天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 教育論文 > 學生管理論文 >

師范生的心理素質(zhì)、學校適應及其關(guān)系研究

發(fā)布時間:2018-10-31 20:54
【摘要】:教育的發(fā)展和進步有賴于大批高素質(zhì)的教師的貢獻。提高教師的素質(zhì),首先應該從師范生的培養(yǎng)做起,而師范生心理素質(zhì)是核心問題,學校適應是其外在表現(xiàn)。本研究目的在與了解師范生心理素質(zhì)以及學校適應的現(xiàn)狀,并了解師范生心理素質(zhì)對其學校適應的預測作用,為促進師范生的學校適應提供一些理論依據(jù)。 本研究在山東師范大學、河北師范大學兩所高校的在校師范生中選取了有效被試559名,本研究所用的研究工具有兩個問卷:師范生心理素質(zhì)評價量表和大學生適應性量表(CSAI)。 通過探討師范生的心理素質(zhì)和學校適應的人口統(tǒng)計學特點及二者之間的關(guān)系。主要得出的結(jié)論如下: 1、師范生的心理素質(zhì)總體處于中等水平,自我監(jiān)控維度得分最高,客觀性維度得分最低;學校適應總體處于中等偏上水平,生活自理適應性的得分最高,環(huán)境總體認同得分最低。 2、師范生的心理素質(zhì)九個維度中,責任心、創(chuàng)造性和非權(quán)勢性在性別上有顯著差異;教育效能感在專業(yè)上有顯著差異;創(chuàng)造性在城鄉(xiāng)上有顯著差異。學校適應七個維度中,男生除了職業(yè)適應性的得分高于女生外,其他六個維度的得分均低于女生;文科生七個維度的得分均高于理科生,且職業(yè)適應性在專業(yè)上有顯著差異;農(nóng)村學生除了生活自理適應性的得分高于城鎮(zhèn)學生外,其他六個維度的得分均低于城鎮(zhèn)學生,且人際適應性、角色適應性在城鄉(xiāng)上有顯著差異;大二學生在各維度幾乎都得分最低,且與其他三個年級的學生在環(huán)境總體認同上有顯著差異。 3、師范生的心理素質(zhì)及各維度(除責任心外)和學校適應及各維度之間均成顯著正相關(guān)。 4、師范生心理素質(zhì)中的成就動機、有恒性、自我監(jiān)控、非權(quán)勢性和角色認同五個維度對學校適應總體情況有正向預測作用;心理素質(zhì)的成就動機、有恒性、自我監(jiān)控、非權(quán)勢性和角色認同五個維度對學習適應性有正向預測作用;有恒性、成就動機、自我監(jiān)控、非權(quán)勢性、角色認同和客觀性六個維度對人際適應性有正向預測作用;成就動機、教育效能感、有恒性、創(chuàng)造性四個維度對角色適應性有正向預測作用;成就動機、角色認同、有恒性和自我監(jiān)控四個維度對職業(yè)適應性有正向預測作用;教育效能感、成就動機、非權(quán)勢性和有恒性四個維度對生活自理適應性有正向預測作用;角色認同、客觀性、有恒性三個維度對環(huán)境的總體認同有正向預測作用;有恒性、客觀性、成就動機和角色認同四個維度對身心癥狀表現(xiàn)有正向預測作用。在所有預測中,成就動機的預測力最強,在八項預測中出現(xiàn)七次,其中四次預測力最強,兩次預測力第二;其次是有恒性,在八項預測中均出現(xiàn),概率為百分之百,可見有恒性這一品質(zhì)在師范生適應中的重要意義;角色認同的預測力居于第三位。
[Abstract]:The development and progress of education depends on the contribution of a large number of high-quality teachers. To improve teachers' quality, we should start with the cultivation of normal students, and the psychological quality of normal school students is the core problem, and school adaptation is its external manifestation. The purpose of this study is to understand the psychological quality of normal school students and the current situation of school adaptation, and to understand the predictive effect of normal college students' psychological quality on their school adaptation, so as to provide some theoretical basis for promoting the school adaptation of normal school students. In this study, 559 effective subjects were selected from two universities of Shandong normal University and Hebei normal University. The research tools used in this study are two questionnaires: normal college students' psychological quality evaluation scale and college students' adaptability scale (CSAI). This paper discusses the psychological quality of normal school students, the demographic characteristics of school adaptation and the relationship between them. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. The psychological quality of normal college students is in the middle level, the score of self-monitoring dimension is the highest, and the score of objectivity dimension is the lowest; The school adaptation is at the middle level, the living adaptability is the highest, and the environmental identity is the lowest. (2) among the nine dimensions of psychological quality of normal school students, there are significant differences in responsibility, creativity and non-power between the sexes, the sense of educational efficacy in specialty, and the difference in creativity in urban and rural areas. In the seven dimensions of school adaptation, the scores of the other six dimensions are all lower than that of the female students, except the scores of the male students' occupational adaptability are higher than that of the female students, and the scores of the seven dimensions of liberal arts students are all higher than those of the students of science, and there are significant differences in the professional adaptability between them. The scores of the other six dimensions of rural students are lower than those of urban students except that of urban students, and there are significant differences in interpersonal adaptability and role adaptability between urban and rural areas. Sophomore students had the lowest scores in almost all dimensions, and there were significant differences with the other three grades in the overall environmental identity. 3. There was a significant positive correlation between the psychological quality of normal school students and each dimension (except sense of responsibility), school adaptation and each dimension. 4. The five dimensions of achievement motivation, consistency, self-monitoring, non-power and role identity in the psychological quality of normal school students can positively predict the school's adaptation to the overall situation; The five dimensions of achievement motivation, consistency, self-monitoring, non-power and role identity of psychological quality have positive predictive effect on learning adaptability. The six dimensions of consistency, achievement motivation, self-monitoring, non-power, role identity and objectivity have positive predictive effects on interpersonal adaptability. Achievement motivation, educational efficacy, persistence and creativity have positive predictive effects on role adaptability, achievement motivation, role identity, consistency and self-monitoring have positive predictive effects on career adaptability. The four dimensions of educational efficacy, achievement motivation, non-power and permanence can positively predict the adaptability of life, the three dimensions of role identity, objectivity and consistency have positive predictive effects on the overall identity of the environment. The four dimensions of consistency, objectivity, achievement motivation and role identity can positively predict the performance of physical and mental symptoms. Among all the predictions, achievement motivation had the strongest predictive power, and appeared seven times in the eight forecasts, four of which was the strongest, and the second was twice. The second is the existence of consistency, which appears in all the eight predictions, and the probability is 100%, which shows that the quality of consistency is of great significance in the adaptation of normal school students, and the predictive power of role identity is in the third place.
【學位授予單位】:山東師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:B844.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陶沙;從生命全程發(fā)展觀論大學生入學適應[J];北京師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2000年02期

