本文選題：杠鈴 + Keiser��； 參考：《天津體育學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在體育訓(xùn)練中,僅僅靠自身阻力訓(xùn)練是很難取得良好的訓(xùn)練效果,往往依靠外界器械對人體的肌肉施加影響,促進(jìn)身體素質(zhì)的發(fā)展,發(fā)展下肢爆發(fā)力就是其中之一。在大科技研究的背景下,爆發(fā)力訓(xùn)練器械層出不窮,訓(xùn)練效果也各有千秋。我們最常用的傳統(tǒng)杠鈴發(fā)展下肢爆發(fā)力,它有一套完整的訓(xùn)練理論和方法。具有操作簡單、方便,容易掌握的特點(diǎn)。keiser氣阻爆發(fā)功率訓(xùn)練儀器是利用氣體壓力作為阻力的訓(xùn)練器械,它的特點(diǎn)是使用時(shí)能夠均勻而平穩(wěn)地傳送正或者負(fù)的阻力,減少負(fù)荷量和負(fù)荷強(qiáng)度的變化對運(yùn)動(dòng)員關(guān)節(jié)、肌肉、韌帶和其他組織器官的傷害,將運(yùn)動(dòng)員受傷的可能性降低到最大限度。cormax末端爆發(fā)力釋放訓(xùn)練器械利用液體壓力作為阻力的訓(xùn)練器械,簡單的說,就是將負(fù)重扔出去,它的特點(diǎn)是訓(xùn)練更加貼近專項(xiàng)動(dòng)作模式,能在整個(gè)運(yùn)動(dòng)過程中保持加速狀態(tài)。有研究已經(jīng)證明在50%RM負(fù)荷下發(fā)展下肢爆發(fā)力,keiser氣阻爆發(fā)功率訓(xùn)練儀器訓(xùn)練效果優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)杠鈴組。同時(shí)也有研究證明在10周訓(xùn)練后深蹲跳測試中,cormax末端爆發(fā)力釋放訓(xùn)練器械訓(xùn)練效果優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)杠鈴組。而三者之間的比較較少。本文旨在從三種不同形式負(fù)荷刺激深蹲的角度出發(fā),結(jié)合運(yùn)動(dòng)員發(fā)展下肢爆發(fā)力的特點(diǎn),主要利用“JUST JUMP”彈跳墊作為測試下肢爆發(fā)力的測試儀器,通過實(shí)驗(yàn)前后對比的方法來討論分析三種器械的對發(fā)展下肢爆發(fā)力的優(yōu)劣。本研究利用文獻(xiàn)資料法,獲得大量國內(nèi)外關(guān)于發(fā)展下肢爆發(fā)力的文獻(xiàn)資料,為本次研究實(shí)驗(yàn)的設(shè)計(jì)和實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果分析提供充分的理論依據(jù);然后以天津體育學(xué)院研究生部的18名學(xué)生作為實(shí)驗(yàn)對象,實(shí)驗(yàn)分成三組:Ⅰ組keiser氣阻爆發(fā)功率訓(xùn)練組、Ⅱ組傳統(tǒng)抗阻力訓(xùn)練組、Ⅲ組cormax末端爆發(fā)力釋放訓(xùn)練組,進(jìn)行為期8周的實(shí)驗(yàn)訓(xùn)練,實(shí)驗(yàn)前后通過“JUST JUMP”彈跳墊對所有受試者的SJ、CMJ原地縱跳的騰空時(shí)間、騰空高度,四次連續(xù)縱跳的反應(yīng)時(shí)間、平均騰空高度、爆發(fā)力指數(shù)進(jìn)行測試,對比分析三種不同深蹲刺激形式后受試者各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的變化情況,最終得出以下研究結(jié)論:(1)Cormax末端爆發(fā)力釋放儀器經(jīng)過8周訓(xùn)練干預(yù)后,受試者下肢伸肌群在預(yù)先拉長狀態(tài)下突然啟動(dòng)收縮能力以及離心收縮迅速轉(zhuǎn)換向心收縮能力增強(qiáng),增長幅度優(yōu)于其它兩種器械。(2)keiser氣阻訓(xùn)練儀器經(jīng)過8周訓(xùn)練干預(yù)后,受試者下肢伸肌群在預(yù)先拉長狀態(tài)下突然啟動(dòng)收縮能力以及離心收縮迅速轉(zhuǎn)換向心收縮能力增強(qiáng),增長幅度高于杠鈴訓(xùn)練儀器,低于cormax末端爆發(fā)力釋放儀器。(3)杠鈴訓(xùn)練儀器經(jīng)過8周訓(xùn)練干預(yù)后,受試者下肢伸肌群在預(yù)先拉長狀態(tài)下突然啟動(dòng)收縮能力以及離心收縮迅速轉(zhuǎn)換向心收縮能力略有增強(qiáng),增長幅度較其他兩種器械增幅最小。(4)經(jīng)過8周三種不同方式訓(xùn)練干預(yù)后,再進(jìn)行just jump彈跳測試和等速肌力測試,Cormax末端爆發(fā)力釋放儀器訓(xùn)練下肢爆發(fā)力效果優(yōu)于其它兩種訓(xùn)練器械。
[Abstract]:In sports training, it is difficult to get good training effect only by self resistance training. It often depends on external instruments to exert influence on human muscles, promote the development of body quality and develop the explosive force of lower limbs. In the background of large science and technology research, the explosive force training instruments emerge in endlessly, and the training effect is also varied. Our most commonly used barbell to develop the lower limb explosive force, it has a complete set of training theory and method. It has the characteristics of simple operation, convenient, easy to master,.Keiser gas resistance explosion power training instrument is a training instrument using gas pressure as resistance, its characteristic is to make the use of a uniform and steady transmission of positive or negative. Resistance, reducing the damage of load and load intensity on the athletes' joints, muscles, ligaments and other tissues and organs, reducing the possibility of the athlete's injury to the maximum.Cormax end explosive force to release the training apparatus to use liquid pressure as a resistance training instrument, simply to throw the weight out. Its characteristics are The training is more close to the special action mode and can be accelerated during the whole movement. Research has proved that