本文選題：買賣合同　切入點：風(fēng)險負擔(dān)　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會中,商品交換,商業(yè)買賣形式越來越復(fù)雜,越來越多樣化,很多的交易買賣雙方義務(wù)的完成是不同步的。標(biāo)的物存在的所有權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移與實際交付的不同步,讓人們提高了對買賣合同標(biāo)的物是存在毀損、滅失的風(fēng)險的認(rèn)識。買賣雙方當(dāng)事人之間如何分配風(fēng)險與損失,涉及合同雙方當(dāng)事人的利益。對于新型復(fù)雜買賣的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)問題,我國法律仍未有較完善的立法,風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則還沒有完善確立,有待進一步改進。顯而易見,為了緊跟著我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟高速發(fā)展的步伐、提高我國已加入世界貿(mào)易組織行列的需求。為此,研究買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則,從理論到實踐,都具有十分重要的意義。本文通過對買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則多方面研究,分析探究風(fēng)險負擔(dān)的本質(zhì)和規(guī)律,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)行風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則,加以分析比較,提出個人若干建議。本文分為三部分:第一章是緒論。說明選題意義,闡述完善我國風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則從理論到實踐都有著重要意義的。對買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)轉(zhuǎn)移規(guī)則的理論述評,闡述風(fēng)險隨所有權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移的物主承擔(dān)風(fēng)險原則,以及風(fēng)險隨交付轉(zhuǎn)移的交付主義原則這兩種立法模式。第二章是我國買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則的述評及其檢討。我國《中華人民共和國合同法》(以下簡稱《合同法》)中關(guān)于風(fēng)險負擔(dān)的規(guī)定,是選擇采用了交付主義的原則。本章對《合同法》風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則和風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則相關(guān)司法解釋進行述評。對我國買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則進行檢討:1.“交付主義”作為風(fēng)險負擔(dān)原則有合理性,但對不動產(chǎn)和需要登記才轉(zhuǎn)移所有權(quán)的重要的動產(chǎn)不適用。2.我國《合同法》對特殊買賣合同,比如當(dāng)買賣合同涉及貨物運輸時、路貨買賣、房屋買賣、試用買賣、司法拍賣和電子商務(wù)等,并沒有制定相應(yīng)的法條來處理這類事項的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)。第三章是我國現(xiàn)行風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則的完善。一、“交付主義”在《合同法》總則中的完善:在《合同法》總則中規(guī)定一般動產(chǎn)的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)轉(zhuǎn)移適用“交付主義”。不動產(chǎn)和需要登記才轉(zhuǎn)移所有權(quán)的重要的動產(chǎn)適用“所有人主義”。二、特殊買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則的完善。對買賣合同涉及貨物運輸時的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)、路貨買賣中的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)、房屋買賣中的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)、試用買賣中的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)、司法拍賣中的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)、電子商務(wù)中的風(fēng)險負擔(dān),結(jié)合國內(nèi)外法律理論和實踐,提出完善風(fēng)險負擔(dān)規(guī)則的一些建議。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the forms of commodity exchange and commercial trading are becoming more and more complex and diversified, and many of the obligations of both parties are not synchronized.The ownership transfer of the existence of the subject matter does not synchronize with the actual delivery, which improves people's understanding of the risk of damage and loss of the subject matter in the contract of sale and purchase.How to distribute the risk and loss between the buyer and seller involves the interests of both parties to the contract.There is still no perfect legislation on the risk burden of new complex trading in our country, and the rules of risk burden have not been established and need to be further improved.Obviously, in order to keep pace with the rapid development of China's socialist market economy, it is necessary for China to join the WTO.Therefore, it is of great significance to study the rules of risk burden of sale and purchase contract, from theory to practice.Based on the study of the rules of risk burden in the contract of sale and purchase, this paper analyzes and explores the essence and law of the burden of risk, analyzes and compares the rules of risk burden in our country, and puts forward some personal suggestions.This article is divided into three parts: the first chapter is an introduction.It is of great significance to explain the significance of choosing the topic and to perfect the rules of risk burden in China from theory to practice.This paper reviews the theory of the transfer rule of the risk burden in the contract of sale and purchase, and expounds two legislative models: the principle of the owner bearing the risk with the transfer of ownership, and the principle of the principle of delivering the risk with the transfer of the delivery.The second chapter is the review and review of the rules of the risk burden of the contract of sale and purchase in China.In the contract Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as contract Law), the principle of deliverance is adopted in the regulation of risk burden.This chapter reviews the relevant judicial interpretations of the risk burden rules and the risk burden rules in the contract Law.Review the rules of risk burden in China's contract of sale and purchase."delivability" is reasonable as a risk-bearing principle, but it does not apply to real estate and important movable property that requires registration in order to transfer ownership.The contract Law of our country deals with special sale contracts, such as when the contract of sale involves the transportation of goods, the sale of road goods, the sale of houses, the trial sale, the judicial auction, the electronic commerce, and so on.There is no law to deal with the risk burden of such matters.The third chapter is the perfection of the current risk burden rules in China.First, the perfection of "delivery doctrine" in the general principles of contract law: in the general principles of contract law, it is stipulated that the transfer of risk burden of ordinary movable property should be applied to "delivery doctrine".Immovable property and important movable property that requires registration in order to transfer ownership apply to "ownerism".Second, the perfection of the rules on the risk burden of the special sale contract.As to the risk burden in the contract of sale and purchase involving the transportation of goods, the risk burden in the sale of road goods, the risk burden in the house sale and purchase, the risk burden in the trial sale, the risk burden in the judicial auction, the risk burden in the electronic commerce,Combined with domestic and foreign legal theory and practice, some suggestions to perfect the rules of risk burden are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 郭翼;我國買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

2 陸倩;買賣合同標(biāo)的物風(fēng)險負擔(dān)制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 江妮伲;網(wǎng)絡(luò)買賣合同標(biāo)的物的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

4 李曉莎;買賣合同標(biāo)的物風(fēng)險負擔(dān)制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

5 楊瀟;論買賣合同中標(biāo)的物風(fēng)險轉(zhuǎn)移制度[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

6 徐戰(zhàn)英;論我國買賣合同標(biāo)的物的風(fēng)險轉(zhuǎn)移[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

7 程美姍;交付主義模式下買賣合同的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

8 郭麗萍;買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

9 陳健;論我國買賣合同中的風(fēng)險負擔(dān)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

10 趙志方;買賣合同風(fēng)險負擔(dān)制度研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1705431