本文選題：企業(yè)價(jià)值 + 價(jià)值評(píng)估��； 參考：《廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,資產(chǎn)重組、企業(yè)并購(gòu)等資本運(yùn)作活動(dòng)日益增加,對(duì)企業(yè)的利益相關(guān)者來(lái)說(shuō),如何準(zhǔn)確地估計(jì)企業(yè)價(jià)值是急需解決的問(wèn)題。收益現(xiàn)值評(píng)估方法提供了一種解答。收益現(xiàn)值評(píng)估方法,包括股利折現(xiàn)模型、自由現(xiàn)金流折現(xiàn)模型、剩余收益模型。企業(yè)管理者和投資者廣泛使用自由現(xiàn)金流折現(xiàn)模型和股利折現(xiàn)模型評(píng)估企業(yè)價(jià)值,但是其存在諸多缺陷。相對(duì)而言,運(yùn)用傳統(tǒng)剩余收益模型對(duì)房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估,彌補(bǔ)了傳統(tǒng)評(píng)估方法僅能對(duì)有限利用會(huì)計(jì)信息的不足。但是仍存在兩大缺陷:未闡明如何利用企業(yè)歷史財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)預(yù)測(cè)其未來(lái)剩余收益的方法;未解決由于無(wú)限預(yù)期造成的長(zhǎng)期收益預(yù)測(cè)的難題。從而本文引入了杜邦分析體系及P/E和P/B乘數(shù),改進(jìn)了傳統(tǒng)剩余收益模型,推導(dǎo)出新的剩余收益模型公式。然后以萬(wàn)科集團(tuán)為例,運(yùn)用改進(jìn)后的剩余收益模型對(duì)其進(jìn)行價(jià)值評(píng)估。首先,本文文獻(xiàn)調(diào)研了四個(gè)部分,包括基于剩余收益模型的盈余信息價(jià)值相關(guān)性、剩余收益估值模型與其他估值模型的比較分析、剩余收益估值模型對(duì)股票收益預(yù)測(cè)能力、剩余收益估值模型應(yīng)用于具體的企業(yè)估值。其次,介紹了企業(yè)價(jià)值的概念、艾爾文·費(fèi)雪的資本價(jià)值理論、MM理論、權(quán)衡理論。再次,由于傳統(tǒng)剩余收益模型存在實(shí)踐應(yīng)用方面的缺陷,本文引入了杜邦分析體系及P/E和P/B乘數(shù),改進(jìn)傳統(tǒng)剩余收益模型,推導(dǎo)出新的剩余收益模型。這也為接下來(lái)的案例研究做了鋪墊。接著,本文以萬(wàn)科集團(tuán)為例,考慮企業(yè)所面臨的商業(yè)環(huán)境及歷年會(huì)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用改進(jìn)后的剩余收益模型進(jìn)行價(jià)值評(píng)估。本文計(jì)算出企業(yè)在2016年12月31日時(shí)點(diǎn)的股權(quán)價(jià)值,分析內(nèi)在價(jià)值與股價(jià)產(chǎn)生差異化的原因。最后,本文基于對(duì)案例的研究,得出三點(diǎn)結(jié)論。第一,運(yùn)用改進(jìn)后的剩余收益模型測(cè)算出萬(wàn)科集團(tuán)在2016年12月31日時(shí)點(diǎn)的股權(quán)價(jià)值為21,391,212.61萬(wàn)元,計(jì)算結(jié)果比實(shí)際市值低1,294,240.39萬(wàn)元,說(shuō)明萬(wàn)科集團(tuán)當(dāng)年年末的股價(jià)比內(nèi)在價(jià)值高;第二,萬(wàn)科集團(tuán)內(nèi)在價(jià)值對(duì)資產(chǎn)周轉(zhuǎn)率(ATO)、權(quán)益乘數(shù)(EM)、市盈率(P/E)、每股盈余(E)敏感性強(qiáng),而對(duì)于銷售收入(S)、銷售凈利率(MOS)、權(quán)益資本成本(r)敏感性弱。進(jìn)行多因素敏感性分析,可得萬(wàn)科集團(tuán)股權(quán)價(jià)值最樂(lè)觀的估值是27,899,898.95萬(wàn)元,最悲觀的結(jié)果為14,127,438.74萬(wàn)元;第三,剩余收益模型能夠科學(xué)評(píng)定企業(yè)價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的能力。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Chinese economy, capital operation activities such as asset reorganization, enterprise merger and acquisition are increasing day by day. How to estimate the enterprise value accurately is an urgent problem for the stakeholders of the enterprise. The present value method provides an answer. The present value evaluation methods include dividend discount model, free cash flow discount model and residual income model. The discounted free cash flow model and the dividend discount model are widely used by managers and investors to evaluate the enterprise value, but they have many defects. Comparatively speaking, the traditional residual income model is used to evaluate the value of real estate enterprises, which makes up for the deficiency that the traditional evaluation method can only make use of the limited accounting information. However, there are still two defects: how to use the historical financial data of enterprises to predict their future residual income, and not to solve the problem of long-term income prediction caused by infinite expectations. In this paper, we introduce the DuPont analysis system and P / E and P / B multipliers, improve the traditional residual income model, and deduce a new formula of residual income model. Then take Vanke Group as an example, use the improved residual income model to evaluate its value. Firstly, this paper investigates four parts, including the correlation of surplus information value based on residual return model, the comparative analysis between residual income valuation model and other valuation models, and the ability of residual income valuation model to predict stock returns. The residual income valuation model is applied to the specific enterprise valuation. Secondly, it introduces the concept of enterprise value, Alvin Fisher's capital value theory and weighing theory. Thirdly, due to the defects of the traditional residual income model, this paper introduces the DuPont analysis system and P- / E and P- / B multipliers, improves the traditional residual income model, and deduces a new residual income model. This also paved the way for the next case study. Then, taking Vanke Group as an example, considering the business environment faced by enterprises and accounting data over the years, this paper uses the improved residual income model to evaluate the value. This paper calculates the equity value of the enterprise at December 31, 2016, and analyzes the reasons for the difference between the intrinsic value and the stock price. Finally, based on the case study, this paper draws three conclusions. Firstly, using the improved residual income model, the equity value of Vanke Group is estimated to be 213.9121261 billion yuan at December 31, 2016, which is 12.9424039 billion yuan lower than the actual market value, indicating that the stock price of Vanke Group at the end of that year is higher than the intrinsic value. Second, Vanke Group's intrinsic value is highly sensitive to asset turnover, equity multiplier, P / E ratio and earnings per share. Through multifactor sensitivity analysis, the most optimistic valuation of equity value of Vanke Group is 278.9989895 billion yuan, and the most pessimistic result is 141.2743874 billion yuan. Thirdly, the residual income model can scientifically evaluate the ability of enterprise value creation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F299.233.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉娜;黃輝;;自由現(xiàn)金流模型與剩余收益模型比較——以青島海爾公司價(jià)值評(píng)估為例[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2016年16期

