【摘要】：京津冀協(xié)同化發(fā)展最早可以追溯到1982年的“首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈”規(guī)劃,隨著近些年的發(fā)展,京津冀地區(qū)是繼“長三角”、“珠三角”之后,國內(nèi)又一具有良好發(fā)展前景的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長極。但由于歷史因素等方面的影響,北京市、天津市、河北省三地的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不平衡,河北省由于處于產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度的低位,經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展相對緩慢,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)不太合理,工業(yè)基礎(chǔ)相對薄弱。同時(shí),在京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的背景下,河北省雖然處于欠發(fā)達(dá)省的地位,但是根據(jù)自身?xiàng)l件和當(dāng)前政策環(huán)境,承接好京津兩地的轉(zhuǎn)移產(chǎn)業(yè),并利用自身優(yōu)勢發(fā)展自己的特色產(chǎn)業(yè),優(yōu)化自身的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與布局是可行的,是具有良好前景的。本文主要從數(shù)據(jù)分析入手,通過京津冀三地全社會固定資產(chǎn)投資,三次產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),就業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),進(jìn)出口總額、實(shí)際利用外資額與經(jīng)濟(jì)外向度這些指標(biāo)的對比來說明三地經(jīng)濟(jì)上梯度差異的存在,給河北省承接京津兩地的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移提供了可能。接著通過數(shù)據(jù)計(jì)算出京津冀三地的工業(yè)各行業(yè)的區(qū)域配置系數(shù)(S)和區(qū)位商(LQ)的數(shù)值,反映出京津冀產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的大致情況及各自的優(yōu)劣勢產(chǎn)業(yè),進(jìn)而可以更加明確河北省承接京津兩地產(chǎn)業(yè)的路徑與策略。然后結(jié)合北京市、天津市的城市定位及河北自身?xiàng)l件、優(yōu)勢產(chǎn)業(yè)情況,選擇冶金礦產(chǎn)業(yè)、裝備制造業(yè)和醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)三個(gè)行業(yè)進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)分析。最后,結(jié)合近幾年實(shí)際情況對河北省產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移承接能力及影響因素的變化進(jìn)行分析,得出河北省在承接京津兩地產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移中的優(yōu)勢與劣勢,并有針對性地提出相關(guān)的對策建議。
[Abstract]:The coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei can be traced back to the plan of "Capital Economic Circle" in 1982. With the development of recent years, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is another economic growth pole with good prospects after the "Yangtze River Delta" and "Pearl River Delta". However, due to the influence of historical factors, the economic development of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei is not balanced. Because Hebei Province is at a low level of industrial gradient, the economic development is relatively slow, and the industrial structure is not very reasonable. The industrial base is relatively weak. At the same time, in the context of the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, Hebei Province is in the position of less developed province, but according to its own conditions and current policy environment, it undertakes the transfer industries between Beijing and Tianjin, and takes advantage of its own advantages to develop its own characteristic industries. Optimizing its industrial structure and layout is feasible and has good prospects. This article mainly starts from the data analysis, through the whole society fixed assets investment, the three industrial structure, the employment structure, the import and export total amount of the whole society of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, The comparison between the actual utilization of foreign capital and the degree of economic extroversion shows the existence of the economic gradient difference among the three regions, which provides the possibility for Hebei Province to undertake the industrial transfer between Beijing and Tianjin. Then, the regional allocation coefficient (S) and the location quotient (LQ) of the three industries in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei are calculated through the data, which reflects the general situation of the industrial structure of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei and their respective superior and inferior industries. Then we can more clearly understand the path and strategy of Hebei Province to undertake Beijing and Tianjin industries. Then combining with the city orientation of Beijing and Tianjin and Hebei's own conditions and the situation of superior industry, this paper chooses metallurgical and mining industry, equipment manufacturing industry and pharmaceutical manufacturing industry to carry on the key analysis. Finally, combining with the actual situation in recent years, this paper analyzes the changes of the industrial transfer capacity and its influencing factors in Hebei Province, and draws the conclusion that Hebei Province has the advantages and disadvantages in undertaking the industrial transfer between Beijing and Tianjin, and puts forward relevant countermeasures and suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北地質(zhì)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳愛芝;李國平;張杰斐;;京津冀地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)分工合作機(jī)理與模式研究[J];人口與發(fā)展;2015年06期

2 孫久文;姚鵬;;京津冀產(chǎn)業(yè)空間轉(zhuǎn)移、地區(qū)專業(yè)化與協(xié)同發(fā)展——基于新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)的分析框架[J];南開學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年01期

3 張貴;王樹強(qiáng);劉沙;賈尚鍵;;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)對接與轉(zhuǎn)移的京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2014年04期

4 張晨;;論產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與產(chǎn)業(yè)承接的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)[J];現(xiàn)代營銷(學(xué)苑版);2011年07期

5 任志軍;;區(qū)域間產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移及承接研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年12期

6 翟國濤;劉業(yè)興;;我國西部地區(qū)承接?xùn)|部地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的影響因素分析[J];科技信息;2009年27期

7 卿楓;鄭力丹;;中部六省承接?xùn)|部地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的問題探析[J];江淮論壇;2009年01期

8 石奇;張繼良;;區(qū)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)工業(yè)化的協(xié)調(diào)性[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年01期

9 李鋒;國內(nèi)外關(guān)于產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移問題研究觀點(diǎn)述評[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2004年06期

10 陳計(jì)旺;區(qū)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與要素流動的比較研究[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;1999年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 全詩凡;基于區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈視角的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化[D];南開大學(xué);2014年

2 王得新;專業(yè)化分工與都市圈形成演進(jìn)研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

3 王力年;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)協(xié)同發(fā)展理論研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 郎鄲妮;FDI對京津冀產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)同發(fā)展影響研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2015年

2 陳雅雯;京津冀區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)一體化現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2014年

3 陳啟斐;皖江城市帶產(chǎn)業(yè)承接能力差異性研究[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

4 林衡博;產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度轉(zhuǎn)移理論的實(shí)證研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2005年

5 謝小琴;產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度轉(zhuǎn)移理論與江西的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[D];南昌大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2289721