【摘要】：本文以當(dāng)今世界優(yōu)秀女子兩面反膠進(jìn)攻打法選手與不同性能球拍進(jìn)攻打法選手丁寧、朱雨玲、福原愛、木子為研究對象,運用觀察統(tǒng)計法與對比分析法,對32場共172局比賽的技戰(zhàn)術(shù)使用情況進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計分析。通過對兩種不同打法運動員之間技戰(zhàn)術(shù)得失分特征的比較分析,得到以下結(jié)論:1、兩種不同打法選手三段使用率沒有明顯差別,兩面反膠選手發(fā)搶段與相持段得分率較高,不同性能球拍選手接搶段得分率較高。不同性能球拍選手上手使用率明顯高于兩面反膠選手,尤其在接發(fā)球輪,但得分率低于兩面反膠選手。兩種不同打法選手均以反手上手為主,正手及側(cè)身上手為輔。2、在發(fā)球時,兩種不同打法選手都以發(fā)近網(wǎng)短球為主,其次兩面反膠選手較多使用半出臺球,不同性能球拍選手更多配合底線長球的使用。第三板技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運用中,兩種不同打法選手進(jìn)攻技術(shù)使用率均為最高,不同性能球拍選手進(jìn)攻使用率、失分率都高于兩面反膠選手,尤其是反手攻(彈)技術(shù)。不同性能球拍選手第三板進(jìn)攻落點大多為對手反手位,兩面反膠選手回球落點變化較多。3、在接發(fā)球技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的運用上,兩面反膠選手控制類技術(shù)使用率高,劈長是其主要得分手段。不同性能球拍選手進(jìn)攻技術(shù)使用率最高,其主要使用與得分技術(shù)為反手攻(彈)。兩面反膠選手在接中路短球時較多使用正手?jǐn)[短或劈長,不同性能球拍選手更多依賴使用反手顆粒膠進(jìn)行彈擊從而掌握進(jìn)攻的主動。第四板技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運用時,兩面反膠選手防守類技術(shù)使用率與失分率偏高,不同性能球拍選手進(jìn)攻類技術(shù)使用率與失分率較高。在二、四板技戰(zhàn)術(shù)組合中,兩面反膠選手控防組合使用率最高且失分率高,不同性能球拍選手多采用連續(xù)攻技術(shù)組合,以反手連續(xù)攻的使用率最高。4、兩種不同打法選手相持段最后一板使用反手比例均為最高,尤其是連續(xù)反手組合,兩面反膠選手相持段最后一板反手使用效果優(yōu)于不同性能球拍選手。兩種不同打法選手在相持段都注重回球落點的變化,增加對手跑動范圍。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author takes the excellent women's double-sided backgel-attacking players in the world and the racket players with different performances as research objects, such as Ding Ning, Zhu Yuling, Fukuhara Ai, and Muzi, and applies the method of observation and statistics and comparative analysis. Statistical analysis was made on the technical and tactical use of 172 innings in 32 games. Based on the comparative analysis of the characteristics of technical and tactical gains and losses between the two types of players, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. There is no significant difference in the utilization rate of the three segments between the two different playing methods, and the scoring rate of the two backgels is higher than that of the other. Racket rackets with different performances have a higher scoring rate. The utilization rate of racket players with different performances was significantly higher than that of two backgels, especially on the receiving wheel, but the scoring rate was lower than that of the two backgels. Two different types of players are mainly backhand players, forehand and sideways upper hand as auxiliary. 2. When serving, the two different types of players play mainly in short netting, and in the second two sides of the reverse rubber players use half out billiards more often. Racket players with different performances are more likely to cooperate with the use of the baseline long ball. In the use of the third board technique and tactics, the utilization rate of attack techniques of the two different types of players is the highest, and the attack rate and the loss rate of the racket players with different performances are all higher than those of the two sides of the backhand attack (bomb) technique. The third board attack point of racquet players with different performances is mostly the backhand position of the opponent, and the backhand position of the backers on both sides of the racket is more varied. 3. In the application of the receiving and serving techniques and tactics, the control techniques of the two backgels players have a high utilization rate. Split length is its main means of scoring. Different performance racket player attack technique utilization rate is the highest, its main use and the score technique is backhand attack (bomb). The forehand short or long forehand is more used by the backhand racket players, and the racket players with different performances rely more on the backhand particle glue to grasp the initiative of attack. In the use of the fourth board technique and tactics, the utilization rate and the loss rate of defensive techniques were higher than those of the players with different performances, and the utilization rate and the loss rate of offensive techniques were higher than those of the players with different performances. In the second and fourth board technical and tactical combinations, the two sides of the anti-rubber players had the highest utilization rate of the control and defense combinations and the high loss rate. The racket players with different performances mostly used the combination of continuous attack techniques, and the highest utilization rate was the backhand continuous attack. 4. The proportion of backhand used in the last board of the two different playing methods is the highest, especially the backhand combination. The result of using the last backhand in the holding section is better than that in the racket with different performances. Two different types of players in each other focus on the change of the ball landing point, increase the range of the opponent running.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G846

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 米多多;;百款反膠體重手冊[J];乒乓世界;2007年03期

2 李克非;;反膠新生代12款反膠橫向評測[J];乒乓世界;2007年04期

3 閑云;趙暉;;“黏”字訣 729“天驕”系列反膠縱向測評[J];乒乓世界;2007年05期

4 黃振寰;喻江云;;反膠水[J];聰明泉(少兒版);2012年01期

5 孫嵐云,畢玉增;論反膠硬質(zhì)海綿球拍的優(yōu)越性[J];山東工程學(xué)院學(xué)報;1995年02期

6 李洪鐘;阮國璧;;論反膠海綿拍的先進(jìn)性[J];中國體育科技;1982年23期

7 王吉生;弧圈球與反膠球拍[J];乒乓世界;2002年01期

8 ;男子削球:漸進(jìn)[J];乒乓世界;2003年10期

9 辛京華;重新書寫球史的旋轉(zhuǎn)球王——伊藤繁雄[J];乒乓世界;2003年05期

10 王濤;放不下的球拍(二)[J];新體育;1997年11期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 記者張彤薇;環(huán)保型乒乓球拍在天津“現(xiàn)身”[N];中國技術(shù)市場報;2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉楊;新型親和反膠團(tuán)系統(tǒng)及其蛋白質(zhì)萃取特性研究[D];天津大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 葉夢R，

本文編號：2325985