2 申繼亮,,辛濤;論教師教學的監(jiān)控能力[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);1995年01期

3 孔維民;;適應的分型與適應能力的培養(yǎng)[J];淮北煤師院學報(社會科學版);1991年03期

4 趙富才;大學新生心理適應問題研究[J];健康心理學雜志;1999年04期

5 王學臣,牛慶忠;大學畢業(yè)生社會適應狀況調(diào)查[J];健康心理學雜志;2001年04期

6 趙銘錫;學生心理適應不良者人格特征分析[J];健康心理學雜志;2001年05期

7 岳曉東;論大學生心理素質(zhì)之認識與培養(yǎng)[J];教育導刊;2000年05期

8 肖漢仕;關(guān)于心理素質(zhì)教育體系的探討[J];教育科學;1996年03期

9 許燕;面向21世紀高師學生心理素質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)的研究[J];教育研究;1999年10期

10 樊富珉,王冰;優(yōu)化大學生心理素質(zhì) 培養(yǎng)全面發(fā)展的人才——大學生心理素質(zhì)優(yōu)化的實驗研究[J];清華大學教育研究;1999年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 丁云霞;大學生心理素質(zhì)量表的編制的初步研究[D];華南師范大學;2003年

2 盧謝峰;大學生適應性量表的編制與標準化[D];華中師范大學;2003年

3 羅品超;大學生心理素質(zhì)構(gòu)成因素及其測量工具的研究[D];華南師范大學;2005年

4 楊玉芹;云南少數(shù)民族大學生學校適應問卷的編制及相關(guān)問題研究[D];西南大學;2008年



本文編號:2303514

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/xueshengguanli/2303514.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶9e037***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com