【摘要】：隨著PPP模式熱潮的到來,2014年以來,國家頒布了大量PPP政策和法規(guī),以促進(jìn)和支持PPP模式發(fā)展。各地政府紛紛開始采用PPP模式提供基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和公共服務(wù),大量的推進(jìn)PPP項目發(fā)展。隨著大規(guī)模的PPP項目落地,由于PPP模式的運用尚有不完善和不成熟之處,PPP模式只是提供基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施產(chǎn)品或服務(wù)的選項之一,政府不能主觀偏好某一采購模式或否定某一模式,應(yīng)當(dāng)有科學(xué)的可量化的依據(jù)來判斷該模式是否物有所值(Value for Money,簡稱VFM)。本研究旨在通過分析PPP項目的風(fēng)險管理過程,深入研究風(fēng)險分擔(dān)對PPP物有所值定量評價的影響,基于風(fēng)險分擔(dān)結(jié)果,構(gòu)建符合中國國情的物有所值定量評價模型,對VFM的計算提供較為科學(xué)合理的計算方法,為政府對PPP項目成本、效果等方面的評估提供參考。首先,通過對PPP模式、PPP風(fēng)險管理、PPP物有所值定量評價的理論基礎(chǔ)和概念進(jìn)行界定,在分析PPP物有所值的影響因素后,發(fā)現(xiàn)風(fēng)險分擔(dān)結(jié)果表現(xiàn)為保留風(fēng)險值和可轉(zhuǎn)移風(fēng)險值對物有所值定量評價有至關(guān)重要的影響。其次,在此基礎(chǔ)上,全面分析了 VFM中的PPP項目風(fēng)險,詳細(xì)分析了風(fēng)險分擔(dān)如何影響物有所值定量評價結(jié)果,對風(fēng)險損失的評估、風(fēng)險概率統(tǒng)計提出科學(xué)的方法進(jìn)行計算,并深入研究了風(fēng)險分擔(dān)和物有所值定量評價之間的關(guān)系,為建立基于風(fēng)險分擔(dān)的PPP項目物有所值評價模型奠定了基礎(chǔ)。接下來,在總結(jié)和分析我國PPP項目的基本運作模式和特點的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合中國的法律法規(guī)具體情況,識別出的VFM評價模型中的主要指標(biāo),如:初始PSC、競爭中立涉及到的因素,形成完整的PPP項目評價模型,提出了適用于中國PPP項目基于風(fēng)險分擔(dān)的PPP物有所值定量評價模型。最后,選擇了 J市經(jīng)開區(qū)的一個PPP項目作為案例項目,通過走訪、查閱、調(diào)研等方式獲取到項目的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),并將新構(gòu)建的基于風(fēng)險分擔(dān)的VFM定量評價模型應(yīng)用到案例項目中,對其進(jìn)行驗證和實踐,為PPP項目的物有所值評價提供可量化依據(jù),為政府對PPP模式的決策選擇提供參考。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of PPP mode upsurge, China has promulgated a large number of PPP policies and regulations since 2014 to promote and support the development of PPP model. Local governments began to use the PPP model to provide infrastructure and public services, a large number of PPP projects to promote the development. As large-scale PPP projects hit the ground, because the use of the PPP model is still imperfect and immature, the PPP model is only one of the options for providing infrastructure products or services. There should be a scientific quantifiable basis for determining whether the model is worth the value for money (Value for Money, for short VFM). The purpose of this study is to analyze the risk management process of PPP projects, and to study the impact of risk sharing on the quantitative evaluation of PPP value for money. Based on the results of risk sharing, a quantitative evaluation model of value for money in accordance with the national conditions of China is constructed. This paper provides a scientific and reasonable calculation method for VFM calculation, and provides a reference for the government to evaluate the cost and effect of PPP project. First of all, by defining the theoretical basis and concept of PPP risk management and quantitative evaluation of PPP value for money, after analyzing the influencing factors of PPP value for money, It is found that the risk sharing results show that the retained risk value and transferable risk value play an important role in the quantitative evaluation of value for money. Secondly, on this basis, the paper analyzes the risk of PPP project in VFM, analyzes in detail how risk sharing affects the quantitative evaluation results of value for money, and puts forward a scientific method to calculate the risk loss and risk probability statistics. The relationship between risk sharing and quantitative evaluation of value for money is deeply studied, which lays a foundation for establishing the model of PPP project value for money evaluation based on risk sharing. Then, on the basis of summarizing and analyzing the basic operating mode and characteristics of PPP projects in China, combined with the specific situation of China's laws and regulations, the main indicators of the VFM evaluation model are identified, such as: the factors involved in the initial PSC, competition. A complete evaluation model of PPP project is formed, and a quantitative evaluation model of PPP value for money based on risk sharing for Chinese PPP project is put forward. Finally, a PPP project in Jingkai District of J City is selected as a case project, and the relevant data of the project are obtained by visiting, consulting, investigating and so on. The new VFM quantitative evaluation model based on risk sharing is applied to the case project, and it is verified and practiced to provide the quantifiable basis for the evaluation of the value for money of the PPP project and the reference for the government to choose the PPP model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F283

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 查京民;林金明;姜敬波;;基于效用理論的建設(shè)-移交項目風(fēng)險分擔(dān)研究[J];城市軌道交通研究;2012年10期

2 高會芹;武藝;李承梅;;PSC指標(biāo)在VFM評價中的應(yīng)用研究[J];價值工程;2012年05期

3 袁競峰;王帆;李啟明;鄧小鵬;;基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項目的VfM評估方法研究及應(yīng)用[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2012年01期

4 孫慧;周穎;范志清;;PPP項目評價中物有所值理論及其在國際上的應(yīng)用[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年11期

5 楊秋波;侯曉文;;PPP模式風(fēng)險分擔(dān)框架的改進(jìn)研究[J];項目管理技術(shù);2008年08期

6 柯永建;王守清;陳炳泉;;基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項目的風(fēng)險分擔(dān)[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年04期

7 楊宇;穆尉鵬;;PPP項目融資風(fēng)險分擔(dān)模型研究[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年02期

8 王雪青;喻剛;邴興國;;PPP項目融資模式風(fēng)險分擔(dān)研究[J];軟科學(xué);2007年06期

9 劉子衛(wèi);;項目風(fēng)險及風(fēng)險分擔(dān)機制探析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2007年18期

10 范小軍;趙一;鐘根元;;基礎(chǔ)項目融資風(fēng)險的分擔(dān)比例研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 何濤;基于PPP模式的交通基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項目風(fēng)險分擔(dān)合理化研究[D];天津大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 張逸倫;新型城鎮(zhèn)化下PPP項目物有所值（VfM）研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2016年

2 張家誠;考慮不確定性的PPP項目物有所值定量評價研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2016年

3 張曉然;城市軌道交通PPP項目的物有所值定量評價研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2016年

4 郭上;我國PPP模式物有所值評價研究[D];財政部財政科學(xué)研究所;2015年

5 伊超;基于資金價值（VFM）的非自償性PPP項目決策機制研究[D];山東建筑大學(xué);2014年

6 李佳嶸;基于我國國情的PSC評價體系研究[D];清華大學(xué);2011年

7 溫陽;基于PPP融資模式的項目風(fēng)險管理研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2009年

8 張文俊;建設(shè)工程項目風(fēng)險管理理論分析與實踐[D];西南交通大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2230415