本文選題：第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì) + 蹦床比賽�。� 參考：《山西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)蹦床男子個(gè)人項(xiàng)目的競(jìng)技水平在國(guó)際上處于領(lǐng)先的地位,但是,國(guó)外選手的競(jìng)技水平也在不斷上升,中國(guó)想要繼續(xù)保持并擴(kuò)大我們?cè)诒拇岔?xiàng)目上的優(yōu)勢(shì),就必須知己知彼并不斷創(chuàng)新。本文運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)資料法、訪談法、錄像觀察法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)法和對(duì)比分析等方法,對(duì)第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)蹦床比賽中外優(yōu)秀男子運(yùn)動(dòng)員在比賽時(shí)成套動(dòng)作的難度選擇及編排方面進(jìn)行了比較研究,為提高我國(guó)男子蹦床運(yùn)動(dòng)員的競(jìng)技水平提供理論參考。研究結(jié)果表明:1.預(yù)賽規(guī)定成套動(dòng)作難度與編排:規(guī)定成套中只計(jì)算兩個(gè)動(dòng)作難度,其他八個(gè)動(dòng)作均以單周為主,成套難度值范圍在3.1-3.5分之間,我國(guó)高磊和董棟分別為3.4和3.3分,在難度分上低于俄羅斯Andrey YUDIN和日本Masaki ITO的3.5分,但是我國(guó)高磊以較高的完成分和高度分位于第一名。預(yù)賽規(guī)定成套編排結(jié)果表明,除了俄羅斯的兩名運(yùn)動(dòng)員在預(yù)賽規(guī)定動(dòng)作第一個(gè)計(jì)算難度的動(dòng)作編排中選擇在前兩個(gè)動(dòng)作完成,第二個(gè)計(jì)算難度的動(dòng)作選擇在最后一個(gè)動(dòng)作完成外,我國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)員與其他國(guó)家運(yùn)動(dòng)員均選擇在第九、第十個(gè)動(dòng)作完成,由此可見,預(yù)賽第一套動(dòng)作編排的趨勢(shì)是將難度大的動(dòng)作放在成套動(dòng)作的兩端,將最大難度動(dòng)作放在成套的最后一個(gè)動(dòng)作的較多一些。2.決賽自選成套動(dòng)作難度與編排:成套難度值范圍在16.7-18.4分之間,我國(guó)高磊的18.4難度分高于其他國(guó)家,日本Ginga MUNETOMO和我國(guó)董棟的難度分位于第二、第三,其余選手的難度分則相差不大。決賽自選成套編排結(jié)果表明,自選成套的曲線圖總體呈U形分布,U形前端難度值較大,在這10個(gè)動(dòng)作編排當(dāng)中,我國(guó)董棟1、2、3、4、10這5個(gè)位置的動(dòng)作難度值較高,我國(guó)高磊1、2、3、4、5、10這6個(gè)位置的動(dòng)作難度值較高,而外國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)員則在1、2、3、10這4個(gè)位置的動(dòng)作難度均值較高。我國(guó)高磊的動(dòng)作難度較大,但在成套編排的動(dòng)作完成和連接方面有些瑕疵。3.空翻難度與編排:預(yù)賽規(guī)定動(dòng)作中,單個(gè)動(dòng)作空翻難度值分布在1-1.6分,成套空翻難度值分布在2-2.6分,我國(guó)兩名運(yùn)動(dòng)員和白俄羅斯Uladzislau HANCHAROU、俄羅斯選手Andrey YUDIN的空翻難度值均為2.6分,高于其他國(guó)家的運(yùn)動(dòng)員;決賽自選動(dòng)作中,單個(gè)動(dòng)作空翻難度值分布在1-1.6分,成套空翻難度值分布在11.8-13.6分,我國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)員高磊的空翻難度值最高,董棟和日本Ginga MUNETOMO的空翻難度值位于第二,其余國(guó)家的運(yùn)動(dòng)員空翻難度值要低一些�？辗幣沤Y(jié)果表明:中外優(yōu)秀男子蹦床運(yùn)動(dòng)員都是選擇前空翻、后空翻(5:5)交替進(jìn)行的編排方式;在空翻周數(shù)方面中外優(yōu)秀男子運(yùn)動(dòng)員大部分都是選擇三周動(dòng)作在前,而兩周動(dòng)作在后的順序,少數(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)員在三周動(dòng)作之間穿插了兩周動(dòng)作來作為緩沖,我國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)員的空翻周數(shù)比其他國(guó)家運(yùn)動(dòng)員多。4.轉(zhuǎn)體難度與編排:預(yù)賽規(guī)定動(dòng)作中,單個(gè)動(dòng)作轉(zhuǎn)體難度值分布在0.1-0.8分,成套轉(zhuǎn)體難度值分布在0.3-1.1分,日本、俄羅斯和新西蘭的運(yùn)動(dòng)員轉(zhuǎn)體難度值最高,我國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)員的轉(zhuǎn)體難度值低一些;決賽自選動(dòng)作中,單個(gè)動(dòng)作轉(zhuǎn)體難度值分布在0.1-0.6分,成套轉(zhuǎn)體難度值分布在2.5-3.1分,我國(guó)高磊、白俄羅斯運(yùn)動(dòng)員和日本的兩名運(yùn)動(dòng)員的轉(zhuǎn)體難度值最高,我國(guó)董棟的轉(zhuǎn)體難度值則低一些。轉(zhuǎn)體編排結(jié)果表明:中外優(yōu)秀男子運(yùn)動(dòng)員大部分都是選擇540度、360度和180度在前,而720度、900度和1080度在后的順序,少數(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)員會(huì)在成套最后三個(gè)選擇180度或360度的轉(zhuǎn)體動(dòng)作。轉(zhuǎn)體度數(shù)編排各國(guó)差異不大,選擇都比較相近。5.身體姿勢(shì)難度與編排:預(yù)賽規(guī)定動(dòng)作中,單個(gè)動(dòng)作身體姿勢(shì)難度分布在0.2-0.3分,成套身體姿勢(shì)難度值分布在0.2-0.5分,我國(guó)高磊和白俄羅斯運(yùn)動(dòng)員的身體姿勢(shì)難度值最高,其次是日本和新西蘭的運(yùn)動(dòng)員,而俄羅斯運(yùn)動(dòng)員和我國(guó)董棟的身體姿勢(shì)難度值則低一些;決賽自選動(dòng)作中,單個(gè)動(dòng)作身體姿勢(shì)難度值分布在0-0.3分,成套身體姿勢(shì)難度值分布在1.7-2.3分,日本運(yùn)動(dòng)員Masaki ITO的身體姿勢(shì)難度值最高,采用屈體和直體的比例也高于其他國(guó)家,而我國(guó)、白俄羅斯、俄羅斯和新西蘭的運(yùn)動(dòng)員身體姿勢(shì)難度值均低一些。身體姿勢(shì)編排結(jié)果表明:中外優(yōu)秀男子運(yùn)動(dòng)員大部分都是選擇屈體姿勢(shì)在前,團(tuán)身或屈體姿勢(shì)在中,而直體姿勢(shì)在后的順序,少數(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)員會(huì)在成套選擇團(tuán)身姿勢(shì)的動(dòng)作。身體姿勢(shì)編排各國(guó)無較大差異。
[Abstract]:The competitive level of Chinese trampoline men's individual project is in the leading position in the world. However, the competitive level of the foreign players is also rising. China wants to keep and expand our advantages in the trampoline project. It is necessary to know oneself and keep innovating. This paper uses literature, interview, video observation, and mathematical statistics. In order to improve the competitive level of Chinese men's Trampoline Athletes in the thirty-first Olympic trampoline competition, this paper makes a comparative study on the difficulty selection and arrangement of the complete movements of Chinese and foreign excellent men and women in the competition between China and foreign countries in the trampoline competition of the thirty-first Olympic Games. The results show that the 1. pre match stipulates the difficulty and arrangement of complete sets of movements. In the set, only two action difficulty is calculated, the other eight movements are based on a single week, the range of difficulty is between 3.1-3.5 points, Gao Lei and Dong Dong in China are 3.4 and 3.3 respectively, and the difficulty is lower than the 3.5 points of Russian Andrey YUDIN and Japanese Masaki ITO, but China's Gao Lei is in the first place with high completion points and high points. The result of the pre match set arrangement shows that, in addition to the two Russian athletes who have completed the first two movements in the first action arrangement of the first