lower limb explosive force is developed under the load of 50%RM, and the training effect of Keiser gas resistance explosion power training instrument is better than that of the traditional barbell group. At the same time, there are also studies showing that in the squat jump test after 10 weeks of training, the explosive force of the cormax end is released. The training effect of the training apparatus is better than that of the traditional barbell group. The comparison between the three ones is less. This paper aims to start from the angle of three different forms of load stimulation, and combine the characteristics of the athlete's development of the lower limb explosive force, and mainly use the "JUST JUMP" springing pad as a test instrument for the test of the lower extremity explosion force, through comparison before and after the experiment. Methods to discuss and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the three instruments for the development of lower limb explosive force. The literature data method was used to obtain a large number of literature on the development of lower limb explosive force at home and abroad, and provided sufficient theoretical basis for the design and analysis of experimental results of this study; however, 18 students from the Graduate Department of Tianjin University of Sport were after the study. As the experimental object, the experiment was divided into three groups: group I Keiser air resistance explosion power training group, group II traditional resistance training group, group III cormax end explosive force release training group, 8 weeks of experimental training, before and after the experiment, through the "JUST JUMP" jump mat for all subjects SJ, CMJ original jump time, vacate height, four The reaction time of the secondary longitudinal jump, the average altitude and the explosive force index were tested, and the changes of the indexes of the subjects after three different types of squat stimulation were compared and analyzed. Finally, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) the Cormax terminal explosive force release instrument after 8 weeks of training and drills, the lower extremities of the subjects were elongated in advance. The ability of sudden contraction and rapid conversion of centrifugal contraction to centripetal contraction was enhanced, and the increase was better than that of the other two instruments. (2) after 8 weeks of training after 8 weeks of training, the lower extremities of the lower extremities of the subjects had a sudden contraction ability and a rapid conversion of the centrifugal contractile to the cardiac contractility. The increase is higher than the barbell training instrument, lower than the cormax end explosive force release instrument. (3) after 8 weeks of training, the barbell training instrument has a sudden contraction ability of the lower extremities of the lower extremities and the rapid conversion of the centrifuge contraction to the centripetal contraction ability, and the increase is the most higher than that of the other two instruments. (4) after 8 Wednesday training, the just jump springing test and the isokinetic muscle strength test were performed, and the explosive force of the Cormax terminal explosive force was better than the other two kinds of training instruments.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G804.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王彤;;深蹲練習(xí)對50米蛙泳成績的影響研究——以北京體育大學(xué)教育學(xué)院2010級游泳專項(xiàng)學(xué)生為例[J];青少年體育;2015年05期

