本文選題：研究生　切入點(diǎn)：招生指標(biāo)分配　出處：《華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：碩士研究生招生指標(biāo)是高校發(fā)展的一個(gè)重要資源,是滿足社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代對(duì)高層次人才需求的重要調(diào)控手段。當(dāng)前高校(院系)在編制研究生招生指標(biāo)分配管理辦法(方案)時(shí)會(huì)把指導(dǎo)教師的數(shù)量和崗位等級(jí)作為主要的指標(biāo)觀測(cè)權(quán)重,同時(shí)會(huì)綜合考評(píng)指導(dǎo)教師的科研平臺(tái)、科研經(jīng)費(fèi)、課題項(xiàng)目和學(xué)術(shù)科研產(chǎn)出,再結(jié)合學(xué)科門類差異性等因素多方面的指標(biāo)觀測(cè)系數(shù)來進(jìn)行定量分配。整體上研究生招生指標(biāo)分配會(huì)考慮學(xué)科門類特點(diǎn)和學(xué)科發(fā)展需求,根據(jù)不同發(fā)展需求進(jìn)行差異性指標(biāo)分配,但這種差異性在沒有科學(xué)合理的招生指標(biāo)分配方案的約束就會(huì)產(chǎn)生招生指標(biāo)分配不公平的問題,這讓高校研究生招生指標(biāo)配置問題面臨著巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。招生指標(biāo)的合理配置是發(fā)展研究生教育的基礎(chǔ),直接影響著高校研究生教育的發(fā)展方向,也會(huì)給高校的發(fā)展帶來更廣闊的拓展力和影響力。為了全面、客觀的了解當(dāng)前教育政策背景下各個(gè)高校學(xué)術(shù)型研究生招生計(jì)劃的現(xiàn)狀,本文采用理論與實(shí)踐相結(jié)合的研究方法。首先,對(duì)國內(nèi)外相關(guān)方面的研究、實(shí)時(shí)政策以及新聞報(bào)道等文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理,再結(jié)合收集到的多所高�，F(xiàn)行研究生招生指標(biāo)分配方案,總結(jié)出對(duì)高校研究生招生指標(biāo)分配方案細(xì)則的清晰認(rèn)識(shí);其次,編制《高校內(nèi)部研究生招生指標(biāo)資源配置研究》的訪談提綱和調(diào)查問卷,結(jié)合對(duì)不同院系類型、不同學(xué)科門類和不同崗位類別的教職工進(jìn)行面對(duì)面的訪談提問,再利用SPSS和AMOS統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件對(duì)316份調(diào)查問卷內(nèi)容進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)處理,對(duì)研究生招生指標(biāo)分配現(xiàn)狀提出的假設(shè)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證;最后,根據(jù)問卷調(diào)查分析結(jié)果對(duì)高校研究生招生指標(biāo)分配面臨的困境和原因進(jìn)行了綜合的分析和歸納,并提出了相關(guān)的意見和對(duì)策。數(shù)據(jù)表明,高校在研究生招生指標(biāo)分配過程中主要根據(jù)導(dǎo)師的數(shù)量和崗位等級(jí)進(jìn)行定量分配,同時(shí)綜合考量指導(dǎo)教師的科研平臺(tái)、科研經(jīng)費(fèi)、課題項(xiàng)目和學(xué)術(shù)科研產(chǎn)出成果,再結(jié)合學(xué)科門類差異性因素等多方面的指標(biāo)觀測(cè)系數(shù)來進(jìn)行定量分配�？傮w上教職工對(duì)高校研究生招生指標(biāo)分配方案持認(rèn)可態(tài)度,但在一些方面還存在著挑戰(zhàn),為此筆者提出了幾點(diǎn)建議:(1)明確招生指標(biāo)分配的院系差異;(2)強(qiáng)化招生指標(biāo)分配的學(xué)科布局;(3)豐富招生指標(biāo)分配的考評(píng)體系;(4)健全招生指標(biāo)分配的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The graduate enrollment index is an important resource for the development of colleges and universities. It is an important means to meet the needs of high level talents in the era of social and economic development and knowledge economy. At present, colleges and universities (departments) will guide the number of teachers when compiling the management method (scheme) for the allocation of graduate enrollment indicators. And the post level as the main indicator observation weights, At the same time, they will comprehensively evaluate and guide teachers' scientific research platforms, research funds, subject items and academic scientific research outputs, Combining with the observation coefficient of many factors, such as the difference of subject category and other factors, the quantitative distribution will be carried out. On the whole, the graduate enrollment index allocation will take into account the characteristics of the subject category and the needs of the development of the subject. According to different development needs, the distribution of different indicators is different, but this difference will lead to the unfair distribution of enrollment indicators without the restriction of scientific and reasonable allocation scheme of enrollment indicators. The reasonable allocation of enrollment index is the basis of the development of graduate education, which directly affects the development direction of graduate education. It will also bring greater expansion and influence to the development of colleges and universities. In order to comprehensively and objectively understand the current situation of enrollment plans for academic graduate students in various colleges and universities under the background of current educational policies, This paper adopts the research method of combining theory and practice. Firstly, it combs the relevant research, real-time policy and news reports, and then combines the current graduate enrollment index allocation scheme of many colleges and universities. It summarizes the clear understanding of the allocation scheme of graduate student enrollment index. Secondly, it compiles the interview outline and questionnaire of "Research on the Resource allocation of Graduate Student enrollment Index in Colleges and Universities", and combines with the different types of colleges and departments. The teaching staff of different disciplines and different posts were interviewed and questioned face to face. Then the data of 316 questionnaires were processed by SPSS and AMOS, and the hypotheses of the distribution of graduate enrollment index were verified. Finally, according to the results of the questionnaire survey, the paper makes a comprehensive analysis and induction of the difficulties and reasons faced by the allocation of graduate enrollment indicators in colleges and universities, and puts forward some relevant opinions and countermeasures. In the process of allocation of graduate enrollment indicators, colleges and universities are mainly assigned quantitatively according to the number of tutors and their post grades, and at the same time, they comprehensively consider the scientific research platform, research funds, project items and academic scientific research output of the teachers. In general, faculty members hold an approbatory attitude to the allocation scheme of graduate student enrollment index, but there are still challenges in some aspects. For this reason, the author puts forward several suggestions: 1) making clear the difference between departments and colleges in the allocation of enrollment index. (2) strengthening the subject layout of the assignment of enrollment index and enriching the examination and evaluation system of the allocation of enrollment index; 4) perfecting the competitive mechanism of the allocation of enrollment index.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G643

