【摘要】：課程考核作為教學(xué)活動(dòng)的一部分,是人才培養(yǎng)的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)之一,對(duì)保障人才培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量至關(guān)重要。以2015年QS大學(xué)排名前100名中的20所國(guó)外一流大學(xué)的636門(mén)課程作為研究樣本,對(duì)國(guó)外大學(xué)本科生與研究生課程的考核方法和不同考核方式所占權(quán)重進(jìn)行了比較研究。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):國(guó)外一流大學(xué)本科生與研究生課程考核呈現(xiàn)考核方法多樣、考核方式靈活、考核方法選擇策略相似、主要考核方法的權(quán)重比較一致、理論與實(shí)踐結(jié)合課的考核更傾向于使用實(shí)踐操作方法、必修課考核更傾向于使用考試方法、不同學(xué)科的課程采用的考核方法存在差異等特點(diǎn);同時(shí),本科生與研究生課程在考試與報(bào)告兩種考核方法的使用比例、考核方式的選擇、基礎(chǔ)課與專(zhuān)業(yè)課使用的考核方法、理論課同理論與實(shí)踐結(jié)合課的考核方法、選修課與必修課的考核方法、不同學(xué)科類(lèi)型課程使用的考核方法等方面存在顯著差異。基于此,提出了發(fā)展和完善我國(guó)高校課程考核方法的對(duì)策建議:豐富高校的課程考核方法,廣泛實(shí)施綜合考核方式;根據(jù)不同教育層次要求合理選擇考核方式方法;根據(jù)課程類(lèi)型靈活選擇考核方法,并科學(xué)合理地分配不同考核方法的權(quán)重。
[Abstract]:As a part of teaching activities, curriculum examination is one of the key links of talent training, which is very important to guarantee the quality of talent training. Taking 636 courses in 20 top universities of foreign countries among the top 100 universities of QS University in 2015 as the research sample, this paper makes a comparative study on the assessment methods and the weight of different assessment methods of undergraduate and graduate courses in foreign universities. It is found that the assessment methods of undergraduate and graduate courses in foreign first-class universities are various, the assessment methods are flexible, the selection strategies of the assessment methods are similar, and the weight of the main assessment methods is the same. The examination of the combination of theory and practice is more inclined to use the practical operation method, the required course examination is more inclined to use the examination method, and there are differences in the assessment methods used in different subjects, at the same time, The proportion of examination and report in undergraduate and graduate courses, the selection of assessment methods, the assessment methods used in basic and professional courses, the assessment methods of combining theory with practice, There are significant differences between the assessment methods of elective courses and compulsory courses, and the assessment methods used in different subject types. Based on this, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for developing and perfecting the assessment methods of Chinese higher education courses: enriching the assessment methods of the courses in colleges and universities, widely implementing the comprehensive assessment methods, reasonably selecting the assessment methods according to the requirements of different educational levels, and improving the curriculum assessment methods of colleges and universities. According to the course type, the examination method is chosen flexibly, and the weights of different assessment methods are assigned scientifically and reasonably.
【作者單位】： 西安交通大學(xué)高等教育研究所/中國(guó)西部高等教育評(píng)估中心;西安交通大學(xué)公共政策與管理學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G642.4;G643

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 談炳發(fā);崔世海;;普通高校專(zhuān)業(yè)課程考核方法改革的探索與實(shí)踐[J];中國(guó)電力教育;2013年19期

2 陳棣沭;韓婧;;中美大學(xué)課程考核方法之比較分析[J];教育與現(xiàn)代化;2010年02期

3 徐曉娟;王鳳花;許蓉艷;;工科專(zhuān)業(yè)課程考核方法改革的實(shí)踐與分析[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

4 劉潔婷;;紅河學(xué)院文科理論課程考核方法研究[J];紅河學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

5 席曉晶;楊雙花;陳華軍;;硅酸鹽工業(yè)分析實(shí)驗(yàn)課程考核方法的改革[J];洛陽(yáng)理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年01期

6 李貴梅;劉潔婷;;紅河學(xué)院課程考核方法的調(diào)查與分析[J];紅河學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

7 李學(xué)偉;;高校服裝工程專(zhuān)業(yè)課程考核方法的創(chuàng)新思考[J];職業(yè)時(shí)空;2012年04期

8 陳天琪;彭芳;王嫣;陳代勇;趙云華;紀(jì)剛;;關(guān)于我院《生理學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)》課程考核方法的改革及實(shí)踐初探[J];貴陽(yáng)中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

9 郝慶升;李銳;聶英;;管理信息系統(tǒng)課程考核方法的探討[J];中國(guó)管理信息化;2010年12期

10 張梅;任波;宋芳芳;雷曉莉;;《中藥制劑分析》課程考核方法改革[J];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2013年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2250012