世界優(yōu)秀橫拍進攻型選手馬龍、樊振東的技戰(zhàn)術特征對比分析
[Abstract]:In this paper, the techniques and tactics of Ma Long and Fan Zhendong in 30 major competitions from 2014 to 2016 were studied and analyzed by means of literature, video observation, mathematical statistics and logic analysis. From the aspects of technology, landing point, circuit and technical combination of the two people in the competition, the author hopes to find the advantages and disadvantages of their respective techniques and tactics, as well as the similarities and differences between the two men, and to sum up the rules. It also provides some feasible suggestions for the training and competition of Chinese table tennis team in the future. Through research and analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. Fan Zhendong has the same proportion of lateral spin, reverse spin and no spin, Ma Long has more lateral spin, and the main landing point is short ball, but the direct scoring rate of Ma Long is higher than that of Fan Zhendong. Among the three boards, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong both focused on robberies and robberies, but Ma Long's use rate of attack was even higher. In the third and fifth boards of convergence, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong were in the third board, and the fifth board was mainly backhand. 2. In the use of the tactics of firing and snatching, Ma Long usually takes continuous attack after serving, while Fan Zhendong's side spin and reverse lateral spin are mainly continuous attacks. After serving and not turning the ball, most of them are controlled back attack. 3. When receiving the serve, Ma Long uses more control and control than Fan Zhendong. Fan Zhendong to grab more than Ma Long. Ma Long and Fan Zhendong both focused on back-to-back attacks in connection with the second and fourth boards. In the four or six boards convergence, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong were both continuous backhands. 4. In the use of the tactics of grabbing and snatching, the scoring rate and the rate of utilization of successive attacks after taking control were relatively high. The utilization rate and scoring rate of successive attacks after Fan Zhendong's receiving serve is relatively higher. 5. In the technical convergence of the last two boards, Ma Long and Fan Zhendong used the most continuous backhand, followed by backhand pulling and connecting forehand pull. The results were both mediocre. Ma Long is relatively better.
【學位授予單位】:北京體育大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G846
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 ;專訪“卷毛”:我是進攻型輔助,勤思考對輔助有幫助[J];電子競技;2012年24期
2 丁丁;;新規(guī)則對橫拍進攻型打法發(fā)展趨勢的影響[J];吉林體育學院學報;2007年05期
3 王林王;;你為什么不到30就結婚?[J];傳奇文學選刊;2006年11期
4 喬伊·瑞夫;金路;;進攻型接發(fā)球[J];網(wǎng)球;2013年02期
5 林仁布,馬凱旋;橫拍正手拉弧圈球(以右手握拍為例)[J];乒乓世界;2004年01期
6 蔡振華;橫拍進攻型打法之我見[J];乒乓世界;1999年06期
7 楊從善;主動因和被動因[J];求索;1982年02期
8 蔡振華;橫拍進攻型打法之我見[J];乒乓世界;1999年07期
9 李旭武;第46屆世乒賽男子優(yōu)秀橫拍進攻型運動員接發(fā)球技術分析[J];體育學刊;2001年06期
10 鄭相龍,樸元相,姜吉福;淺談足球進攻型打法與防守型打法的區(qū)別及其主要特征[J];延邊大學學報(自然科學版);2001年02期
相關會議論文 前1條
1 趙霞;蘇丕仁;;對新規(guī)則下直拍進攻型打法發(fā)展趨勢的研究[A];第七屆全國體育科學大會論文摘要匯編(二)[C];2004年
相關重要報紙文章 前3條
1 本報記者 徐國杰;以進攻型思路進行配置[N];中國證券報;2006年
2 本報記者 梁曉亮;邱則有:我對專利著了迷[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2011年
3 大時代投資 王瞬;牛市行情宜用進攻型策略[N];證券日報;2006年
相關碩士學位論文 前10條
1 付天星;我國進攻型打法運動員近臺與中遠臺相持能力研究[D];武漢體育學院;2015年
2 王瀟逸;國內外優(yōu)秀男子乒乓球橫拍進攻型打法選手技戰(zhàn)術對比分析[D];北京體育大學;2016年
3 秦帥江;世界優(yōu)秀橫拍進攻型選手馬龍、樊振東的技戰(zhàn)術特征對比分析[D];北京體育大學;2017年
4 于江川;中國優(yōu)秀男子橫拍進攻型打法運動員技戰(zhàn)術組合特點的研究[D];北京體育大學;2014年
5 劉同師;中外優(yōu)秀男子橫拍進攻型打法乒乓球選手戰(zhàn)術特征對比研究[D];北京體育大學;2010年
6 時參軍;世界優(yōu)秀男子乒乓球橫拍進攻型運動員技戰(zhàn)術特點的研究[D];北京體育大學;2009年
7 張承英;馬龍對橫拍進攻型選手技戰(zhàn)術組合運用的分析[D];北京體育大學;2012年
8 張茺;世界乒乓球優(yōu)秀男子進攻型打法選手發(fā)搶段技戰(zhàn)術特征[D];北京體育大學;2013年
9 張凡;世界優(yōu)秀乒乓球男子進攻型選手臺內球技戰(zhàn)術運用分析[D];北京體育大學;2009年
10 劉子瑜;國外優(yōu)秀男子乒乓球橫拍進攻型選手的技戰(zhàn)術特征[D];北京體育大學;2013年
,本文編號:2274906
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2274906.html