本文選題：低效用地　切入點(diǎn)：低效用地再開發(fā)　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：城市的建設(shè)發(fā)展離不開土地資源的支撐,但在糧食安全以及生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)等問題的約束下,可供建設(shè)利用的土地資源畢竟有限,增量建設(shè)用地后備資源難以為繼。與此同時(shí),由于早期經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)水平的限制和土地管理工作的缺失等原因,外延式和粗放式的城市發(fā)展道路又使得城市中存有大量利用低效的建設(shè)用地,為此,各地紛紛探索對這部分低效用地的再開發(fā)利用。經(jīng)過幾年的實(shí)踐發(fā)展,這一工作已由試點(diǎn)階段轉(zhuǎn)為深入推進(jìn)階段。然而開展城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā)工作必然要涉及到拆遷補(bǔ)償,雖然幾經(jīng)修改,我國現(xiàn)行的拆遷補(bǔ)償制度依然存在問題,導(dǎo)致被拆遷人抵制拆遷,使得城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā)工作困難重重。所以若要深入推進(jìn)城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā)工作的開展,首先要破解當(dāng)前拆遷困境。城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā),表現(xiàn)為土地使用權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn),實(shí)質(zhì)是再開發(fā)過程中土地增值收益的分配。本文首先通過對城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā)及土地增值收益等概念的界定,對比城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā)前后地價(jià)內(nèi)涵的變化,探討了土地增值收益的形成機(jī)理及歸屬,得出了由級差地租Ⅱ產(chǎn)生的土地增值收益歸政府所有、由市場變化產(chǎn)生的土地增值收益歸被拆遷人所有這一結(jié)論;其次分析了當(dāng)前拆遷補(bǔ)償?shù)默F(xiàn)狀,現(xiàn)行補(bǔ)償在補(bǔ)償方式選擇時(shí)對被拆遷人的意愿考慮不足使得被拆遷人被邊緣化的現(xiàn)象比較嚴(yán)重、集體建設(shè)用地和國有劃撥用地上拆遷補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)過低、政府將土地增值收益占為己有導(dǎo)致被拆遷人承擔(dān)了巨大的市場漲價(jià)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),是當(dāng)前拆遷補(bǔ)償問題的根本所在;最后,論文針對當(dāng)前拆遷補(bǔ)償存在的問題,構(gòu)建了新的城鎮(zhèn)低效用地再開發(fā)拆遷補(bǔ)償模型,界定了拆遷補(bǔ)償范圍,對被拆遷人的原產(chǎn)權(quán)價(jià)值以及在市場變化作用下產(chǎn)生的土地增值收益進(jìn)行測算,并對補(bǔ)償方式進(jìn)行了探討,提出了以原地安置為主、貨幣補(bǔ)償為輔的補(bǔ)償方式。本文還以南京市紅花-機(jī)場片區(qū)拆遷項(xiàng)目為例,運(yùn)用本文所構(gòu)建的拆遷補(bǔ)償模型測算了被拆遷人應(yīng)獲得的拆遷補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并同補(bǔ)償現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行對比分析,驗(yàn)證了本文構(gòu)建的補(bǔ)償模型的科學(xué)性和可行性。
[Abstract]:Urban construction and development can not be separated from the support of land resources. However, under the constraints of food security and ecological environment protection, the land resources available for construction and utilization are after all limited, and the reserve resources for incremental construction land cannot be sustained. Due to the limitation of early economic and technological level and the lack of land management, the extensive and extended urban development road has made a lot of inefficient construction land in the city. For this reason, After several years of practice and development, this work has changed from the pilot stage to the in-depth stage. However, the redevelopment of the inefficient land in cities and towns will inevitably involve demolition and compensation. Although it has been revised several times, there are still problems in the current relocation compensation system in our country, which leads to the people who have been demolished resist the demolition and makes it difficult to redevelop the urban inefficient land. Therefore, if we want to further promote the development of the urban inefficient land redevelopment, First of all, it is necessary to solve the current plight of demolition and relocation. The redevelopment of inefficient urban land is manifested in the circulation of land use rights. In essence, it is the distribution of land value-added income in the process of redevelopment. Firstly, by defining the concepts of urban low-efficiency land redevelopment and land value-added income, this paper compares the changes of land price connotation before and after urban low-efficiency land redevelopment. This paper discusses the formation mechanism and attribution of the land value-added income, and draws the conclusion that the land value-added income generated by the differential land rent 鈪，

本文編號：1614105