【摘要】：改革開放以后,我國經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)現(xiàn)了跨越式發(fā)展,城市建設(shè)的進(jìn)程不斷加速,大規(guī)模城市擴(kuò)張和舊城改造使城市房屋拆遷成為必然,同時城市房屋拆遷所引發(fā)的利益沖突和社會問題也在日益突出。但遺憾的是,我國城市房屋拆遷的相關(guān)立法不健全,現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)中又沒有明確且適用的程序規(guī)范細(xì)則。導(dǎo)致一方面,對公共利益定位不明,導(dǎo)致公共利益對合法私權(quán)的侵?jǐn)_;另一方面,在房屋拆遷過程中行政權(quán)力在無法律授權(quán)的情況下干預(yù)和參與民事行為,其中還存在暴力執(zhí)法行為,以上這些現(xiàn)象給建設(shè)和諧社會增加了不安定因素,引發(fā)了各類矛盾、沖突、群體性事件,嚴(yán)重破壞社會的和諧穩(wěn)定。近年來,我國也相繼出臺了一系列有關(guān)房屋拆遷、征收、補(bǔ)償?shù)姆煞ㄒ?guī),2011年《國有土地上房屋征收與補(bǔ)償條例》(以下簡稱《征收與補(bǔ)償條例》)的出臺,標(biāo)志著我國城市房屋拆遷的法律制度有了跨越式發(fā)展。雖然《征收與補(bǔ)償條例》在一定程度上緩解了我國拆遷過程中尖銳激烈的矛盾,但根本問題并沒有得到根治,全國各地因房屋拆遷引發(fā)的社會沖突依然頻發(fā)。筆者從拆遷程序規(guī)范法律角度,探索和思考我國目前城市房屋拆存在的問題和解決思路,力求不僅能為被拆遷人這一弱勢群體爭取更多的合法權(quán)益,也能為我國當(dāng)前城市房屋拆遷制度的立法出微薄之力。本文首先從宏觀角度分析了我國當(dāng)前拆遷的社會背景和現(xiàn)狀,通過列舉拆遷過程中出現(xiàn)的具有較大社會影響的群體性事件,剖析我國現(xiàn)行立法中關(guān)于拆遷法律法規(guī)存在的制度缺陷,通過分析利弊和影響,引出當(dāng)前我國城市房屋拆遷過程中完善程序規(guī)范的重要性。第一部分介紹我國城市房屋拆遷的立法發(fā)展,從憲法、法律、行政法規(guī)三個層次分析我國拆遷、征收的立法過程和現(xiàn)有的法律制度,并且總結(jié)成果,正視不足之處,由此引出當(dāng)前對我國城市房屋拆遷進(jìn)行法律制度完善、程序規(guī)范的重要性。第二部分以列舉方式介紹當(dāng)前我國城市房屋拆遷的現(xiàn)狀和拆遷過程中出現(xiàn)的基本矛盾。通過分析近幾年影響較大的因拆遷引發(fā)的群體性事件,闡述引發(fā)矛盾的主要原因。第三部分通是針對第二部分的問題和矛盾提出具體的建議和意見,側(cè)重于從程序規(guī)范的角度,從拆遷的工作流程、政府職能劃分、拆遷補(bǔ)償程序和拆遷救濟(jì)程序四個方面,結(jié)合實(shí)際情況,提出自己的見解,最后對我國城市房屋拆遷的發(fā)展做一個概括性的設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:After the reform and opening-up, China's economy has achieved great-leap-forward development, the process of urban construction has been accelerating, large-scale urban expansion and the transformation of the old cities have made the demolition of urban houses inevitable. At the same time, the conflicts of interest and social problems caused by urban housing demolition are becoming more and more prominent. Unfortunately, the relevant legislation of urban housing demolition in our country is not perfect, and there are no clear and applicable rules and regulations in the existing laws and regulations. On the one hand, the orientation of the public interest is unclear, which leads to the interference of the public interest to the legitimate private rights; On the other hand, in the process of house demolition, administrative power interferes with and participates in civil acts without legal authorization, and there are also violent law enforcement acts, which add unstable factors to the construction of a harmonious society. Caused all kinds of contradictions, conflicts, group events, seriously undermine the harmony and stability of society. In recent years, China has also issued a series of laws and regulations on house demolition, expropriation and compensation, and the 2011 regulations on Housing expropriation and compensation on State-owned Land (hereinafter referred to as "expropriation and compensation regulations"). It marks the leap-forward development of the legal system of urban housing demolition in China. Although the Law on Collection and compensation alleviates the sharp and fierce contradiction in the process of demolition in China to a certain extent, the fundamental problem has not been cured, and the social conflicts caused by house demolition all over the country are still frequent. From the legal point of view of the demolition procedure, the author explores and ponders the existing problems and solutions of urban housing demolition in our country, and strives not only to strive for more legitimate rights and interests for this vulnerable group of people who have been dismantled, but also to explore and consider the existing problems and solutions. It can also play a weak role in the legislation of the current urban housing demolition system in China. First of all, this paper analyzes the social background and current situation of the demolition in China from the macro point of view, and through enumerating the group events which appear in the process of demolition, which have a great social impact, This paper analyzes the system defects of the existing laws and regulations on demolition in our country. By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages and the influence, it leads to the importance of perfecting the procedural norms in the process of demolition of urban houses in our country. The first part introduces the legislative development of urban housing demolition in China, analyzes the legislative process of demolition, expropriation and the existing legal system from the three levels of constitution, law and administrative regulations, and sums up the achievements to face up to the shortcomings. This leads to the current legal system of urban housing demolition in China, the importance of procedural norms. The second part introduces the current situation of urban house demolition in China and the basic contradictions in the process of demolition. Through the analysis of the mass events caused by demolition in recent years, the main causes of the contradiction are expounded. The third part is to put forward specific suggestions and opinions on the problems and contradictions of the second part, focusing on four aspects: the work flow of demolition, the division of government functions, the compensation procedure of demolition and the relief procedure of demolition, from the point of view of procedural norms. Combined with the actual situation, the author puts forward his own opinions, and finally makes a general assumption on the development of urban housing demolition in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F299.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李趙奎;;城市房屋拆遷許可行為的法律思考[J];行政與法;2010年10期

2 王清;;國外城市房屋拆遷的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對我國的啟示[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

3 劉寧;梁宸;;房屋拆遷中土地使用權(quán)價值補(bǔ)償機(jī)制探討[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年05期

4 王太高;姚俊;趙杰;趙堅;;城市規(guī)劃區(qū)內(nèi)集體土地房屋拆遷制度研究[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2010年05期

5 豆星星;;論我國城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償制度的完善[J];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年04期

6 詹約倫;李雙元;;房屋拆遷中的公民憲法權(quán)力及其實(shí)現(xiàn)之實(shí)證分析[J];時代法學(xué);2009年03期

7 王瑞雪;顏廷武;;房屋拆遷中土地權(quán)利的征收與補(bǔ)償[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2008年01期

8 劉向民;;中美征收制度重要問題之比較[J];中國法學(xué);2007年06期

9 陶攀;2004年行政法年會“公共利益的界定”之議題研討綜述[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

10 胡建淼,邢益精;公共利益概念透析[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

，

本文編號：2445746