發(fā)布時間：2018-07-11 12:25

  本文選題：奧運會 + 女子體操��； 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：對2016年里約奧運會女子體操項目的比賽成績做出準(zhǔn)確的統(tǒng)計并在此基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行科學(xué)的比較分析,能夠從數(shù)據(jù)中找到目前世界高水平運動員在比賽中的得分點,進(jìn)一步明確我國運動員在比賽中同優(yōu)秀選手之間的差距,這不僅能夠為我國運動員今后的參賽和備戰(zhàn)提供一個更加明確的指向,同時也能夠讓眾多從事國家隊訓(xùn)練備戰(zhàn)的工作人員更加清晰的認(rèn)識到我國運動員在訓(xùn)練中存在哪些需要繼續(xù)保持的得分點。因此本文以第31屆里約奧運會女子團(tuán)體項目決賽(前四名)得失分對比情況為研究對象,通過對比賽得失分的統(tǒng)計分析進(jìn)一步明確國外高水平選手的優(yōu)勢以及我國選手存在的問題,并結(jié)合國際奧運會采用的2013年版競技體操規(guī)則為參考,以及技術(shù)動作評分為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),在此基礎(chǔ)上運用相關(guān)理論知識和方法,進(jìn)一步完善我國優(yōu)秀女子體操運動員的訓(xùn)練和備戰(zhàn)情況,為上級部門提供一個今后指導(dǎo)不同訓(xùn)練等級運動員訓(xùn)練和參賽的建議,從而提高我國女子體操運動員的綜合競技水平,為我國競技體操項目的持續(xù)發(fā)展做出一點微薄貢獻(xiàn)。本研究通過文獻(xiàn)資料法、專家訪談法、錄像分析法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計法和對比分析法等研究方法,對第31屆奧運會體操女子團(tuán)體決賽得失分成績進(jìn)行對比分析,得出以下研究結(jié)論:(1)從比賽整體來看,美國隊的優(yōu)勢比較明顯,整個比賽過程沒有明顯失誤,而我國選手由于對團(tuán)體比賽的認(rèn)知程度比較低,一些高水平運動員在比賽中出現(xiàn)了幾次較大失誤,成績直線下滑。(2)在比賽的整體難度上,美國隊?wèi){借明顯的力量優(yōu)勢和技術(shù)優(yōu)勢同后續(xù)隊伍形成了較大差距,而我國選手在整體難度上僅次于美國隊,但是在跳馬項目上的難度還需進(jìn)一步提高。而日本、英國、德國在一些項目上的難度分已經(jīng)同中美俄三國縮小了差距。(3)在比賽的整體完成質(zhì)量上,美國隊以接近零失誤的表現(xiàn)排在各參賽隊之首,而我國選手由于兩次重大失誤導(dǎo)致在完成分上比較低。而荷蘭、德國等國家則憑借較低難度的動作獲得了高完成分。(4)在跳馬項目上,美國隊的優(yōu)勢較為明顯,同時俄羅斯隊表現(xiàn)也較為出色,中國選手在技術(shù)上難以達(dá)到與程菲相匹配的能力,導(dǎo)致了我國選手普遍存在騰空高度不夠、騰空屈膝等專項技術(shù)的扣分點,逐漸同俄羅斯和美國的力量型選手拉開了差距。(5)在高低杠項目上,美國隊表現(xiàn)中規(guī)中矩,其在弱勢項目上也采取了以穩(wěn)為主的比賽策略,但是中國隊由于商春松的失誤導(dǎo)致了比賽成績的下滑,選手在高低杠上同其他國家的差距在進(jìn)一步減小。(6)在平衡木項目上,美國選手憑借較高的穩(wěn)定性領(lǐng)先于中國隊,但是中美兩國仍然是這一項目上的優(yōu)勢國家,同其他國家間形成了較大的差距。(7)在自由操項目上,美國隊的霸主地位無法撼動,高難動作男子化,H組的難度動作完成質(zhì)量很高,我國選手毛藝的重大失誤導(dǎo)致比分與美國隊和俄羅斯隊形成了很大的差距。在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對我國選手今后的訓(xùn)練和備戰(zhàn)提出以下建議:(1)加強女子體操梯隊建設(shè):形成明確的新老銜接機制,增加隊員的大賽經(jīng)驗。(2)加強不同項目訓(xùn)練的針對性:優(yōu)勢項目提升難度,劣勢項目穩(wěn)定基礎(chǔ)。(3)加強運動員心理素質(zhì)訓(xùn)練:注重賽前輔導(dǎo)評估與賽后調(diào)整與疏導(dǎo)。(4)加強運動員力量素質(zhì)訓(xùn)練:專人指導(dǎo)、創(chuàng)新手段、縮小差距。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the accurate statistics of the results of the women's gymnastics events in the Rio Olympic Games in 2016 and the scientific comparison and Analysis on this basis, we can find out the points of the world high level athletes in the competition from the data, and further clarify the gap between the athletes and the excellent players in the competition, which can not only be used for me. At the same time, the athletes who are engaged in the training of the national team have a clearer understanding of what needs to be kept in the training of our athletes. Therefore, the final four of the thirty-first Rio Olympic Games women's group final (first four) According to the statistical analysis of the score and loss of the competition, the advantages of the high level foreign players and the problems existing in our country are further clarified by the statistical analysis of the score and loss of the competition. Knowledge and methods, further improve the training and preparation of excellent women gymnasts in our country, and provide a suggestion for the superior departments to guide the training and competition of different training class athletes in the future, so as to improve the comprehensive competitive level of Chinese gymnasts and make a little bit for the sustainable development of our competitive gymnasts. By means of literature, expert interview, video analysis, mathematical statistics and comparative analysis, this study makes a comparative analysis of the score and loss scores of the women's team final in the thirty-first Olympic Games, and draws the following conclusions: (1) from the overall point of view of the competition, the advantages of the United States team are more obvious, the whole process of the competition. There are no obvious mistakes, and the Chinese players have a low level of cognition to the group competition. Some high level athletes have made several big mistakes in the competition and the results have slipped straight. (2) in the overall difficulty of the competition, the United States has formed a big gap with the follow-up team with obvious strength advantage and technical advantage, and the Chinese players are in great gap. The difficulty of the overall difficulty is second to the United States team, but the difficulty in the vault needs to be further improved. While Japan, the UK, and Germany have narrowed the gap between the two countries. (3) in the overall quality of the competition, the United States team is the first of the teams to be close to zero error, and the Chinese players Holland, Germany and other countries gained high completion points with lower difficulty. (4) in the vault, the advantage of the United States was more obvious and the Russian team was better, and the Chinese players were unable to match Cheng Fei's ability to match Cheng Fei. In our country, there is a general gap between the height of the vacant height, the point of the vacant knee and other special techniques, and the gap between the Russian and American strength players. (5) on the uneven bars project, the United States has shown the best performance, and it has also adopted a stable competition strategy on the disadvantaged projects, but the Chinese team is due to the mistakes of the Chinese pine. The difference between the players on the uneven bars and other countries was further reduced. (6) on the balance beam project, the United States led to the Chinese team with high stability, but China and the United States are still the dominant country on this project, forming a big gap with other countries. (7) the free exercise program. On the other hand, the hegemony of the American team can not be shaken and the difficult action is masculine. The difficulty of the H group is very high. The major error of Chinese players' wool art leads to a big gap between the American team and the Russian team. On this basis, the following suggestions are put forward to our athletes' training and preparation in the future: (1) strengthening the women's Gymnastic ladder. Team building: forming a clear new and old link mechanism to increase the experience of the players in the competition. (2) strengthening the pertinence of different project training: the difficulty of improving the superiority project, the stable foundation of the inferior project. (3) strengthen the athletes' psychological quality training: pay attention to the pre game guidance evaluation and after the competition adjustment and guide. (4) strengthen the strength quality training of the athletes: special person guidance, Innovative means to narrow the gap.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G832

