Producer, Responsibility, EPR) system can effectively promote the recycling of waste products and manufacturing activities, and the research about the EPR system and practical application in China is still in the early stage of exploration. So the study of reverse supply system of EPR waste electrical and electronic products recycling chain pricing and coordination, to create a resource intensive society, plays an important role in the development of circular economy. In this paper, considering the manufacturer of it. Take the new product manufacturing and remanufacturing of used products, consumers have different willingness to pay for new products and remanufactured products. This paper adopts the differential pricing strategy of a detailed analysis of the Stackelberg model. At the same time, according to the processing of waste products of different subjects, the recycling of waste electrical and electronic products are divided into two categories: (1) manufacturer recycling mode; (2) professional shipbreaker processing mode. This paper mainly studies the recycling mode in the manufacturers and distributors manufacturers recovery recovery of two, and the recovery and recycling dismantling business vendors under the mode of dismantling business processing, and on the basis of a detailed analysis of the different recycling modes of decentralized decision makers, vendors and shipbreaker their pricing strategies and interests and under centralized decision of reverse supply chain overall revenue. In addition, based on the enterprise's benefit The maximization principle studies the coordination mechanism within the reverse supply chain, and uses the reward and punishment mechanism to stimulate the enthusiasm of the supply chain members, thus increasing the supply chain revenue.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F713.2;F426.6
，

本文編號：1662469