本文選題：政治關(guān)聯(lián)　切入點(diǎn)：房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)　出處：《南京理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的騰飛,中國(guó)的民營(yíng)經(jīng)濟(jì)也在不斷的發(fā)展壯大,民營(yíng)企業(yè)家們以引領(lǐng)新一代經(jīng)濟(jì)的決心出現(xiàn)在人們面前。隨著民營(yíng)企業(yè)市場(chǎng)地位的不斷提高,許多優(yōu)秀的企業(yè)家被評(píng)以"中國(guó)十大企業(yè)家"等稱號(hào),但是對(duì)于他們而言,更高的肯定是被人民推舉成為人大代表或政協(xié)委員,適當(dāng)參政。而一些關(guān)鍵人物沒有"代表委員"頭銜加身的民營(yíng)企業(yè),為了保持競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì),也紛紛吸納前政府官員以各種身份加入企業(yè)。此外,還有一些棄官?gòu)纳痰默F(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生,導(dǎo)致政治關(guān)聯(lián)成為一種常態(tài)出現(xiàn)在人們面前。對(duì)于熱門的經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象,常常會(huì)吸引學(xué)術(shù)界的關(guān)注和討論。在這種背景之下,政治關(guān)聯(lián)作為一種非正式替代機(jī)制應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。資源依賴?yán)碚搹恼箨P(guān)系"扶持之手"的角度,很好的解釋了這種現(xiàn)象的背后動(dòng)因:企業(yè)為了尋求生存和發(fā)展所需的必備資源,通過與政府建立政治關(guān)聯(lián),繞開不完善市場(chǎng)中的正式途徑,獲取融資便利、行業(yè)準(zhǔn)入、政府補(bǔ)貼、稅收優(yōu)等方面稀缺資源。然而一些現(xiàn)象也讓我們意識(shí)到政治關(guān)聯(lián)的存在,也會(huì)給企業(yè)在慈善捐贈(zèng)、雇員薪酬成本、創(chuàng)造就業(yè)崗位以解決就業(yè)問題等方面增加相應(yīng)的成本,發(fā)揮著"掠奪之手"的作用。本文基于資源依賴?yán)碚摗ぷ饫碚摵驼纬杀纠碚?并在充分閱讀相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,選擇以企業(yè)高管層(包括董事會(huì)成員和高級(jí)管理人員)是否具有政協(xié)委員、人大代表或政府官員背景為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),判斷企業(yè)是否具有政治關(guān)聯(lián)。在理論推導(dǎo)的基礎(chǔ)上,本文將視角投向整個(gè)房地產(chǎn)民營(yíng)上市企業(yè),希望了解政治關(guān)聯(lián)對(duì)整個(gè)房地產(chǎn)民營(yíng)上市群體的影響。通過選擇2011-2015年滬深上市的房地產(chǎn)民營(yíng)公司為研究樣本,從樣本整體看出:政治關(guān)聯(lián)給公司在政府補(bǔ)貼、債務(wù)融資等方面帶來好處,而在雇員規(guī)模及雇員薪酬成本、慈善捐款方面給公司帶來額外負(fù)擔(dān),最后選擇綜合績(jī)效度量公司財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn),政治關(guān)聯(lián)有利于公司績(jī)效的提升。在對(duì)房地產(chǎn)民營(yíng)上市企業(yè)整個(gè)群體研究的基礎(chǔ)上,從其中選取具有可比性的政治關(guān)聯(lián)YH公司和非政治關(guān)聯(lián)LJ公司進(jìn)行案例對(duì)比研究。希望能從更為微觀的層面,了解政治關(guān)聯(lián)的作用機(jī)制。案例分析過程中,著重關(guān)注政治關(guān)聯(lián)會(huì)給YH公司和LJ公司帶來哪些方面差異,最終如何影響到公司績(jī)效。并就案例對(duì)比得出的結(jié)論與前文總體研究結(jié)論進(jìn)行對(duì)比。發(fā)現(xiàn)除了有關(guān)雇員規(guī)模及雇員薪酬成本的結(jié)果與總體研究的結(jié)果有所出入外,其他結(jié)論具有共性,表明雖然從行業(yè)總體能得出較為一致的結(jié)論,但是政治關(guān)聯(lián)對(duì)具體企業(yè)的作用程度,也會(huì)隨著企業(yè)不同而不同。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy, China's private economy is also growing. Private entrepreneurs appear in front of people with the determination to lead a new generation of economy. Many outstanding entrepreneurs have been appraised as "top ten entrepreneurs in China," but for them, it is more certain that they will be elected by the people as deputies to the National people's Congress or members of the Chinese people's political Consultative Conference. Proper participation in politics. And some key figures who do not have the title of "representative committee" added to the private enterprises, in order to maintain their competitive advantage, have also absorbed former government officials to join the enterprises in various capacities. In addition, In this context, political connections have become the norm. For popular economic phenomena, they often attract the attention and discussion of the academic community. The theory of resource dependence, from the angle of "supporting hand" of the relationship between government and enterprise, well explains the motive behind this phenomenon: enterprises need necessary resources for survival and development. By establishing political connections with the government, bypassing the formal channels in the imperfect market, gaining access to finance, industry access, government subsidies, tax incentives, and so on, some phenomena also make us aware of the existence of political connections. It will also increase the corresponding cost to enterprises in the aspects of charitable donation, employee salary cost, job creation to solve the employment problem, and play the role of "hand of plunder". This paper is based on the theory of resource dependence. Based on the theory of rent-seeking and the theory of political cost, and on the basis of a thorough reading of the relevant literature, the criteria are whether the executives (including board members and senior managers) have the background of CPPCC members, NPC deputies or government officials. On the basis of theoretical derivation, this paper puts the angle of view to the whole private listed real estate enterprises. By selecting the private real estate companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2011-2015 as the research sample, we can see from the sample as a whole: political association gives companies subsidies in the government. Debt financing and other benefits, but in terms of employee size and employee compensation costs, charitable contributions to the company additional burden, the final choice of comprehensive performance measurement of the company's financial performance found, On the basis of the research on the whole group of private listed enterprises in real estate, A comparative case study between YH Company and LJ Company, which has a comparable political connection, is selected. It is hoped that we can understand the mechanism of political association from a more micro level. Focus on the differences between YH and LJ in terms of political connections, Finally, how to affect the performance of the company. The conclusion of the case comparison is compared with the conclusion of the previous overall study. It is found that the results on the size of employees and the salary cost of employees are different from the results of the overall study. Other conclusions have the common character, which indicates that although the conclusion can be drawn from the industry as a whole, the effect of political connection on the specific enterprise will also vary with the enterprise.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630;F299.233.42

