本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市工時制選擇:理論探析與方法構(gòu)建　出處：《經(jīng)濟問題》2017年08期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 工時制 工作輔助時間 朝九晚五 朝八晚六 因子分析法

【摘要】：引入“工作輔助時間”概念,從微觀角度、以量化對比的方式闡述了“朝八晚六”與“朝九晚五”兩種工時制的結(jié)構(gòu)與功能差異,繼而從城市整體視角選擇指標,構(gòu)建工時制選擇的理論框架與實證判別方法,并以華北A市為例進行了適用性分析。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):兩種工時制在工作時間碎片化程度、自控時間效用等多個方面存在差異,這些差異導(dǎo)致了兩種工時制適用對象和對工作效率的影響不同,進而影響到城市工時制的選擇;城市規(guī)模、經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平、交通擁堵狀況等是影響工時制選擇的重要因素;“適宜度III”取值范圍為[2,4]時,城市可以考慮引入“朝九晚五”工時制,而當“適宜度III”取值范圍為[0,1]時,宜繼續(xù)維持“朝八晚六”工時制。
[Abstract]:This paper introduces the concept of "work assistant time", and expounds the differences of structure and function of the two kinds of man-hour system from the microcosmic point of view and by means of quantitative comparison between "Korea eight nights six" and "morning nine to five". Then from the perspective of the city as a whole to select indicators, to build the theoretical framework of man-hour system choice and empirical discrimination method. Taking A city in North China as an example, the applicability analysis is carried out. It is found that there are differences in the degree of fragmentation of working time and the effectiveness of self-control time between the two kinds of man-hour systems. These differences lead to two kinds of man-hour system applicable object and the influence on work efficiency are different, and then affect the choice of urban man-hour system; The scale of city, the level of economic development and traffic congestion are the important factors that affect the choice of man-hour system. The range of "suitability III" values is. [2 / 4], cities may consider introducing the "9-to-5" man-hour system, and when the "suitability III" values are in the range of "9 to 5" [It is advisable to continue to maintain the "eight to six" working hours system.
【正文快照】： 2017 年第 8 期 收稿日期: 2017 － 05 － 22 基金項目: 山西省 “ 十三五 ” 規(guī)劃前期研究重大項目( 2015058004 ) 作者簡介: 張 波( 1979— ) ，，男，山西太原人，山西大學(xué)經(jīng)濟與管理學(xué)院副教授，碩士研究生導(dǎo)師，研究方向為勞動經(jīng)濟 學(xué) 。 城市工時

本文編號：1363497