基于Preker-Harding模型的大型公共體育場(chǎng)館事業(yè)單位體制改革模式評(píng)價(jià)
[Abstract]:The typical case investigation method, expert interview method and Preker-Harding model theory are used to evaluate the management system reform mode of large public stadiums and gymnasiums in China. The results show that the reform mode of venue management system in public institutions in China can be summarized as the internal reform mode, the enterprise management reform mode, the enterprise and enterprise merger reform mode, the BCO reform mode and the "event to enterprise" reform mode. There are six modes of entrustment management in public institutions. Combined with Preker-Harding model, eight latitudes of evaluation are designed. It is considered that the reform mode within the system, the reform mode of enterprise management in public institutions belongs to the mode of independent operation of institutions, the mode of enterprise and enterprise reform, and the mode of BCO reform belongs to the mode of legalization of management institutions. The reform mode of "transforming affairs into enterprises" belongs to the mode of enterprise legal person, and the mode of entrustment management of public institutions belongs to the mode of entrustment legalization. The functions of the four models are different in terms of government as owner and regulator. In the future, the goal and train of thought of the reform of enterprise stadiums and gymnasiums in our country is classified reform, the short-term goal of the reform direction is to adopt the enterprise management mode of public institutions, and the medium-term development goal is to draw lessons from the BCO management reform mode. The long-term development goal is to improve the entrustment management model.
【作者單位】: 山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)體育學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目(15BTY047)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:G818
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李明;我國(guó)公共體育場(chǎng)館的資產(chǎn)性質(zhì)及其改革[J];天津體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期
2 張巖;我國(guó)公共體育場(chǎng)館性質(zhì)辨析[J];體育與科學(xué);2004年02期
3 錢(qián)偉良,陳斌;浙江省公共體育場(chǎng)館經(jīng)營(yíng)管理現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策[J];安徽體育科技;2004年03期
4 郭惠平;公共體育場(chǎng)館經(jīng)營(yíng)管理問(wèn)題的診斷及對(duì)策[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報(bào);2005年12期
5 謝萍萍;陸亨伯;;公共體育場(chǎng)館的高成本運(yùn)作及其民營(yíng)化改革[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
6 謝萍萍;陸亨伯;;公共體育場(chǎng)館的高成本運(yùn)作及其民營(yíng)化改革[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報(bào);2006年04期
7 李梁華;;對(duì)我國(guó)公共體育場(chǎng)館經(jīng)營(yíng)現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策的研究[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年04期
8 劉麗萍;趙世昌;;論公共體育場(chǎng)館的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理[J];體育世界;2006年12期
9 徐文強(qiáng);陳元欣;張洪武;王健;;我國(guó)公共體育場(chǎng)館經(jīng)營(yíng)現(xiàn)狀及管理體制改革研究[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
10 陸亨伯;陸方U,
本文編號(hào):2495816
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2495816.html