網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者的替代責任
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-21 08:36
【摘要】：近十年,電子商務在我國得到了蓬勃的發(fā)展,然而假冒偽劣商品橫行,借助互聯(lián)網(wǎng),商家實施侵權行為的成本更低,侵權行為產(chǎn)生的影響也更加廣泛。網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者作為電子商務的特殊主體,在電子商務交易中獲得了巨大的利益,而商標權、著作權的權利人卻面臨著大規(guī)模的侵權行為,因此為了電子商務市場的健康發(fā)展,有必要平衡雙方的利益。替代責任的適用有利于調(diào)整雙方當事人的利益,促進網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者完善對交易平臺的監(jiān)督和管理,從而推動電子商務的健康發(fā)展。因此有必要研究我國網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者的替代責任。本文主要由三部分構成:本文第一部分主要對替代責任的概念、特征以及范圍進行比較分析,來論述替代責任的實質意義以及理論基礎。本文認為,替代責任是英美法系特有概念,其不同于大陸法系的為他人行為之責任。替代責任是指第三人基于與行為人的特殊關系而承擔的責任,替代責任不同于第三人基于違反自己對行為人的義務或對受害人的義務而承擔的責任。替代責任最主要的特征是第三人與行為人之間具有控制關系。無論是大陸法系還是英美法系,一般都將雇主責任規(guī)定為替代責任,而將監(jiān)護人被監(jiān)護人責任排除在替代責任之外,美國則將替代責任發(fā)展到了獨立締約人之間的版權侵權領域,并認為在網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境中,替代責任同樣適用。本文即是在此基礎上分析網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者所承擔的替代責任。本文第二部分主要分析網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者替代責任的產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展及其構成要件。本部分通過分析美國判例法上的獨立締約人之間的替代責任的發(fā)展,確定網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者替代責任的構成要件:對侵權行為具有控制的權利和能力并能從中獲取直接的經(jīng)濟利益。本文通過對美國判例的比較分析,認為構成要件中的控制標準宜采用實際控制標準,而直接經(jīng)濟利益的認定僅需要第三人獲得的經(jīng)濟利益與侵權行為具有因果關系。本文第三部分主要通過對我國關于網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者責任的立法以及司法實踐中的不足進行分析,確認我國并沒有關于網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者替代責任的規(guī)定,以致于司法實踐中難以運用。但我國網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者在某些情況下已經(jīng)具有承擔替代責任的條件與能力。本文第四部分基于第三部分的分析,對我國適用網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者替代責任提出以下建議:明確網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者的法律地位;建立多元責任形態(tài);,明確網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供者承擔替代責任的歸責原則——無過錯責任原則;同時基于我國國情,應將獨立締約人之間的替代責任同時適用于版權領域和商標權領域。
[Abstract]:In recent ten years, e-commerce has been developing vigorously in our country. However, fake and inferior goods are rampant. With the help of Internet, the cost of infringing acts is lower and the influence of infringing actions is more extensive. As a special subject of e-commerce, the provider of network trading platform has gained great benefits in e-commerce transactions, while the owners of trademark rights and copyrights are faced with large-scale infringement. Therefore, for the healthy development of e-commerce market, it is necessary to balance the interests of both sides. The application of alternative liability is beneficial to adjust the interests of both parties, promote the network trading platform providers to improve the supervision and management of the trading platform, and thus promote the healthy development of electronic commerce. Therefore, it is necessary to study the alternative responsibility of network trading platform providers in China. This paper mainly consists of three parts: the first part of this paper mainly analyzes the concept, characteristics and scope of substitution responsibility, to discuss the substantive significance and theoretical basis of substitution responsibility. This paper argues that alternative liability is a unique concept of Anglo-American law system, which is different from the civil law system of responsibility for the conduct of others. Alternative liability refers to the liability of the third party based on the special relationship with the actor, which is different from the liability of the third party based on the breach of its obligations to the actor or to the victim. The main feature of substitution liability is that there is a control relationship between the third party and the actor. In both civil and common law systems, employer liability is generally defined as an alternative liability, and guardianship is excluded from the substitute liability. The United States has developed alternative liability to copyright infringement among independent contracting parties, and believes that in the network environment, alternative liability is also applicable. This paper is based on the analysis of the network trading platform providers bear the alternative responsibility. The second part of this paper mainly analyzes the emergence and development of the substitution responsibility of network trading platform providers and its constituent elements. This section analyzes the development of alternative responsibilities between independent contracting parties in case law in the United States. To determine the constituent elements of the substitute liability of the network trading platform provider: to have the right and ability to control the tort and to obtain direct economic benefits from it. Through the comparative analysis of American jurisprudence, this paper holds that the control standard in the constituent elements should adopt the actual control standard, while the identification of direct economic interests only needs the economic benefit obtained by the third party and the tort has a causal relationship. The third part of this paper mainly through the analysis of our country on the network trading platform provider responsibility legislation and judicial practice deficiencies, confirm that our country does not have the provisions on the network trading platform provider substitution responsibility, As a result, it is difficult to use in judicial practice. However, China's network trading platform providers in some cases have the conditions and capabilities to assume alternative responsibilities. The fourth part of this paper, based on the analysis of the third part, puts forward the following suggestions: clarifying the legal status of the network trading platform providers, establishing the multi-liability form, and putting forward the following suggestions on the replacement responsibility of the network trading platform providers in China. At the same time, according to the national conditions of our country, the substitute liability between independent parties should be applied to copyright field and trademark right field, at the same time, the non-fault liability principle, which is the principle of no-fault liability, should be applied to the domain of copyright and trademark right at the same time.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923