calculation difficulty in the preliminaries, the choice of the second difficult movements in the final action is completed in the final, and the athletes of our country and the other national athletes choose ninth, tenth. It can be seen from this, the trend of the first set of action arrangement is to put the difficult action on both ends of the complete set of movements, the difficulty and arrangement of the most difficult movements in the final action of the complete set of.2. final sets: the range of difficulty of the complete set is between the 16.7-18.4 points, and the 18.4 difficulty of Gao Lei in China. Higher than other countries, the difficulty of Japanese Ginga MUNETOMO and Dong Dong in China is second, third, and the other players have little difference. The result of the final selection complete set shows that the curve map of the self-selected complete set is distributed in the form of U shape, and the difficulty value of the U shape front end is larger. In these 10 movements, the 5 positions of Dong Dong 1,2,3,4,10 in China The difficulty value of action is high. The difficulty value of the 6 positions of Gao Lei 1,2,3,4,5,10 in our country is higher, while the foreign athletes are more difficult in the 4 positions of the 4 positions. In our country, the action difficulty is great, but the difficulty and arrangement of the.3. somersault in the complete set of action completion and connection: the predetermined action of the preliminary match. The difficulty value of single action air somersault is distributed at 1-1.6 points, and the difficulty value of complete somersault is distributed in 2-2.6. The difficulty values of the somersault of two Chinese athletes and Belarus Uladzislau HANCHAROU and the Russian Andrey YUDIN are all 2.6 points higher than those of other countries, and the difficulty value of single action air somersault in 1-1.6 is distributed in 1-1.6 The difficulty value of the whole set of somersault is distributed in 11.8-13.6. The difficulty value of Gao Lei's somersault in our country is the highest, the difficulty value of the somersault of Dong Dong and Ginga MUNETOMO in Japan is second, and the difficulty value of the somersault in the rest of the countries is lower. The result of the air somersault arrangement shows that both Chinese and foreign excellent male trampoline athletes are all the forward somersault and back somersault (5:5). In the week number of empty somersault, most of Chinese and foreign excellent men and Chinese athletes choose three weeks of action in front, and two weeks of action in the post, a few athletes interspersed two weeks of action between three weeks as a buffer, the number of somersault athletes in China is more difficult and compiling than other athletes in other countries. Row: the difficulty value of the single movement is distributed in 0.1-0.8, the difficulty value of the complete turn body is distributed in 0.3-1.1, the difficulty value of the athletes in Japan, Russia and New Zealand is the highest, the difficulty value of the athletes in our country is low; in the final self selection action, the difficulty value of the single movement is distributed in the 0.1-0.6 points, and the complete complete turn The difficulty value of the body is distributed at 2.5-3.1 points. The difficulty value of the two athletes in Gao Lei, China and Japan is the highest, and the difficulty value of Dong Dong's transition is lower in our country. The result of the rotation arrangement shows that most of the excellent men and women in China and foreign countries are before the choice of 540 degrees, 360 degrees and 180 degrees, while the 720, 900 and 1080 degrees are in the rear. In order, a small number of athletes will be in the final three choice of the final three or 360 degrees of 180 or 360 degrees of rotation movement. The change degree arrangement of countries is not very different, the choice is more similar to the similar body posture difficulty and arrangement: in the predetermined movement, the individual body posture difficulty distribution in the 0.2-0.3 points, complete body posture difficulty value distribution in 0.2-0.5, our country The physical posture difficulty of Gao Lei and Belarus athletes is the highest, followed by the Japanese and New Zealand athletes, while the Russian athletes and our country Dong Dong's body posture difficulty value is lower; in the final self selection action, the individual body posture difficulty value is distributed in the 0-0.3 points, the complete body posture difficulty value is distributed in the 1.7-2.3 points, the day is distributed. The physical posture of the athlete Masaki ITO is the most difficult, and the proportion of the body and body is higher than that of other countries, while the athletes of our country, Belarus, Russia and New Zealand are lower in the difficulty of body posture. Or the body position is in the middle, while the straight posture is in the order of the rear. A few athletes will be in the group selection posture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G838