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 侯海燕;;第45屆世界體操錦標(biāo)賽中國體操隊成績分析[J];體育文化導(dǎo)刊;2015年05期

2 竭曉安;;從第44屆世錦賽看新周期國際女子體操競爭格局及各單項發(fā)展趨勢[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年11期

3 方向麗;王萬朋;韓恩力;;我國女子體操項目優(yōu)勢區(qū)域分析——基于第6-12屆全運會[J];河北體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年02期

4 劉巖;;第30屆奧運會我國女子競技體操比賽失利的原因分析[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2012年05期

5 陳旭暉;;從第43屆體操世錦賽審視中國女子體操隊倫敦奧運會的競爭實力[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年06期

6 韓華;盧慶榮;;當(dāng)今世界女子自由體操技術(shù)發(fā)展的新趨向——第42屆世界體操錦標(biāo)賽分析[J];濟(jì)寧學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年03期

7 傅芳香;宋允清;;從近三屆奧運會評析我國體操女隊的實力及倫敦奧運會備戰(zhàn)的策略[J];四川體育科學(xué);2012年03期

8 陳立農(nóng);唐曉丹;;從43屆世界體操錦標(biāo)賽前瞻倫敦奧運會中國女子競技體操[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年03期

9 王海云;李佐惠;;從第42、43兩屆體操世錦賽比賽成績分析中國女子體操隊現(xiàn)狀[J];安徽體育科技;2012年02期

10 姚可軍;;從2011年第43屆體操錦標(biāo)賽看倫敦奧運會女子競技體操的前景[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馮瑞;中國競技體操制勝規(guī)律探驪[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 危琳琳;我國女子競技體操的訓(xùn)練理念與規(guī)則演變的關(guān)系[D];集美大學(xué);2012年

2 張澤軍;女子競技體操評分規(guī)則的演變特征及影響因素研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2006年

3 朱e，

本文編號：2115195