本文選題：二十國(guó)集團(tuán)　切入點(diǎn)：跨境電子商務(wù)　出處：《商業(yè)研究》2017年09期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)跨境電子商務(wù)實(shí)踐中,跨境電子商務(wù)公司為了擺脫產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量責(zé)任,往往反對(duì)傳統(tǒng)買(mǎi)賣契約論,否定其銷售者身份。因此,跨境電子商務(wù)合同的類型認(rèn)定存在買(mǎi)賣契約論、非買(mǎi)賣契約論和委托契約論三種分歧觀點(diǎn),但立基于確立買(mǎi)賣合同和委托合同基本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的差異,跨境電子商務(wù)合同無(wú)疑構(gòu)成買(mǎi)賣合同。時(shí)下正是《中華人民共和國(guó)電子商務(wù)法》制定階段,應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)跨境電子商務(wù)合同類型予以間接界定,繼而由最高人民法院最終定紛止?fàn)帯?br/>[Abstract]:In the practice of cross-border electronic commerce in China, in order to get rid of the responsibility of product quality, cross-border e-commerce companies often oppose the traditional contract theory of sale and purchase, and deny their identity as sellers. There are three different views on non-sale contract theory and entrustment contract theory, but based on the difference of establishing the basic standards of the purchase and sale contract and the entrustment contract, There is no doubt that cross-border electronic commerce contracts constitute sale contracts. It is now the stage of the formulation of the E-commerce Law of the people's Republic of China. The types of cross-border electronic commerce contracts should be indirectly defined, and then the Supreme people's Court will finally settle the dispute.
【作者單位】： 廈門(mén)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李伶俐;;我國(guó)電子商務(wù)合同的相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題探析[J];今日南國(guó)(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年07期

2 柴振國(guó),姜南;電子商務(wù)合同中的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

3 申文豐;;淺議電子商務(wù)合同網(wǎng)上支付的法律保護(hù)[J];企業(yè)技術(shù)開(kāi)發(fā);2008年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐婷婷;電子商務(wù)合同違約責(zé)任認(rèn)定與承擔(dān)法律研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1556634