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 吳廣慶;;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型視域中的黨建創(chuàng)新——以資源依賴?yán)碚摓橐暯荹J];理論學(xué)習(xí);2011年12期

2 曲宏歌;;從資源依賴?yán)碚撘暯翘接扅h執(zhí)政能力建設(shè)的途徑選擇[J];廈門特區(qū)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

3 周佳琪;;資源依賴視角下的政府與非營(yíng)利組織關(guān)系[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

4 萬方;;公共服務(wù)均等化中政府的“雙重困境”及其修正[J];行政論壇;2014年03期

5 鄧寧華;;“寄居蟹的藝術(shù)”:兩個(gè)體制內(nèi)社會(huì)組織的環(huán)境適應(yīng)策略[J];公共管理研究;2011年00期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 曹靜;草根社會(huì)組織領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人與組織間的資源依賴[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

2 魏振興;省管縣改革進(jìn)程中的市縣競(jìng)合模式比較研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

3 張璐萌;我國(guó)公募基金會(huì)聯(lián)合勸募的運(yùn)作路徑及困境研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2016年

4 吳悅晴;政治關(guān)聯(lián)對(duì)房地產(chǎn)民營(yíng)上市企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)后果影響研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2017年

5 楊名;支持性社會(huì)組織與產(chǎn)業(yè)化公共服務(wù)供給系統(tǒng)[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

6 吳廣深;中國(guó)環(huán)保型非政府組織發(fā)展研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1620466