本文關鍵詞：公共服務設施對保障房居民滿意度的影響機理研究　出處：《華僑大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 保障性住房 公共服務設施 居民滿意度 結構方程模型 影響系數(shù)

【摘要】：近年來,廈門市保障性住房建設總量的不斷增加。但配套公共服務設施建設存在問題,導致保障房居民滿意度較低。通過公共服務設施對保障房居民滿意度的影響機理研究,分析公共服務設施配置過程中的關鍵影響因素,為政府建設保障房提供一定的參考。本文對公共服務設施配置影響因素進行分析,選取配置數(shù)量、配置質量、交通便捷性、居民參與度及居民認知感作為自變量。在此基礎上建立公共服務設施對保障房居民滿意度影響的結構方程模型,提出10條路徑假設關系,根據(jù)配置數(shù)量、配置質量等6個潛在變量識別出23個影響因素。其次,對初始模型檢驗和修正,得到最優(yōu)模型。最后,計算各影響因素的總效應,然后排序并依據(jù)標準劃分影響級別。研究結論如下:(1)配套的停車位出現(xiàn)供給不足:保障房居民擁有汽車數(shù)量不斷增加,依靠汽車出行比例占總調(diào)查人群的21.46%。(2)公共服務設施配置質量對保障房居民滿意度的影響最大。配置數(shù)量、配置質量、參與度、居民認知感對滿意度的影響路徑系數(shù)分別為:0.157、0.352、0.227、0.213。(3)參與度、居民認知感對保障房居民滿意度的影響不可忽視。兩者的影響路徑系數(shù)分別為:0.227和0.213,在準則層分別處于第2位和第3位。(4)保障房居民較為關心文娛休閑場所、醫(yī)療機構、商業(yè)設施的交通便捷性和配置質量。使用三類設施的交通便捷性影響系數(shù)分別為:0.308、0.277、0.257,總效應排名為:1、3、5;文娛場所的質量、學校教育質量、醫(yī)療機構的水平影響系數(shù)分別為:0.301、0.259、0.248,總效應排名為:2、4、6。(5)保障房小區(qū)物業(yè)管理不完善。存在設施維護不到位、汽車隨意停放、小區(qū)衛(wèi)生及物業(yè)服務態(tài)度較差等問題,對保障房居民生活影響較大。根據(jù)研究結果,本文提出提升保障房公共服務水平的對策,解決廈門市保障性住房公共服務方面存在的問題。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the total amount of affordable housing construction in Xiamen has been increasing, but there are some problems in the construction of supporting public service facilities. Through the study of the influence mechanism of public service facilities on indemnificatory apartment residents' satisfaction, the key influencing factors in the process of allocation of public service facilities are analyzed. This paper analyzes the influencing factors of the allocation of public service facilities, and selects the allocation quantity, allocation quality, traffic convenience. On the basis of this, the structural equation model of the influence of public service facilities on indemnificatory apartment's satisfaction degree was established, and 10 path hypotheses were put forward, according to the allocation quantity. Six potential variables, such as configuration quality, identify 23 influencing factors. Secondly, the optimal model is obtained by checking and modifying the initial model. Finally, the total effect of each factor is calculated. The study concluded that there was a shortage of parking spaces: the number of cars owned by indemnificatory apartment residents was increasing. The proportion of relying on automobile travel accounted for 21.46% of the total survey population.) the allocation quality of public service facilities has the greatest impact on the satisfaction of indemnificatory apartment residents. The allocation quantity, allocation quality, participation degree. The path coefficient of residents' cognitive perception on satisfaction was 0.157 / 0.352/ 0.2270.213.3respectively) participation. The influence of residents' cognition on indemnificatory apartment's satisfaction can not be ignored. The influence path coefficients of them are: 0.227 and 0.213, respectively. In the standard layer respectively in the 2nd and 3rd place.) indemnificatory apartment residents are more concerned about recreational places, medical institutions. The traffic convenience and configuration quality of commercial facilities. The traffic convenience influence coefficient of using the three kinds of facilities is respectively 0.3080.2770.257 and the total effect rank is 5: 1. The quality of cultural and recreational places, the quality of school education and the level influence coefficient of medical institutions were 0.301 / 0.259 / 0.248, respectively, and the total effect was ranked as: 1 / 2 / 4. 6.5) the property management of indemnificatory apartment district is not perfect. There are some problems such as inadequate maintenance of facilities, random parking of cars, poor health and service attitude of residential areas and so on. According to the research results, this paper puts forward some countermeasures to improve indemnificatory apartment's public service level and solve the problems in the public service of public housing in Xiamen.
【學位授予單位】：華僑大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D630;F299.23

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 ;天津:困于文化糟粕的保障房[J];小康;2009年06期

2 周士君;;原來這保障房還指不定是誰的呢![J];中國老區(qū)建設;2010年03期

3 何勇;;保障房豈是特權房[J];w，

本文編號：1362826