【摘要】：選取中超、日本J1聯(lián)賽和歐洲5大聯(lián)賽1994-2015年共22個(gè)賽季的比賽結(jié)果,按照時(shí)間順序?qū)⑵浞譃?個(gè)階段(每11個(gè)賽季為一個(gè)階段),提出與構(gòu)建了競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡熵和成績(jī)差距性指數(shù),并對(duì)職業(yè)足球聯(lián)賽的均衡性與差距性問題進(jìn)行了分析,研究結(jié)果顯示:1)中超和日本J1聯(lián)賽的整體競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡性都偏低,但日本J1聯(lián)賽的主、客場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡熵則較高,而中超的主、客場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡熵明顯低于其它各個(gè)聯(lián)賽;2)英超與西甲在1994-2004賽季中有較高的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡性,但自2005賽季開始,卻有十分明顯的下降;3)德甲聯(lián)賽的整體競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡性一般,但主、客場(chǎng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡熵值較高,客場(chǎng)比賽各支球隊(duì)的成績(jī)差距在2005-2015賽季有較大幅度的減小。意甲聯(lián)賽整體和主、客場(chǎng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡性都為一般,客場(chǎng)各支球隊(duì)的成績(jī)差距都比較大,但在2005-2015賽季則有所減小;4)法甲聯(lián)賽有較高的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡性,其各支球隊(duì)的成績(jī)差距比較小。
[Abstract]:The results of 22 seasons of China Super League, Japanese J1 League and European 5 Major League matches from 1994 to 2015 are divided into two stages according to the chronological order (one stage per 11 seasons). The competitive equilibrium entropy and performance difference index are put forward and constructed, and the equilibrium and difference between professional football league matches are analyzed. the results show that: 1) the overall competitive equilibrium between China Super League and Japanese J1 League is on the low side. However, the competition equilibrium entropy of the Japanese J1 league is higher than that of the Chinese Super League, while the away competition equilibrium entropy of the Chinese Super League is obviously lower than that of the other leagues. 2) the Premiership and La Liga have a high competitive equilibrium in 1994 / 2004, but since the beginning of 2005 season, there has been a very obvious decline; 3) the overall competitive equilibrium of Bundesliga is general, but the entropy of competition equilibrium between home and away games is high, and the performance gap of each team in the away game has been greatly reduced in 2005 / 2015. The competition balance of Serie A as a whole and the main and away games is general, the performance gap of the away teams is relatively large, but it decreases in the 2005 / 2015 season. 4) the French League A has a high competitive equilibrium, and the performance gap of each team is relatively small.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)教育學(xué)院體育學(xué)系;
【基金】：浙江大學(xué)基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金項(xiàng)目(BSF-002-001)
【分類號(hào)】：G843

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李先柏;壟斷競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡──從短期走向長(zhǎng)期[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期

2 王志華;雙重價(jià)格機(jī)制下經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)的運(yùn)行研究[J];中國管理科學(xué);1996年03期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 周興維;哪里是中國企業(yè)的“藍(lán)海”[N];上海證券報(bào);2006年

2 林景新;防范危機(jī)須注重三方面平衡[N];中國證券報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳德華;完全信息下壟斷市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2010年

2 吳輝球;基于競(jìng)賽模型的外包服務(wù)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫明輝;純交換經(jīng)濟(jì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡與交易成本研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2008年

2 馬嘯;體育聯(lián)賽競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡評(píng)價(jià)方法的理論與實(shí)證研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2012年

3 李成;中職籃競(jìng)爭(zhēng)均衡研究[D];武漢體育學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2520842