[Abstract]:In recent ten years, e-commerce has been developing vigorously in our country. However, fake and inferior goods are rampant. With the help of Internet, the cost of infringing acts is lower and the influence of infringing actions is more extensive. As a special subject of e-commerce, the provider of network trading platform has gained great benefits in e-commerce transactions, while the owners of trademark rights and copyrights are faced with large-scale infringement. Therefore, for the healthy development of e-commerce market, it is necessary to balance the interests of both sides. The application of alternative liability is beneficial to adjust the interests of both parties, promote the network trading platform providers to improve the supervision and management of the trading platform, and thus promote the healthy development of electronic commerce. Therefore, it is necessary to study the alternative responsibility of network trading platform providers in China. This paper mainly consists of three parts: the first part of this paper mainly analyzes the concept, characteristics and scope of substitution responsibility, to discuss the substantive significance and theoretical basis of substitution responsibility. This paper argues that alternative liability is a unique concept of Anglo-American law system, which is different from the civil law system of responsibility for the conduct of others. Alternative liability refers to the liability of the third party based on the special relationship with the actor, which is different from the liability of the third party based on the breach of its obligations to the actor or to the victim. The main feature of substitution liability is that there is a control relationship between the third party and the actor. In both civil and common law systems, employer liability is generally defined as an alternative liability, and guardianship is excluded from the substitute liability. The United States has developed alternative liability to copyright infringement among independent contracting parties, and believes that in the network environment, alternative liability is also applicable. This paper is based on the analysis of the network trading platform providers bear the alternative responsibility. The second part of this paper mainly analyzes the emergence and development of the substitution responsibility of network trading platform providers and its constituent elements. This section analyzes the development of alternative responsibilities between independent contracting parties in case law in the United States. To determine the constituent elements of the substitute liability of the network trading platform provider: to have the right and ability to control the tort and to obtain direct economic benefits from it. Through the comparative analysis of American jurisprudence, this paper holds that the control standard in the constituent elements should adopt the actual control standard, while the identification of direct economic interests only needs the economic benefit obtained by the third party and the tort has a causal relationship. The third part of this paper mainly through the analysis of our country on the network trading platform provider responsibility legislation and judicial practice deficiencies, confirm that our country does not have the provisions on the network trading platform provider substitution responsibility, As a result, it is difficult to use in judicial practice. However, China's network trading platform providers in some cases have the conditions and capabilities to assume alternative responsibilities. The fourth part of this paper, based on the analysis of the third part, puts forward the following suggestions: clarifying the legal status of the network trading platform providers, establishing the multi-liability form, and putting forward the following suggestions on the replacement responsibility of the network trading platform providers in China. At the same time, according to the national conditions of our country, the substitute liability between independent parties should be applied to copyright field and trademark right field, at the same time, the non-fault liability principle, which is the principle of no-fault liability, should be applied to the domain of copyright and trademark right at the same time.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張佳佳;;論雇主替代責任制度的建構基礎[J];河北建筑科技學院學報(社科版);2006年03期
2 關懷;;一部法學研究的佳作——簡評《雇主替代責任研究》[J];河北法學;2010年07期
3 李小華;;以刑事替代責任遏制食品安全犯罪之我見[J];創(chuàng)新;2011年06期
4 白潔;李少偉;;我國雇主替代責任的立法規(guī)制檢討及其發(fā)展前景[J];西安文理學院學報(社會科學版);2013年01期
5 毛瑞兆;論雇主的替代責任[J];政法論壇;2004年03期
6 薛少峰;程序規(guī)定的實體法思考:試論雇傭關系的界定和雇主替代責任[J];前沿;2004年07期
7 林丹紅;;我國雇主替代責任制度之反思與重構[J];甘肅政法成人教育學院學報;2007年06期
8 王麗麗;;試論我國機動車車主替代責任[J];山西師大學報(社會科學版);2008年03期
9 曹艷春;;雇主替代責任的雇傭范圍之考量[J];法學雜志;2008年04期
10 曹艷春;;志愿者的雇主替代責任研究[J];政治與法律;2008年06期
相關重要報紙文章 前8條
1 徐愛國;雇主的替代責任[N];人民法院報;2003年
2 王竹 四川大學法學院;侵權法應當全面規(guī)定勞務替代責任[N];中國社會科學報;2009年
3 本報記者 田杰;員工吵架被氣死 企業(yè)緣何要擔責[N];工人日報;2008年
4 張進揚;用人單位替代責任的認定[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2014年
5 欄目主持人 中國人民大學民商事法律科學研究中心主任 教授 楊立新;侵權責任合并規(guī)定的利弊分析[N];法制日報;2009年
6 徐儉;何為雇主替代責任[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2001年
7 徐愛國;“借用人員規(guī)則”[N];人民法院報;2003年
8 美國賓夕法尼亞大學法學博士 萬柯;如何判定著作權侵權替代責任中的直接獲利[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權報;2014年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 陳偉;公法替代責任根據(jù)研究[D];山東大學;2011年
相關碩士學位論文 前10條
1 李丹丹;雇主替代責任研究[D];西南政法大學;2009年
2 張麗娜;雇主替代責任初探[D];蘇州大學;2009年
3 馬國棟;論雇主替代責任[D];中央民族大學;2011年
4 樊晴飛;自然人雇主的替代責任研究[D];華中師范大學;2012年
5 冷騰飛;論我國雇主替代責任[D];華東政法大學;2012年
6 高濱;論雇主替代責任[D];黑龍江大學;2013年
7 韓冰;淺析雇主替代責任[D];中國青年政治學院;2014年
8 姜鵬;使用者替代責任制度研究[D];安徽財經(jīng)大學;2015年
9 張m嫌，
本文編號：2444772
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/dianzishangwulunwen/2444772.html
最近更新
教材專著
