【摘要】：無(wú)論在賽前還是賽后,運(yùn)動(dòng)員的拉伸行為都隨處可見(jiàn)。在多種拉伸方式中,靜態(tài)拉伸是其中一種較為常見(jiàn)的拉伸方式。一方面,先前對(duì)靜態(tài)拉伸的研究,主要集中在其對(duì)運(yùn)動(dòng)員身體指標(biāo)上的影響上,結(jié)果各有不同。另一方面,先前的實(shí)驗(yàn)室測(cè)試均采用連續(xù)測(cè)試的方法來(lái)探究靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)指標(biāo)的影響,并沒(méi)有考慮到測(cè)試本身也是一種刺激,也許會(huì)對(duì)結(jié)果產(chǎn)生干擾。目的:本研究旨在通過(guò)中等強(qiáng)度刺激對(duì)受試者的下肢進(jìn)行靜態(tài)拉伸,并測(cè)試爆發(fā)力、最大力量和柔韌性等指標(biāo),試圖探求連續(xù)測(cè)試與分開(kāi)測(cè)試之間是否存在差異及原因。方法:本實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)北京體育大學(xué)13名術(shù)科生進(jìn)行中等強(qiáng)度的下肢靜態(tài)拉伸,并采用SPSS23.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件對(duì)連續(xù)測(cè)試和分開(kāi)測(cè)試兩種測(cè)試方法下受試者的下肢最大力量、柔韌性和爆發(fā)力進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。結(jié)果:1.對(duì)下肢最大力量測(cè)試得出,不同測(cè)試方案和不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)之間顯著性0.156(P0.05),不同測(cè)試方案下5min、10min、15min顯著性分別為0.194(P0.05)、0.007(P0.05)和0.006(P0.05)。2.對(duì)下肢柔韌性測(cè)試得出,不同測(cè)試方案和不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)之間顯著性0.140(P0.05),不同測(cè)試方案下5min、10min、15min顯著性分別為0.007(P0.05)、0.027(P0.05)和0.018(P0.05)。3.對(duì)下肢爆發(fā)力測(cè)試得出,不同測(cè)試方案和不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)之間顯著性0.901(P0.05),不同測(cè)試方案下5min、10min、15min顯著性分別為0.370(P0.05)、0.572(P0.05)和0.453(P0.05)。結(jié)論:1.研究靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)下肢最大力量測(cè)試的影響時(shí),5分鐘內(nèi),最大力量值不受前測(cè)測(cè)試影響;10-15分鐘內(nèi),前測(cè)測(cè)試本身對(duì)最大力量值有顯著影響。2.研究靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)下肢柔韌性測(cè)試的影響時(shí),5分鐘內(nèi),10分鐘內(nèi)和15分鐘內(nèi),前測(cè)測(cè)試本身對(duì)柔韌性值均有顯著影響。3.研究靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)下肢爆發(fā)力測(cè)試影響時(shí),5分鐘內(nèi),10分鐘內(nèi)和15分鐘內(nèi),前測(cè)測(cè)試本身對(duì)爆發(fā)力值均無(wú)顯著影響。
[Abstract]:Both before and after the competition, the stretching behavior of athletes can be seen everywhere. Static stretching is one of the most common tensile methods. On the one hand, the previous research on static stretching mainly focused on its influence on athletes' physical indexes, and the results were different. On the other hand, previous laboratory tests have used continuous testing to explore the effect of static tension on the index, without considering that the test itself is also a stimulus, which may interfere with the results. Objective: the purpose of this study was to test the explosive force, maximum strength and flexibility of the lower extremities of the subjects through moderate intensity stimulation, and to explore whether there was any difference between the continuous test and the separate test. Methods: in this experiment, 13 technical students of Beijing University of physical Education were subjected to medium strength static stretching of lower extremities, and the maximum strength of lower extremities was tested continuously and separately by SPSS23.0 statistical software. Flexibility and explosive force are statistically analyzed. Result: 1. The maximum strength test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.156, P 0.05). At 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.194 (P 0.05). 0.007 (P 0.05) and 0.006 (P 0.05). 2. The flexibility test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.140, P 0.05). At 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.007 (P 0.05). 0.027 (P 0.05) and 0.018 (P 0.05). 3. The explosive power test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.901) (P 0.05). Under different test schemes for 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.370 (P 0.05). 0.572 (P 0.05) and 0.453 (P 0.05). Conclusion: 1. When studying the effect of static tension on the maximum strength test of lower extremity, the maximum strength value was not affected by the pre-test within 5 minutes, and within 10 minutes, the pre-test itself had a significant effect on the maximum strength value. 2. When studying the effect of static tension on the flexibility test of lower extremity, within 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes, the pre-test itself had a significant effect on the flexibility value. 3. In order to study the effect of static tension on the explosive force of lower extremity, the pre-test itself had no significant effect on the explosive force within 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G808.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 ellie;崔志強(qiáng);;靜態(tài)拉伸讓身體更柔韌[J];體育博覽;2010年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 傅志強(qiáng);;MTS SINTECH 65/G靜態(tài)拉伸系統(tǒng)CREATOR PRIVILEGE的應(yīng)用研究[A];第五屆全國(guó)MTS材料試驗(yàn)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2001年

2 黃文;徐偉;夏源明;;SiC纖維動(dòng)靜態(tài)拉伸力學(xué)性能的試驗(yàn)研究[A];復(fù)合材料：生命、環(huán)境與高技術(shù)——第十二屆全國(guó)復(fù)合材料學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2002年

3 楊柳;王霞;楊京蕓;管常東;賈瀟凌;;靜態(tài)拉伸下調(diào)A7r5細(xì)胞IKCa1通道蛋白的表達(dá)[A];第十屆全國(guó)生物力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨第十二屆全國(guó)生物流變學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張洋;股后肌群靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)女子急停跳躍高度及膝關(guān)節(jié)負(fù)荷的急性影響[D];寧波大學(xué);2015年

2 張杰;股后肌群靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)女性運(yùn)動(dòng)員側(cè)切動(dòng)作的生物力學(xué)即刻影響[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2015年

3 樊哲;靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)關(guān)節(jié)靈活性、肌力以及表面肌電特征的影響[D];沈陽(yáng)體育學(xué)院;2014年

4 蔡健;靜態(tài)拉伸后不同時(shí)間間隔對(duì)下肢力量和柔韌性的影響[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

5 陳效;單軸拉伸裝置中硅膠膜的應(yīng)力分析及靜態(tài)拉伸對(duì)ECV-304細(xì)胞形態(tài)的影響[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2483208