教育改革市場趨向中的政府責任研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-28 19:19
【摘要】：政府在國民教育中的公共責任是由教育的內在特性及其效益作用和公眾對政府責任的確認所決定的，而非教育服務的公共產(chǎn)品性質。本文從分析政府在教育產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中的公共責任和教育服務的準公共產(chǎn)品屬性入手，確認政府在發(fā)展教育中承擔公共責任的理論依據(jù)所在，確認教育改革市場趨向的邏輯起點及其可能性，進而認為在教育改革市場趨向中政府應承擔起發(fā)展教育事業(yè)，維護教育機會平等，保證教育權利實現(xiàn)的責任；同時還要以社會公共利益代言人的角色，充分利用市場和市場機制，提高教育產(chǎn)品服務的質量和效益。但由于我國教育改革市場趨向的原動力是減輕財政壓力和應對教育高需求，改革措施往往是這兩種巨大壓力的誘致性產(chǎn)物，對教育市場化的內在機理缺少充分的討論和把握，對教育市場化改革進程缺少宏觀設計，對教育市場化進程中保障教育平等缺少制度性安排，在教育改革市場趨向中，注重社會資金的引入及收費和價格機制的利用，而未著力于教育服務消費者自主權和教育服務生產(chǎn)者自主權的實現(xiàn)，以及教育市場競爭機制的培育和確立，，雖通過各種改革措施擴大了教育規(guī)模提高了經(jīng)濟效益，窮國辦起了大教育，但導致公立學校濫用壟斷權力，民辦學校欺詐性辦學及后續(xù)發(fā)展乏力，以及由亂收費高學費引致的教育公平問題日益突出，教育市場化競爭機制尚未建立，政府教育公共責任已面臨危機。這些問題的產(chǎn)生是與教育市場化改革的舉措相伴而生的，要消除其不利影響，就必須充分認知和把握政府在教育市場化改革中的定位和責任，認清教育市場化改革的著力點和發(fā)展方向，充分重視教育市場化競爭機制的建立和培育，充分重視教育平等制度的設計和落實，進一步利用競爭機制發(fā)展壯大教育產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)模，提高教育服務的質量和效益。
[Abstract]:The public responsibility of the government in the national education is determined by the inherent characteristics of education and its benefit function and the confirmation of the public responsibility of the government, rather than the nature of the public goods of the educational service. Starting with the analysis of the public responsibility of the government in the development of the education industry and the quasi-public product attribute of the educational service, this paper confirms the theoretical basis for the government to undertake the public responsibility in the development of education. The logical starting point and possibility of educational reform market trend are confirmed, and the government should assume the responsibility of developing education cause, maintaining equal educational opportunity and guaranteeing the realization of educational right. At the same time, we should make full use of the market and market mechanism to improve the quality and benefit of educational products and services. However, the original motive force of the market trend of education reform in our country is to reduce the financial pressure and to deal with the high demand of education. The reform measures are often the inductive products of these two kinds of great pressures, and the inherent mechanism of the education marketization is not fully discussed and grasped. There is a lack of macro design in the process of educational marketization reform, a lack of institutional arrangements to guarantee education equality in the process of educational marketization, and a focus on the introduction of social funds and the utilization of fee and price mechanisms in the educational reform market trend. But not focusing on the realization of consumer autonomy and producer autonomy of educational services, and the cultivation and establishment of competitive mechanism in the education market, although the scale of education has been expanded through various reform measures and the economic benefits have been improved. In poor countries, great education has been set up, but it has led to abuse of monopoly power in public schools, fraudulent running of private schools and lack of subsequent development, and the growing problem of educational fairness caused by excessive fees and high tuition fees. The market-oriented competition mechanism of education has not yet been established. The public responsibility of government education has been faced with crisis. The emergence of these problems is accompanied by the educational market-oriented reform. In order to eliminate its adverse effects, it is necessary to fully understand and grasp the position and responsibility of the government in the educational market-oriented reform. We should have a clear understanding of the focus and development direction of the market-oriented education reform, attach great importance to the establishment and cultivation of the educational market-oriented competitive mechanism, and pay full attention to the design and implementation of the educational equality system, and further utilize the competitive mechanism to develop and expand the scale of the educational industry. Improve the quality and efficiency of educational services.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：G46
本文編號：2210361
[Abstract]:The public responsibility of the government in the national education is determined by the inherent characteristics of education and its benefit function and the confirmation of the public responsibility of the government, rather than the nature of the public goods of the educational service. Starting with the analysis of the public responsibility of the government in the development of the education industry and the quasi-public product attribute of the educational service, this paper confirms the theoretical basis for the government to undertake the public responsibility in the development of education. The logical starting point and possibility of educational reform market trend are confirmed, and the government should assume the responsibility of developing education cause, maintaining equal educational opportunity and guaranteeing the realization of educational right. At the same time, we should make full use of the market and market mechanism to improve the quality and benefit of educational products and services. However, the original motive force of the market trend of education reform in our country is to reduce the financial pressure and to deal with the high demand of education. The reform measures are often the inductive products of these two kinds of great pressures, and the inherent mechanism of the education marketization is not fully discussed and grasped. There is a lack of macro design in the process of educational marketization reform, a lack of institutional arrangements to guarantee education equality in the process of educational marketization, and a focus on the introduction of social funds and the utilization of fee and price mechanisms in the educational reform market trend. But not focusing on the realization of consumer autonomy and producer autonomy of educational services, and the cultivation and establishment of competitive mechanism in the education market, although the scale of education has been expanded through various reform measures and the economic benefits have been improved. In poor countries, great education has been set up, but it has led to abuse of monopoly power in public schools, fraudulent running of private schools and lack of subsequent development, and the growing problem of educational fairness caused by excessive fees and high tuition fees. The market-oriented competition mechanism of education has not yet been established. The public responsibility of government education has been faced with crisis. The emergence of these problems is accompanied by the educational market-oriented reform. In order to eliminate its adverse effects, it is necessary to fully understand and grasp the position and responsibility of the government in the educational market-oriented reform. We should have a clear understanding of the focus and development direction of the market-oriented education reform, attach great importance to the establishment and cultivation of the educational market-oriented competitive mechanism, and pay full attention to the design and implementation of the educational equality system, and further utilize the competitive mechanism to develop and expand the scale of the educational industry. Improve the quality and efficiency of educational services.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：G46
【引證文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 馬永軍;縣域內義務教育階段教師資源配置均衡化問題研究[D];西南大學;2010年
2 孔祥雯;少兒英語培訓市場的政府監(jiān)管[D];中南大學;2010年
3 信曉婷;河北省X縣學前教育事業(yè)管理的敘事研究[D];西北師范大學;2012年
本文編號：2210361
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/xuexiaoguanli/2210361.html