2 王鋒;李成梁;王新雷;孫萍;;論末端釋放訓(xùn)練及其在競技體育中的應(yīng)用[J];體育科學(xué);2015年04期

3 王少偉;;KEISER訓(xùn)練儀對跳遠(yuǎn)運(yùn)動(dòng)員擺動(dòng)腿擺動(dòng)效果的研究[J];文體用品與科技;2015年08期

4 張洋;趙金戈;阮棉芳;;關(guān)于縱跳比立定跳遠(yuǎn)更能準(zhǔn)確評定下肢爆發(fā)力的研究[J];浙江體育科學(xué);2015年02期

5 劉耀榮;;杠鈴訓(xùn)練:提高力量和爆發(fā)力的有效途徑[J];體育世界(下旬刊);2013年04期

6 劉凱;;功能性力量訓(xùn)練與傳統(tǒng)力量訓(xùn)練的比較[J];科技信息;2012年22期

7 解長青;;肌纖維類型與運(yùn)動(dòng)訓(xùn)練[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年02期

8 黃志平;尹彥;劉敏;黃中校;楊小英;蘇玉林;;等速肌力測試與訓(xùn)練技術(shù)的研究進(jìn)展[J];體育科技;2011年04期

9 周生靈;;振動(dòng)訓(xùn)練對田徑運(yùn)動(dòng)員下肢爆發(fā)力和身體成分的長時(shí)效應(yīng)研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年11期

10 張曉英;;漸進(jìn)性抗阻力量訓(xùn)練對普通人群力量、最大攝氧量與最大有氧功率的影響[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 李光軍;趙煥彬;師玉濤;閆琪;孫科;;兩種深蹲模式負(fù)重時(shí)表面肌電信號特征[A];第十六屆全國運(yùn)動(dòng)生物力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流大會(huì)（CABS 2013）論文集[C];2013年

2 鄒亮疇;;非極限負(fù)荷氣動(dòng)變阻力量訓(xùn)練效果比較分析[A];2007廣東省體育科學(xué)研究論文選[C];2007年

3 任滿迎;劉穎;白遠(yuǎn)韶;;對2009年第十一屆全運(yùn)會(huì)體操全能冠軍滕海濱肌力特征的個(gè)案分析和針對性訓(xùn)練效果的研究[A];第十四屆全國運(yùn)動(dòng)生物力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流大會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王曉東;振動(dòng)訓(xùn)練對足球?qū)ｍ?xiàng)大學(xué)生專項(xiàng)身體素質(zhì)影響的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 潘津平;負(fù)重深蹲與半蹲訓(xùn)練對下肢力量及核心區(qū)穩(wěn)定性影響對比研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2015年

2 李海峰;CMJ方式起跳發(fā)力出現(xiàn)2次峰值原因的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];西安體育學(xué)院;2013年

3 吳揚(yáng);江蘇省優(yōu)秀后備男子網(wǎng)球運(yùn)動(dòng)員正反手上旋球下肢的運(yùn)動(dòng)學(xué)分析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

4 陳海燕;Plyometric訓(xùn)練對青少年男子中長跑運(yùn)動(dòng)員專項(xiàng)能力的影響[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2010年

5 任滿迎;同振幅下不同頻率振動(dòng)刺激對肌肉力量訓(xùn)練效果的對比研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2100911