【摘要】：如今,越來(lái)越多的國(guó)家開始重視體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,體育產(chǎn)業(yè)逐漸成為了國(guó)內(nèi)外的朝陽(yáng)產(chǎn)業(yè)。在西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家被看做是國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的動(dòng)力之一,對(duì)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的貢獻(xiàn)度相對(duì)較高。相比之下我國(guó)對(duì)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的占比低且差距明顯,呈現(xiàn)出顯著的區(qū)域化特征。要想均衡各區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,就需要對(duì)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力進(jìn)行全面細(xì)致的評(píng)價(jià),了解內(nèi)部的具體影響因素。所以,針對(duì)區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的研究不能只停留在邏輯分析法、專家訪談法等層面,需要用更科學(xué)高效的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析方法來(lái)研究體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,明確現(xiàn)實(shí)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的大小及各地區(qū)的優(yōu)勢(shì)。本文綜合了波特鉆石理論和指標(biāo)選取原則,在參考了大量的文獻(xiàn)資料后,總結(jié)建立了綜合評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)體系,對(duì)全國(guó)31個(gè)省(市、自治區(qū))進(jìn)行了量化分析,目的在于全面了解各地區(qū)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r。通常對(duì)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的研究大多只選用了一種評(píng)價(jià)方法,本文通過(guò)聚類分析和因子分析法從整體到局部多個(gè)角度反映了我國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,科學(xué)的審視不同省份之間的差距。首先在傳統(tǒng)聚類方法的基礎(chǔ)上采用了主成分-聚類分析法,從整體上對(duì)我國(guó)各區(qū)域進(jìn)行了初步的劃分。然后采用因子分析法,確定了區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的前四個(gè)公共因子,即產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展因子、產(chǎn)業(yè)消費(fèi)因子、相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)及設(shè)施因子和產(chǎn)業(yè)投入因子,并且通過(guò)計(jì)算因子得分得到了 31個(gè)省(市、自治區(qū))的綜合得分排名,從內(nèi)部特征具體分析了各區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的優(yōu)劣勢(shì)。最后,對(duì)兩種實(shí)證方法歸納總結(jié),將我國(guó)區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力劃分為四類地區(qū):第一類是競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力優(yōu)勢(shì)地區(qū)(北京、上海),第二類是競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力強(qiáng)勁地區(qū)(廣東、浙江、江蘇、山東),第三類是競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力中等地區(qū)(河北、河南、四川、遼寧、湖北、湖南、黑龍江、福建),第四類是競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力落后地區(qū)(天津、內(nèi)蒙古、重慶、青海、寧夏、廣西、云南、山西、江西、陜西、安徽、吉林、新疆、西藏、海南、貴州、甘肅)。并且針對(duì)各類地區(qū)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力大小給出了相應(yīng)的建議。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, more and more countries begin to attach importance to the development of sports industry, and sports industry has gradually become the sunrise industry at home and abroad. In the western developed countries, it is regarded as one of the driving forces of national economic growth, and its contribution to the national economy is relatively high. By contrast, the proportion of our country to the national economy is low and the gap is obvious. In order to balance the development of sports industry in various regions, it is necessary to evaluate the competitiveness of sports industry in a comprehensive and meticulous way, and to understand the specific factors affecting the competitiveness of the sports industry. Therefore, the research on the competitiveness of regional sports industry can not only stay at the level of logic analysis, expert interview, etc., but also need to use more scientific and efficient statistical analysis method to study the development of sports industry. Clear the size of realistic competitiveness and the advantages of each region. This paper synthesizes Porter's diamond theory and the principle of index selection, after referring to a lot of literature, summarizes and establishes the index system of comprehensive evaluation, and carries on the quantitative analysis to 31 provinces (cities and autonomous regions) of the whole country. The purpose is to understand the competitive development of sports industry in all regions. Usually, most of the researches on the competitiveness of sports industry only use one evaluation method. This paper reflects the competitiveness of our country's sports industry from the whole to the local angles by cluster analysis and factor analysis. Scientifically examine the differences between different provinces. Based on the traditional clustering method, the principal component clustering method is used to divide the regions of our country as a whole. Then the first four public factors of the competitiveness of regional sports industry are determined by factor analysis, that is, industrial development factor, industrial consumption factor, related industry and facilities factor and industrial input factor. And through the calculation factor score obtained 31 provinces (cities, autonomous regions) comprehensive score ranking, from the internal characteristics of the specific analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of regional sports industry competitiveness. Finally, the paper summarizes the two empirical methods and divides the regional sports industry competitiveness into four categories: the first is competitive advantage region (Beijing, Shanghai), the second is strong competitive region (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu). Shandong), the third category is the middle competitive regions (Hebei, Henan, Sichuan, Liaoning, Hubei, Hunan, Heilongjiang, Fujian), the fourth is the backward competitive regions (Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Chongqing, Qinghai, Ningxia, Guangxi, Yunnan, Shanxi, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Anhui, Jilin, Xinjiang, Tibet, Hainan, Guizhou, Gansu). At the same time, the corresponding suggestions are given for the competitiveness of various regions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G80-052

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張欣;;基于模糊理論的體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2017年01期

2 路連舉;;區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的評(píng)估與實(shí)證研究[J];企業(yè)改革與管理;2014年21期

3 閆琳琳;張?chǎng)?張波;;基于因子分析的區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];河北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

4 薛琨;;山東省體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力影響因素研究[J];山東體育科技;2014年04期

5 胡效芳;袁藝;許紹飛;;中國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力綜合評(píng)價(jià)——基于31個(gè)省區(qū)的比較研究[J];西安財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

6 王艷;張貴敏;;區(qū)域優(yōu)勢(shì)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇的基本依據(jù)——基于因子分析法的體育產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展條件研究[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年09期

7 周良君;李凡;;中外都市體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)體系與實(shí)證研究[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

8 李穎;劉翠娥;;我國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的演化進(jìn)程及其動(dòng)力機(jī)制研究[J];河北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

9 馬天龍;田蕓;呂巖;;因子分析在河北體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)商貿(mào);2009年13期

10 盧金逵;倪剛;熊建萍;;區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)與實(shí)證研究[J];體育科學(xué);2009年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳林會(huì);區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)增長(zhǎng)極培育研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

2 盧曉梅;我國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金發(fā)展模式研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉貫飛;基于層次分析法的四川省體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

2 董小亮;區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力分析與評(píng)價(jià)[D];江蘇大學(xué);2010年

3 盧金逵;區(qū)域體育產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)與實(shí)證研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2009年

4 詹玉萍;基于比較優(yōu)勢(shì)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究[D];大連交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2306346