【摘要】：選取京津冀、長(zhǎng)三角和珠三角三大城市群,利用多個(gè)指標(biāo)模型綜合評(píng)判城市群生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚特征與發(fā)展規(guī)律。研究認(rèn)為,三大城市群生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚總體呈現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)上的分異和空間上的趨同。2003-2014年間,京津冀、長(zhǎng)三角城市群內(nèi)城市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)平均相對(duì)專業(yè)化程度均有增加,并主要表現(xiàn)為外圍地區(qū)拉動(dòng);京津冀、珠三角中心城市的相對(duì)多樣化程度有不同程度提高,城市職能趨向綜合化,外向生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)能力增強(qiáng)。進(jìn)而三大城市群形成了"專業(yè)化中心+專業(yè)化外圍"和"多樣化中心+專業(yè)化外圍"兩種不同的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚模式�？臻g集聚特征測(cè)度的結(jié)果顯示,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)在三大城市群內(nèi)部集聚均呈不均衡的極化發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。受城鎮(zhèn)化和工業(yè)化所處階段影響,十余年間,京津冀生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚幅度最大,相對(duì)于其他產(chǎn)業(yè)的區(qū)位吸引力最強(qiáng);長(zhǎng)三角生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)平均集中率最高;珠三角生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)相對(duì)于其他產(chǎn)業(yè)的集中程度,相對(duì)于全國(guó)的平均占有率均較低,行業(yè)發(fā)展的相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)有所減弱。
[Abstract]:This paper selects the three urban agglomerations of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta, and synthetically evaluates the agglomeration characteristics and development laws of producer services in urban agglomeration by using several index models. The study shows that the agglomeration of producer services in the three urban agglomerations presents economic differentiation and spatial convergence. From 2003 to 2014, the average relative specialization degree of producer services in cities in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations has increased. And mainly for the peripheral areas pull; In Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, the degree of relative diversification in the central city of the Pearl River Delta has been improved to varying degrees, the function of the city tends to be integrated, and the capacity of outward productive service has been enhanced. Then the three urban agglomerations form two different patterns of producer service agglomeration: specialization periphery of specialized center and specialization periphery of diversification center. The results of spatial agglomeration feature measurement show that producer services agglomeration in the three urban agglomerations shows an unbalanced polarization trend. Under the influence of urbanization and industrialization, the producer services in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei have the largest concentration range and the strongest regional attractiveness relative to other industries in the past ten years, and the average concentration rate of producer services in the Yangtze River Delta is the highest. Compared with other industries, the producer services in the Pearl River Delta have a relatively low average occupation rate, and the relative advantages of industry development are weakened.
【作者單位】： 中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院;中國(guó)財(cái)政發(fā)展協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金青年科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“大都市圈中心城市產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)的特征、機(jī)理及其區(qū)域影響研究—以京津冀都市圈為例”(41301123) 中國(guó)財(cái)政發(fā)展協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心“中國(guó)城鎮(zhèn)化戰(zhàn)略進(jìn)程中的地方政府行為研究”項(xiàng)目(024050314002/004) 中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)“青年英才”培育支持計(jì)劃“都市圈生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的形成模式:國(guó)際比較與京津冀的路徑選擇”(QYP1612)
【分類號(hào)】：F299.2;F719

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李有恒;武漢城市群:以內(nèi)聯(lián)協(xié)作為推力[J];長(zhǎng)江論壇;2003年01期

2 ;世界五大城市群[J];國(guó)土經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年11期

3 劉伯光;成都不能成為城市群的局外人[J];中共成都市委黨校學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué));2004年01期

4 王彥武;中原城市群幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的探討[J];中州學(xué)刊;2004年05期

5 許叔明;劉靜玉;;中原城市群的形成與發(fā)展分析[J];許昌學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

6 張清平;王運(yùn)寶;;誰(shuí)絆了城市群的腳[J];決策;2006年08期

7 王召東;樊俊鋒;;中外城市群發(fā)展及其對(duì)中原城市群的啟示[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

8 歐陽(yáng)\，

本文編號(hào)：2320549