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊秀芹;李茜;;研究生收費(fèi)政策變遷的過程與實(shí)質(zhì)[J];研究生教育研究;2016年05期

2 楊艷飛;;我國高校招生計(jì)劃分配制的法理透視與制度反思——基于教育平等的考量[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年07期

3 汪紅梅;;工科研究生綜合考評(píng)體系研究[J];科教文匯(上旬刊);2016年03期

4 王春暉;;推動(dòng)高校優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科建設(shè) 促進(jìn)辦學(xué)水平提升[J];中國高等教育;2015年12期

5 肖冬梅;吳秀文;劉芳;;教育資源配置視角下的慕課現(xiàn)象解構(gòu)[J];圖書館;2015年05期

6 喬天一;鄧溪瑤;于曉磊;陳虎;盧曉東;黃曉婷;;以“基尼系數(shù)”衡量部屬高校分省招生指標(biāo)的公平性[J];中國高教研究;2014年10期

7 陳啟杰;朱君萍;;研究生教育質(zhì)量及其多元性特征探析[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2014年05期

8 侯延斌;陳地龍;陳怡婷;謝鵬;;學(xué)術(shù)型臨床醫(yī)學(xué)研究生質(zhì)量保障體系的構(gòu)建[J];研究生教育研究;2014年04期

9 孫友蓮;魏少華;黃鳳良;;高校學(xué)術(shù)型碩士研究生招生計(jì)劃動(dòng)態(tài)調(diào)整的方法研究——以南京師范大學(xué)為例[J];學(xué)位與研究生教育;2014年06期

10 呂昆;;碩士研究生招生指標(biāo)分配體系改革研究[J];中國電子教育;2014年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 屈文建;中國高等教育資源配置的均衡性研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

2 岳建軍;高等學(xué)校教育資源共享問題研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2012年

3 羅敏;基于資源配置的研究生招生機(jī)制研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孟憲辰;我校研究生培養(yǎng)認(rèn)知調(diào)查分析[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2015年

2 薛敏;全面收費(fèi)背景下碩士研究生的激勵(lì)研究[D];廣西師范學(xué)院;2014年

3 蘇真子;試論我國高校人才使用如何達(dá)到相對(duì)帕累托最優(yōu)狀態(tài)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

4 張國斌;包頭市昆都侖區(qū)義務(wù)教育均衡發(fā)展問題和對(duì)策[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2013年

5 李煜;中國C9高校學(xué)科布局及跨學(xué)科科研生產(chǎn)力比較研究[D];南京大學(xué);2013年

6 倪曉娜;高等教育資源配置存在的問題及對(duì)策研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

7 牛春艷;中美碩士研究生招生制度比較研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

8 黃美琳;管理的配置職能及其在教育中的應(yīng)用研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2009年

9 呂丹楓;戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃理論指導(dǎo)下的理工科研究生招生資源配置新模式初探[D];浙江大學(xué);2009年

10 索昭昭;研究生招生考試制度的國際比較與借鑒[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1678306