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 常寶芳;韓華;;中、外優(yōu)秀女子蹦床運(yùn)動(dòng)員動(dòng)作難度與編排特征的比較研究[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報(bào);2016年02期

2 李健;;高度分規(guī)則實(shí)施前、后世界蹦床網(wǎng)上個(gè)人項(xiàng)目比賽成績(jī)變化特征研究[J];中國(guó)體育科技;2015年03期

3 何茂貴;韓華;徐剛;;1997～2016年國(guó)際蹦床規(guī)則變化規(guī)律性導(dǎo)向特征研究[J];遼寧體育科技;2015年01期

4 常寶芳;韓華;;當(dāng)今世界男子蹦床網(wǎng)上個(gè)人成套動(dòng)作的編排特征與趨向——第29屆世界蹦床錦標(biāo)賽分析[J];濟(jì)寧學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

5 劉愛梅;朱禮金;;新規(guī)則周期世界優(yōu)秀女子蹦床運(yùn)動(dòng)員技戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征及我國(guó)蹦床訓(xùn)練策略研究[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

6 常寶芳;韓華;;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)蹦床比賽女單成套動(dòng)作編排特征研究[J];濟(jì)寧學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

7 廖元金;趙秋爽;;蹦床評(píng)分規(guī)則的演變對(duì)運(yùn)動(dòng)員競(jìng)技能力的影響分析[J];福建體育科技;2013年06期

8 張輝;;從競(jìng)技蹦床比賽規(guī)則的演變探究其技術(shù)動(dòng)作的發(fā)展動(dòng)向[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

9 朱禮金;;訓(xùn)練學(xué)視角下蹦床比賽制勝規(guī)律的哲學(xué)思考與層次解析[J];中國(guó)體育科技;2013年05期

10 韓華;郜龍;劉勇;;倫敦奧運(yùn)周期世界男子自由體操競(jìng)爭(zhēng)特征研究[J];濟(jì)寧學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王_撳，

本文編號(hào)：2013902