2 王清;劉雨露;;基于剩余收益估價(jià)模型的企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估實(shí)證研究[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2014年05期

3 邵希娟;羅鈺;;基于Excel的投資項(xiàng)目多因素敏感性分析的方法研究[J];項(xiàng)目管理技術(shù);2014年02期

4 盧中慧;;基于自由現(xiàn)金流量的公司價(jià)值評(píng)估[J];中國(guó)總會(huì)計(jì)師;2013年12期

5 廖儉;;剩余收益估值模型與自由現(xiàn)金流估值模型比較研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2013年18期

6 饒品貴;岳衡;;剩余收益模型與股票未來(lái)回報(bào)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2012年09期

7 杭省策;張姣姣;;基于剩余收益的企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

8 袁明哲;;企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估方法的比較——基于我國(guó)A股市場(chǎng)的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2009年09期

9 王麗南;;公司價(jià)值評(píng)估:剩余收益模型及其評(píng)價(jià)[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(理財(cái)版);2008年01期

10 于渤,高印朝;銀行股票市場(chǎng)定價(jià)與會(huì)計(jì)信息的價(jià)值相關(guān)性研究[J];金融研究;2005年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬維勝;剩余收益模型及其在中國(guó)的應(yīng)用[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 郝利利;基于剩余收益模型的T公司價(jià)值評(píng)估研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2016年

2 張雪;基于剩余收益模型的W公司價(jià)值評(píng)估研究[D];沈陽(yáng)工業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

3 韓躍峰;基于剩余收益方法的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估的研究[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

4 方煒;剩余收益模型在企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2015年

5 孫明楊;基于剩余收益模型的皖能電力企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

6 趙雷雷;剩余收益模型與股權(quán)價(jià)值投資研究[D];貴州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

7 夏小鴻;剩余收益模型及其在價(jià)值管理中的應(yīng)用研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1999593