發(fā)布時間：2018-03-25 12:02

  本文選題：電商交易平臺　切入點(diǎn)：注意義務(wù)　出處：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著電商交易平臺的多元化及綜合化,法律對其的規(guī)定不足以適用于各類具體的情形,如對電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)界定相對粗糙,是否違反注意義務(wù)作為電商交易平臺侵權(quán)的重要認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),卻沒有一個具體明確的條文來劃定電商交易平臺的注意義務(wù),究其根源,在于電商交易平臺業(yè)務(wù)模式的多樣化及內(nèi)容的綜合化�！肚謾�(quán)責(zé)任法》對電商交易平臺的具體規(guī)定不明確,而相關(guān)行業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也僅對電商平臺的基本功能及內(nèi)容做了簡要概括,除此之外,對于電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)的判斷多停留在司法實(shí)務(wù)及理論研究層面。不同類型的電商交易平臺所承擔(dān)的注意義務(wù)應(yīng)當(dāng)有所差異,以異質(zhì)性所涉及的不同因素作為判斷要件,對電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)的范圍做不同類型的討論。本文分四個部分進(jìn)行電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)的類型化分析。第一部分為電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)概說。該部分從電商交易平臺的法律定位入手,討論當(dāng)下電商交易發(fā)展水平下電商交易平臺的應(yīng)有之義,并分析電商交易平臺的基本法律構(gòu)成,結(jié)合相關(guān)注意義務(wù)的法律淵源,探討電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)的范圍及擴(kuò)張。第二部分為電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)類型化的合理性思考。該部分基于現(xiàn)有標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的局限討論類型化注意義務(wù)的必要性以及現(xiàn)實(shí)可行性,在必要性方面主要提出了電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)類型化的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求、對降低維權(quán)成本的需要及實(shí)現(xiàn)利益平衡等因素;在現(xiàn)實(shí)可行性方面分析了當(dāng)前電商交易平臺業(yè)務(wù)模式的多樣化及交易標(biāo)的的差異性。第三部分為電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)類型化原則與基礎(chǔ)。該部分首先提出電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)類型化的原則,在前兩部分理論論證類型化注意義務(wù)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,對比了電商交易平臺之間的相同點(diǎn)和不同點(diǎn)。第四部分為類型化的電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)。確立類型化注意義務(wù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),在此基礎(chǔ)上將電商交易平臺的注意義務(wù)范圍進(jìn)行具體劃分;并提出類型化電商交易平臺注意義務(wù)具有的兩種作用。
[Abstract]:With the diversification and integration of e-commerce trading platforms, the legal provisions on them are not sufficient to apply to various specific situations, such as the relatively rough definition of the duty of care of e-commerce trading platforms. Whether the breach of duty of care is an important criterion for the infringement of e-commerce trading platforms, but there is no specific and clear provision to delineate the duty of care of e-commerce trading platforms, so as to investigate the root causes. The reason lies in the diversification of the business model and the integration of the content of the e-commerce trading platform. The specific provisions of the platform are not clear in the Tort liability Law, and the relevant industry standards only briefly generalize the basic functions and contents of the platform. In addition, the judgment of the duty of care of the e-commerce trading platform mostly stays at the level of judicial practice and theoretical research. The duty of care undertaken by different types of e-commerce trading platforms should be different. Taking the different factors involved in heterogeneity as the judgment elements, This paper is divided into four parts to analyze the types of the duty of care of the platform. The first part is an overview of the duty of care of the electronic trading platform. Starting with the legal orientation of the e-commerce trading platform, This paper discusses the proper meaning of e-commerce trading platform under the current level of e-commerce transaction development, and analyzes the basic legal structure of e-commerce trading platform, combining with the legal origin of relevant duty of care. This part discusses the scope and expansion of the duty of care of e-commerce trading platform. The second part discusses the necessity and feasibility of the type of duty of care based on the limitations of existing standards. In the aspect of necessity, the paper puts forward the realistic demand of the type of duty of care, the need to reduce the cost of protecting the rights and the realization of the balance of interests, etc. In the aspect of practical feasibility, the paper analyzes the diversification of the business model and the difference of the trading target of the current e-commerce trading platform. The third part is the principle and foundation of the type of duty of care of the e-commerce trading platform. Firstly, this part puts forward the principle and foundation of the e-commerce. The trading platform pays attention to the principle of obligation typing, On the basis of the first two parts of the theoretical argumentation of the type of duty of care, combined with the development of reality, The fourth part is the duty of care of the type of e-commerce trading platform. Establish the standard of the type of duty of care. On this basis, the scope of duty of care of e-commerce trading platform is divided concretely, and the two functions of the duty of care of typed e-commerce trading platform are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周荊;楊琳;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺民事責(zé)任的類型化研究[J];人民司法(應(yīng)用);2016年34期

2 林承鐸;安妮塔;;數(shù)字版權(quán)語境下避風(fēng)港規(guī)則與紅旗原則的適用[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年07期

3 李士林;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者注意義務(wù)的設(shè)定[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年05期

4 何煉紅;鄧欣欣;;“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”時代我國電子商務(wù)平臺法律定位之反思[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

5 楊立新;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供者民法地位之展開[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

6 張富強(qiáng);許健聰;;完善我國著作權(quán)懲罰性賠償立法的思考——基于法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)“效益最大化原則”的分析[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年08期

7 劉風(fēng)景;;法律原則的結(jié)構(gòu)與功能——基于窗戶隱喻的闡釋[J];江漢論壇;2015年04期

8 張夢夏;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供者的義務(wù)與責(zé)任——基于消費(fèi)者保護(hù)的視角[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年04期

9 林沈緯;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商的注意義務(wù)認(rèn)定研究——以淘寶網(wǎng)為例,商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)認(rèn)定為中心[J];前沿;2013年19期

10 石必勝;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的事前知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審查義務(wù)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年09期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 張偉剛;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的合理注意義務(wù)分析[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 朱凱超;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的實(shí)質(zhì)審查義務(wù)[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 王蕾;網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者注意義務(wù)的認(rèn)定[D];寧波大學(xué);2015年

3 朱敬知;淘寶模式下C2C網(wǎng)絡(luò)購物合同若干法律問題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1663031